Literature DB >> 7600177

Left ventricular quantification with breath-hold MR imaging: comparison with echocardiography.

J G Bogaert1, H T Bosmans, F E Rademakers, E P Bellon, M C Herregods, J A Verschakelen, F Van de Werf, G J Marchal.   

Abstract

To evaluate the reproducibility of measurements of left ventricular (LV) dimensions, function, and myocardial mass, segmented k-space gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed on two occasions on 12 healthy volunteers. To compare the MR data, all volunteers underwent a two-dimensional echocardiography with determination of LV dimensions and function. The left ventricle was imaged during breath-hold by consecutive, contiguous short-axis views at end-diastole and end-systole. An average of eight short-axis views was needed to encompass the whole left ventricle. This fast MR sequence limited the total acquisition time to 12 min. LV volumes and masses were calculated after manual delineation of epicardial and endocardial surfaces by two observers in a blinded fashion. Interstudy variability varied between 4.1% and 10.3% for LV end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume, respectively. Differences in interobserver variability were smaller and varied between 3.6% and 7.3% for LV ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume, respectively. Intraobserver variabilities ranged between 2.0% and 7.0% for LV ejection fraction and end-systolic volume, respectively. These variability percentages agree very well with other studies in literature using other MR sequences. No significant differences in LV dimensions or function were found between MR imaging and echocardiography. In conclusion, this MR sequence allows fast and reproducible LV quantification.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7600177     DOI: 10.1007/BF02426395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  19 in total

1.  Which standard has the gold?

Authors:  C B Higgins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Cardiac ejection fraction: phantom study comparing cine MR imaging, radionuclide blood pool imaging, and ventriculography.

Authors:  J F Debatin; S N Nadel; J F Paolini; H D Sostman; R E Coleman; A J Evans; C Beam; C E Spritzer; T M Bashore
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second.

Authors:  M K Stehling; R Turner; P Mansfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence.

Authors:  D J Atkinson; R R Edelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L R Dilworth; A M Aisen; G B Mancini; I Lande; A J Buda
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Evaluation of left ventricular volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J Møgelvang; C Thomsen; J Mehlsen; G Bräckle; M Stubgaard; O Henriksen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Determination of left ventricular volume and mass with use of biphasic spin-echo MR imaging: comparison with cine MR.

Authors:  G R Caputo; J Suzuki; C Kondo; H Cho; R A Quaife; C B Higgins; D L Parker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Application of cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for sequential evaluation of response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  N E Doherty; K C Seelos; J Suzuki; G R Caputo; M O'Sullivan; S M Sobol; P Cavero; K Chatterjee; W W Parmley; C B Higgins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Measurement of ventricular volumes in the dog by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  W Markiewicz; U Sechtem; R Kirby; N Derugin; G C Caputo; C B Higgins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for determination of left ventricular ejection fraction and comparison with angiography.

Authors:  A C Van Rossum; F C Visser; M Sprenger; M J Van Eenige; J Valk; J P Roos
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The role of non-invasive imaging in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  C Roobottom; G Mitchell; S Iyengar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Accuracy of short-axis cardiac MRI automatically derived from scout acquisitions in free-breathing and breath-holding modes.

Authors:  M G Danilouchkine; J J M Westenberg; B P F Lelieveldt; J H C Reiber
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  A simple method to estimate cardiac function during routine multi-row detector CT exams.

Authors:  Piet K Vanhoenacker; Lieven R Van Hoe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes and function by cine-MR imaging depending on the investigator's experience.

Authors:  A Bailly; J Lipiecki; P Chabrot; A Alfidja; J M Garcier; S Ughetto; J Ponsonnaille; L Boyer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Gated blood-pool SPECT versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

Authors:  François Harel; Vincent Finnerty; Jean Grégoire; Bernard Thibault; François Marcotte; Patricia Ugolini; Paul Khairy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Left ventricular myocardial mass determination by contrast enhanced colour Doppler compared with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G P Bezante; X Chen; G Molinari; A Valbusa; L Deferrari; V Sebastiani; N Yokoyama; S Steinmetz; A Barsotti; K Q Schwarz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Comparison of LV mass and volume measurements derived from electron beam tomography using cine imaging and angiographic imaging.

Authors:  Songshou Mao; Junichiro Takasu; Janis Child; Sivi Carson; Ronald Oudiz; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with cadmium-zinc-telluride detectors allows real-time assessment of dobutamine-stress-induced wall motion abnormalities.

Authors:  Rene Nkoulou; Mathias Wolfrum; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Michael Fiechter; Ronny R Buechel; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in stable ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  S W Kirschbaum; P J de Feyter; R-J M van Geuns
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Relation between regional and global systolic function in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy after beta-blocker therapy or revascularization.

Authors:  T A M Kaandorp; J J Bax; S E Bleeker; J Doornbos; E P Viergever; D Poldermans; E E van der Wall; A de Roos; H J Lamb
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.