Literature DB >> 7007414

Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.

K E Aldridge, R L Hodges.   

Abstract

The Entero-Set kit (Fisher Diagnostics) is a 20-biochemical-test system used in the identification of members of the Enterobacteriaceae. This kit was compared with the API 20E (Analytab Products) and conventional media systems, using 505 (303 stock and 202 clinical) strains of Enterobacteriaceae. When the Entero-Set and API 20E results were compared with those of the conventional media system, the Entero-Set performed as well as the API 20E in overall identification. Comparison of common biochemical tests among the various systems showed that citrate, arabinose, adonitol, inositol, and malonate gave correlations below 90%. The majority of the discrepancies were found among stock cultures. In addition, most discrepancies occurred with species of Enterobacter, Salmonella, Proteus, Klebsiella, and Serratia. Reproducibility studies showed the Entero-Set system to perform with a high degree of accuracy and reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7007414      PMCID: PMC273734          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.120-125.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  T E Kiehn; K Brennan; P D Ellner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

3.  Evaluation of the redesigned enterotube--a system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K M Tomfohrde; D L Rhoden; P B Smith; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-02

4.  Evaluation of the improved Auxotab 1 System for identifying Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D L Rhoden; K M Tomfohrde; P B Smith; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-08

5.  Evaluation of the Auxotab Enteric 1 System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J A Washington; P K Yu; W J Martin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-02

6.  Evaluation of the BBL Minitek system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  S L Hansen; D R Hardesty; B M Myers
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-11

7.  Evaluation of five test-kits-API, AuxoTab, Enterotube, PathoTec and R-B-for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  C E Nord; A A Lindberg; A Dahlbäck
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1974-03-22       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Metachromatic agar-diffusion methods for detecting staphylococcal nuclease activity.

Authors:  R V Lachica; C Genigeorgis; P D Hoeprich
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-04

9.  Evaluation of the modified R-B system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P B Smith; K M Tomfohrde; D L Rhoden; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-11

10.  Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; B B Gardner; S J Clark; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of API 20E and invA PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica isolates from swine production units.

Authors:  Daniele M Nucera; Carol W Maddox; Patricia Hoien-Dalen; Ronald M Weigel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D Sahm; C O'Hara; C Ciaglia; M Yu; N Yamane; G Scharnweber; D Rhoden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M J Bale; K R Schulte; F P Koontz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  A Robinson; Y S McCarter; J Tetreault
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.

Authors:  P R Murray; A Gauthier; A Niles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of the Enteric-Tek system for identifying Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  A O Esaias; D L Rhoden; P B Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Phenotypic and Phylogenetic Identification of Coliform Bacteria Obtained Using 12 Coliform Methods Approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Authors:  Ya Zhang; Pei-Ying Hong; Mark W LeChevallier; Wen-Tso Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Diluent composition for use of API 20E in characterizing marine and estuarine bacteria.

Authors:  M T MacDonell; F L Singleton; M A Hood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.792

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.