Literature DB >> 24852497

Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Alicia Leiva1, Fabrice B R Parmentier, Pilar Andrés.   

Abstract

Aging is typically considered to bring a reduction of the ability to resist distraction by task-irrelevant stimuli. Yet recent work suggests that this conclusion must be qualified and that the effect of aging is mitigated by whether irrelevant and target stimuli emanate from the same modalities or from distinct ones. Some studies suggest that aging is especially sensitive to distraction within-modality while others suggest it is greater across modalities. Here we report the first study to measure the effect of aging on deviance distraction in cross-modal (auditory-visual) and uni-modal (auditory-auditory) oddball tasks. Young and older adults were asked to judge the parity of target digits (auditory or visual in distinct blocks of trials), each preceded by a task-irrelevant sound (the same tone on most trials-the standard sound-or, on rare and unpredictable trials, a burst of white noise-the deviant sound). Deviant sounds yielded distraction (longer response times relative to standard sounds) in both tasks and age groups. However, an age-related increase in distraction was observed in the cross-modal task and not in the uni-modal task. We argue that aging might affect processes involved in the switching of attention across modalities and speculate that this may due to the slowing of this type of attentional shift or a reduction in cognitive control required to re-orient attention toward the target's modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24852497     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0573-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  89 in total

1.  Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection.

Authors:  Stefan Berti
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter's informational value.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Jane V Elsley; Jessica K Ljungberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-03-24

3.  The effects of meaningful irrelevant speech and road traffic noise on teachers' attention, episodic and semantic memory.

Authors:  Ingela Enmarker
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2004-11

4.  Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity--a mismatch negativity study comparing musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Titia L van Zuijen; Elyse Sussman; István Winkler; Risto Näätänen; Mari Tervaniemi
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-23

5.  Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

6.  Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sounds.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Maria Hebrero
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.

Authors:  Biqin Li; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2013

8.  Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing.

Authors:  D M Jones; W J Macken
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-03

9.  Selective attention to emotion in the aging brain.

Authors:  Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Elaine R Robertson; Joseph A Mikels; Laura L Carstensen; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-09

10.  Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-11-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Antonia P Pacheco-Unguetti; Sara Valero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Fabrice Br Parmentier; Bernhard Angele; Julie A Kirkby
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults?

Authors:  Yatin Mahajan; Jeesun Kim; Chris Davis
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  A Scoping Review of Audiovisual Integration Methodology: Screening for Auditory and Visual Impairment in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Aysha Basharat; Archana Thayanithy; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Multisensory Integration Strategy for Modality-Specific Loss of Inhibition Control in Older Adults.

Authors:  Ahreum Lee; Hokyoung Ryu; Jae-Kwan Kim; Eunju Jeong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.