Literature DB >> 11958357

The sandwich effect reassessed: effects of streaming, distraction, and modality.

Alastair P Nicholls1, Dylan M Jones.   

Abstract

The degree of disruption from interleaving auditory irrelevant items within a sequence of to-be-remembered items--the sandwich effect--was examined in two experiments. Previous demonstrations of the effect have shown that the penalty for interleaving items is small and that changing irrelevant tokens is no more damaging than repeating ones (contrary to the classic changing state effect of irrelevant sound). The results of Experiment 1 suggest that these earlier results were due to the lack of tokens in the irrelevant sequence (in part, the result of using a span method). The results of Experiment 2 also show that the sandwich effect was marked and, further, that it comprised two elements, one due to the partitioning of relevant from irrelevant streams (which may be promoted by similarity of identity within sequence or pitch disparity between sequences), and the other a classic irrelevant sound effect (with effects of changing state). The results are discussed in terms of the role of perceptual organization within and between modalities in short-term memory.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11958357     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

Review 1.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Authors:  I Neath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  Capturing the suffix: cognitive streaming in immediate serial recall.

Authors:  Alastair P Nicholls; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.

Authors:  D Jones; C Madden; C Miles
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-05

4.  An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech.

Authors:  D C Lecompte
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

5.  The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects.

Authors:  G J Hitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

6.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall.

Authors:  M P Page; D Norris
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: a new approach to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  D C LeCompte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing.

Authors:  D M Jones; W J Macken
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-03

9.  Functional characteristics of the inner voice and the inner ear: single or double agency?

Authors:  W J Macken; D M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall.

Authors:  D C LeCompte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Listening to every other word: examining the strength of linkage variables in forming streams of speech.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Sarah Hanl; Linda Paul; Wolfgang Ellermeier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-14

3.  Dissociating the Disruptive Effects of Irrelevant Music and Speech on Serial Recall of Tonal and Verbal Sequences.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Hanna Meinhardt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.