Literature DB >> 6386866

Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.

P R Murray, A Gauthier, A Niles.   

Abstract

A total of 492 clinical isolates from the family Enterobacteriaceae were tested in the API 20E, Rapid E, and Quantum II identification systems. Discrepant identifications among these three systems were resolved by repeat testing in the identification systems or use of conventional biochemical tests. Of these isolates, 94.1% were correctly identified with the API 20E and Rapid E systems, and 97.0% were correctly identified with the Quantum II system. An additional 48 non-Enterobacteriaceae isolates were tested with the Quantum II system, and 83.3% were correctly identified. The majority of incorrect identifications with the Rapid E and Quantum II systems were caused by a single aberrant biochemical reaction. Reproducibility of the biochemical reactions obtained with these two systems was evaluated by testing 40 organisms in triplicate. Identical biocodes for all three tests were obtained for 10 organisms with the Quantum II system and for 19 organisms with the Rapid E system. Reproducibility of the Quantum II test results was improved with a subsequent modification of the photometer of this system. Both the Rapid E and Quantum II systems were inexpensive and were technically easy to inoculate and interpret.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6386866      PMCID: PMC271361          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.509-514.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Standardization of the Analytab Enteric (API 20E) system to increase accuracy and reproducibility of the test for biotype characterization of bacteria.

Authors:  P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Identification of Enterobacteriaceae in frozen microdilution trays prepared by Micro-Media Systems.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal; L J Effinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the Sensititre system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J L Staneck; J Vincelette; F Lamothe; E A Polk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Time-motion and cost comparison study of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional biochemical testing in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M J Bale; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; T L Gavan; P B Smith; A Sonnenwirth; W Taylor; W J Martin; D Rhoden; A Balows
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; R L Hodges
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the MS-2 system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  A W McCracken; W J Martin; L R McCarthy; D A Schwab; B H Cooper; N G Helgeson; S Prowant; J Robson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M T Kelly; J M Latimer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli.

Authors:  A L Barry; T L Gavan; R E Badal; M J Telenson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  15 in total

1.  Identification of motile Aeromonas strains with the MicroScan WalkAway system in conjunction with the combo negative type 1S panels.

Authors:  J Vivas; A I Sáa; A Tinajas; L Barbeyto; L A Rodríguez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.

Authors:  C E Stager; J R Davis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D Sahm; C O'Hara; C Ciaglia; M Yu; N Yamane; G Scharnweber; D Rhoden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Packaged identification systems and bacteria of veterinary origin.

Authors:  P J Blackwell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the Mini-ID Enterobacteriaceae screen system.

Authors:  C M O'Hara; P B Smith; B A Schable
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of Quantum II microbiology system for identification of gram-negative bacteria of veterinary origin.

Authors:  R L Jones; W S Adney; M A Davis; H Vonbyren; G Thompson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M J Bale; K R Schulte; F P Koontz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.

Authors:  J J Plorde; J A Gates; L G Carlson; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of the Micro-ID, the API 20E and the Rapid 20E for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; M R Jacobs; M K Buick; M M Flanagan; G A Gymer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; T Preston; M Bale; F P Koontz; B A Body
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.