Literature DB >> 7042744

Evaluation of the Enteric-Tek system for identifying Enterobacteriaceae.

A O Esaias, D L Rhoden, P B Smith.   

Abstract

The Enteric-Tek wheel (Flow Laboratories), consisting of 14 different biochemical parameters for rapidly identifying Enterobacteriaceae, was evaluated and compared with the conventional method for completely identifying 301 enteric cultures, representing 36 species. The Enteric-Tek system correctly identified 264 (97.8%) of the 270 common or typical strains and 26 (83.9%) of the 31 unusual or atypical strains tested, demonstrating an overall identification accuracy rate of 96.3%. There were 80 (26.6%) correctly identified strains requiring additional tests. Of the 11 (3.6%) misidentifications, 5 (3 Klebsiella and 2 Salmonella strains) were correctly identified at the genus level. When 4,228 individual tests in the Enteric-Tek wheel were compared with the conventional tubed media, 96.4% of the tests agreed; urease, citrate, adonitol, and lactose agreed less than 97%. The Enteric-Tek system was found to be reliable and accurate in producing identifications at the genus and species level within 18 to 24 h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7042744      PMCID: PMC272110          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.419-424.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of Micro-ID and API 20E systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D J Blazevic; D L Mackay; N M Warwood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the modified Micro-ID system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  W J Buesching; D L Rhoden; A O Esaias; P B Smith; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; R L Hodges
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M T Kelly; J M Latimer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; B B Gardner; S J Clark; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  W J Buesching; J R Svirbely; L W Ayers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.