Literature DB >> 1488646

Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory.

D Jones1, N Morris.   

Abstract

Irrelevant speech markedly impairs serial recall of visually presented lists, even though the person is asked to ignore the speech. In this, the first major review of the phenomenon, we conclude that (i) the effect occurs in memory rather than at encoding; (ii) within memory, the disruption occurs as a result of a confluence of information at the phonological rather than at the articulatory stage of coding; (iii) speech does not have privileged access to memory, since its disruptive effects may be attenuated by habituation; and (iv) disruption occurs as a result of the changing state of the auditory channel, not as had previously been thought the phonological similarity of visual and auditory streams, and is particularly sensitive to pitch changes in both speech and non-speech stimuli. These conclusions are discussed in the light of two complementary theoretical constructs: a cascading filter system responsible for the access of speech to memory and a system of coding within memory sensitive to changing state of the stream responsible for disruption of serial order. Recommendations are made also for empirical work to refine these constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1488646     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1992.tb00911.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Psychol        ISSN: 0036-5564


  8 in total

1.  Revisiting backward recall and benchmark memory effects: a reply to Bireta et al. (2010).

Authors:  Katherine Guérard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Samantha C Burns; Cindy Chamberland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

2.  The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects.

Authors:  M Martín-Loeches; S R Schweinberger; W Sommer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

3.  Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing.

Authors:  D M Jones; W J Macken
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-03

4.  Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: the role of segmentation.

Authors:  D M Jones; W J Macken; A C Murray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

5.  Evaluating models of working memory through the effects of concurrent irrelevant information.

Authors:  Jason M Chein; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-02

6.  Acoustic Detail But Not Predictability of Task-Irrelevant Speech Disrupts Working Memory.

Authors:  Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The role of consciousness in the phonological loop: hidden in plain sight.

Authors:  Bradley R Buchsbaum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-08

8.  Effect of Auditory Distraction on Working Memory, Attention Switching, and Listening Comprehension.

Authors:  Naveen K Nagaraj
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-05-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.