Literature DB >> 7714193

Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

A Robinson1, Y S McCarter, J Tetreault.   

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of the Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system (Crystal; Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.), API 20E (API; bioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.), and the Vitek GNI card (Vitek; bioMérieux Vitek) was performed with 512 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli, including 381 members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and 131 nonenteric bacilli. With supplemental testing, API, Crystal, and Vitek correctly identified to the genus and species level 505 (98.6%), 489 (95.5%), and 494 (96.5%) of the 512 isolates, respectively. Supplemental testing, as specified by the manufacturer, was required to identify 119 (23.2%), 18 (3.5%), and 5 (1.0%) of the isolates with the three systems, respectively. Of the 381 isolates from the family Enterobacteriaceae, API and Crystal correctly identified 90.3 and 91.6% by 18 to 24 h without supplemental testing, respectively, and Vitek identified 92.4 and 96.1% following 10 and 18 h of incubation, respectively. Of the 131 nonenteric organisms, API and Crystal correctly identified 28.2 and 93.9% by 18 to 24 h without supplemental testing, respectively, and Vitek identified 84.0% by 10 h and 93.9% by 18 h. Errors in identification with each system were infrequent and appeared to be randomly distributed among the genera evaluated. The three systems were comparable in accuracy when either a weighted clinical laboratory profile of organisms or a group of selected isolates in a stress test sample was evaluated (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the three systems in their ability to identify either the isolates in the weighted group or those in the stress test (P > 0.05). Crystal compared favorably with API and Vitek, which have established track records in clinical laboratories, and is acceptable for the identification of members of the Enterobacteriaceae and nonenteric bacilli in a clinical microbiology laboratory.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714193      PMCID: PMC227949          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.364-370.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D Sahm; C O'Hara; C Ciaglia; M Yu; N Yamane; G Scharnweber; D Rhoden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of a commercial identification kit and conventional biochemical tests used for the identification of enteric gram-negative rods.

Authors:  L R McCarthy; J B Mayo; G Bell; D Armstrong
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M J Bale; K R Schulte; F P Koontz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  autoSCAN-4 system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  D L Rhoden; P B Smith; C N Baker; B Schable
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  B Holmes; M Costas; T Thaker; M Stevens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Use of the Autobac IDX system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  W J Costigan; G E Hollick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; J E Johnson; G A Alexander; R Paxson; G L Alderson
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; R L Hodges
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of accuracy of multitest micromethod system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J A Washington; P K Yu; W J Martin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-09

10.  Evaluation of PASCO MIC-ID system for identifying gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  D L Rhoden; B Schable; P B Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of autoSCAN-W/A and the Vitek GNI+ AutoMicrobic system for identification of non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  L L Sung; D I Yang; C C Hung; H T Ho
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Particular biochemical profiles for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates on the ID 32E system.

Authors:  A Leclercq; B Lambert; D Pierard; J Mahillon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Classification, identification, and clinical significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella.

Authors:  C M O'Hara; F W Brenner; J M Miller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Accuracy of six commercially available systems for identification of members of the family vibrionaceae.

Authors:  Caroline M O'Hara; Evangeline G Sowers; Cheryl A Bopp; Sarah B Duda; Nancy A Strockbine
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of API 20E and invA PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica isolates from swine production units.

Authors:  Daniele M Nucera; Carol W Maddox; Patricia Hoien-Dalen; Ronald M Weigel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of medically relevant gram-negative rods.

Authors:  G Funke; D Monnet; C deBernardis; A von Graevenitz; J Freney
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of Vitek GNI and GNI+ cards for identification of gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  P P Bourbeau; B J Heiter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of Vitek GNI+ and Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems Crystal E/NF identification systems for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative, glucose-fermenting and non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.

Authors:  C M O'Hara; G L Westbrook; J M Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Salmonella, Shigella, and yersinia.

Authors:  John P Dekker; Karen M Frank
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 1.935

10.  Faecal coliform bacteria in Febros river (northwest Portugal): temporal variation, correlation with water parameters, and species identification.

Authors:  João Paulo Cabral; Cristina Marques
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.