Literature DB >> 353065

Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

K E Aldridge, B B Gardner, S J Clark, J M Matsen.   

Abstract

The Micro-ID, a new identification kit for Enterobacteriaceae, consists of 15 biochemical tests, with substrates and reagents impregnated in filter paper disks. A 0.2-ml amount of an organism suspension equal to a 0.5 McFarland standard is pipetted into each of the compartments. After 4 h of incubation and addition of potassium-hydroxide (KOH) to the Voges-Proskauer test, the color reactions are read according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. A five-digit octal code number is derived from each set of reactions from which an identification is derived by using a code book. In a single-blind, comparative study of the Micro-ID system with the API 20E system (Analytab Products Inc.) and conventional biochemical tube media, we found that the Micro-ID and the API 20E systems gave a 90% identification correlation when each was compared with the conventional tube media. A comparison of all three systems gave an 82% overall identification correlation. When the common tests of Micro-ID and API 20E were compared with conventional tube media, we found that the tests in the Micro-ID performed as well as or better than those of the API 20E. Certain groups of organisms, i.e., Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Proteus, Salmonella, and Serratia genera, were found to give low correlation on certain common tests. When using primary isolation MacConkey plates from the clinical laboratory, only 74% of the plates with Enterobacteriaceae had sufficient numbers of colonies of each enteric organism to produce the 0.5 McFarland inoculum density required. Problems concerning the misidentification of some organisms are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 353065      PMCID: PMC275051          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.7.6.507-513.1978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  6 in total

1.  Reproducibility of the analytab (API 20E) system.

Authors:  D A Butler; C M Lobregat; T L Gavan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  T E Kiehn; K Brennan; P D Ellner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

3.  Evaluation of five test-kits-API, AuxoTab, Enterotube, PathoTec and R-B-for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  C E Nord; A A Lindberg; A Dahlbäck
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1974-03-22       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparison of the R-B system and the Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  S P Coppel; I G Coppel
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Metachromatic agar-diffusion methods for detecting staphylococcal nuclease activity.

Authors:  R V Lachica; C Genigeorgis; P D Hoeprich
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-04

6.  Comparative study of the efficacy of seven paper-reagent strips and conventional biochemical tests in identifying gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  J M Matsen; J C Sherris
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-09
  6 in total
  32 in total

1.  Comparison of API 20E and invA PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica isolates from swine production units.

Authors:  Daniele M Nucera; Carol W Maddox; Patricia Hoien-Dalen; Ronald M Weigel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Salmonella, Shigella, and yersinia.

Authors:  John P Dekker; Karen M Frank
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 1.935

3.  Biographical feature: John Matsen, M.D.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparative evaluation of the new Titertek Enterobac Rapid Automated System (TTE-RAS) for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D Anzivino; E Nani; A Lavitola; G Amato; E Gulletta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of Micro-ID and API 20E systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D J Blazevic; D L Mackay; N M Warwood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the modified Micro-ID system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  W J Buesching; D L Rhoden; A O Esaias; P B Smith; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  W M Gooch; G A Hill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of Gram-stain screen and Micro-ID methods for direct identification of Enterobacteriaceae from urines.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; C C Olmstead
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.