Literature DB >> 3414556

Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for determination of left ventricular ejection fraction and comparison with angiography.

A C Van Rossum1, F C Visser, M Sprenger, M J Van Eenige, J Valk, J P Roos.   

Abstract

Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared with standard monoplane left ventriculography in 46 patients with various cardiac diseases. Two different MRI strategies were used. In 28 patients (group 1), ejection fraction was determined using a single slice comparable with the right anterior oblique projection of the ventriculogram. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction yielded a poor correlation between single slice MRI (y) and ventriculography (x) (y = 28.7 + 0.47 x, r = 0.65). In 18 patients (group 2), a multiple contiguous slice MRI technique was used to allow ejection fraction and stroke volume determination by summing up the volumes of ventricular cavity intersections. Regression analysis showed a high correlation between multiple slice MRI (y) and ventriculography (x) (y = 7.2 + 0.88 x, r = 0.98). Also, correlation between MRI right (y) and left (x) ventricular stroke volumes was satisfactory, (y = -12.8 + 1.09 x, r = 0.83). It is concluded that the multiple slice imaging technique in MRI provides an accurate noninvasive means for quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction that can be extended to the determination of left ventricular volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3414556     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90668-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  16 in total

1.  MRI-derived left ventricular function parameters and mass in healthy young adults: relation with gender and body size.

Authors:  J T Marcus; L K DeWaal; M J Götte; R J van der Geest; R M Heethaar; A C Van Rossum
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-10

Review 2.  Novel techniques for assessment of left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  Sonal Chandra; Hicham Skali; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Evaluation of right ventricular volume and mass using retrospective ECG-gated cardiac multidetector computed tomography: comparison with first-pass radionuclide angiography.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Kim; Young Hoon Ryu; Jin Hur; Sang Jin Kim; Hyun Soo Kim; Byoung Wook Choi; Young Kim; Hyung Jung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Ejection fraction derived by noninvasive modalities versus left ventricular angiographic determination.

Authors:  Tahir Tak
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-05

5.  Non-invasive cardiac evaluation in heart failure patients using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shors; William G Cotts; Biljana Pavlovic-Surjancev; Mihai Gheorghiade; James C Carr; Richard M McCarthy; Scott F Pereles; Paul J Finn
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Left ventricular systolic function during treadmill walking with load carriage in adolescents.

Authors:  Moran Sagiv; Michael Sagiv; Ruthie Amir; David Ben-Sira
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Gated SPECT: what's the ideal method to measure LVEF?

Authors:  Sum-Che Man; Ernst E van der Wall; Cees A Swenne
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Edge Sharpness Assessment by Parametric Modeling: Application to Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  R Ahmad; Y Ding; O P Simonetti
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 0.481

Review 9.  Tools for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ramkumar Krishnamurthy; Benjamin Cheong; Raja Muthupillai
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04

10.  True real-time cardiac MRI in free breathing without ECG synchronization using a novel sequence with radial k-space sampling and balanced SSFP contrast mode.

Authors:  Ralf W Bauer; Isabel Radtke; Kai T Block; Maya C Larson; J Matthias Kerl; Renate Hammerstingl; Thomas G Graf; Thomas J Vogl; Shuo Zhang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.