Literature DB >> 1564230

Application of cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for sequential evaluation of response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy.

N E Doherty1, K C Seelos, J Suzuki, G R Caputo, M O'Sullivan, S M Sobol, P Cavero, K Chatterjee, W W Parmley, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

Cine nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging was used to serially measure cardiovascular function in 17 patients with New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 45% who were treated for 3 months with benazepril hydrochloride, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, while continuing treatment with diuretic agents and digoxin. Interobserver reproducibilities for ejection fraction (r = 0.94, SEE 3.3%), end-systolic volume (r = 0.98, SEE 10.6 ml), end-diastolic volume (r = 0.99, SEE 8.29 ml), end-systolic mass (r = 0.96, SEE 15.4 g), end-systolic wall stress (r = 0.91, SEE 10 dynes.s.cm-5) and end-systolic stress/volume ratio (r = 0.85, SEE 0.13) demonstrated applicability of cine NMR imaging for the serial assessment of cardiovascular function in response to pharmacologic interventions in patients with heart failure. During 12 weeks of treatment with benazepril, ejection fraction increased progressively from 29.7 +/- 2.2% (mean +/- SEM) to 36 +/- 2.2% (p less than 0.05), end-diastolic volume decreased from 166 +/- 14 to 158 +/- 12 ml (p = NS), end-systolic volume decreased from 118 +/- 12 to 106 +/- 11 ml (p less than 0.05), left ventricular mass decreased from 235 +/- 13 to 220 +/- 12 g (p less than 0.05), end-systolic wall stress decreased 29% from 90 +/- 5 to 64 +/- 5 dynes.s.cm-5 (p less than 0.05), end-systolic pressure decreased from 92.6 +/- 3.7 to 78.8 +/- 5.3 (p less than 0.05) and end-systolic stress/volume ratio, a load-independent index of contractility, decreased from 0.83 +/- 0.05 to 0.67 +/- 0.06 (p less than 0.05), demonstrating that improved ejection fraction is due to afterload reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1564230     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90337-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  20 in total

1.  MRI of myocardial and pericardial disease.

Authors:  G P Reddy
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Non-invasive cardiac evaluation in heart failure patients using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shors; William G Cotts; Biljana Pavlovic-Surjancev; Mihai Gheorghiade; James C Carr; Richard M McCarthy; Scott F Pereles; Paul J Finn
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constantin B Marcu; Aernout M Beek; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Is magnetic resonance imaging the 'reference standard' for cardiac functional assessment? Factors influencing measurement of left ventricular mass and volumes.

Authors:  H Steen; K Nasir; E Flynn; I El-Shehaby; S Lai; H A Katus; D Bluemcke; J A C Lima
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Effects of propranolol treatment on left ventricular function and intracellular calcium regulation in rats with postinfarction heart failure.

Authors:  S E Litwin; S E Katz; J P Morgan; P S Douglas
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system in established cardiac failure.

Authors:  K Chatterjee
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Reproducibility of left ventricular size, shape and mass with echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide angiography in patients with anterior wall infarction. A plea for core laboratories.

Authors:  L H Baur; J J Schipperheyn; E A van der Velde; E E van der Wall; J H Reiber; R J van der Geest; P R van Dijkman; J G Gerritsen; B L van Eck-Smit; P J Voogd; A V Bruschke
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-12

Review 8.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of cardiovascular disorders. Part 1: current applications.

Authors:  Ajit H Goenka; Scott D Flamm
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-02

9.  Right ventricular failure predicted from right bundle branch block: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging validation.

Authors:  Santhosh R Devarapally; Sameer Arora; Ali Ahmad; Mike Sood; Amaar El Sergany; Terrence Sacchi; Barry Saul; Rahul Gaglani; John Heitner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-10

Review 10.  The crosstalk between autonomic nervous system and blood vessels.

Authors:  Yulan Sheng; Li Zhu
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.