Literature DB >> 6418754

Comparison of two automated instrument systems for rapid susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.

J E Johnson, J H Jorgensen, S A Crawford, J S Redding, R C Pruneda.   

Abstract

The Vitek AutoMicrobic System with GSC-plus cards and the Abbott MS-2 system were tested in parallel and the results were compared directly with those of a reference microdilution minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) procedure on a group of 262 clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae and of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Results of both systems were compared with the reference MIC for category agreement, and in addition, the Vitek MICs were compared with those obtained by the reference procedure. The Vitek system provided an essential category correlation of 89.4% for enteric bacteria and 97.0% for P. aeruginosa. Vitek MICs agreed within 1 twofold dilutional increment for 86.3% of the enteric bacteria tested and for 96.2% of the P. aeruginosa isolates. The Abbott MS-2 essential categoric agreement was 92.0% for enteric bacteria and 92.4% for P. aeruginosa. If only aminoglycosides or carbenicillin were considered for P. aeruginosa isolates, the essential category agreement was 92.5% for the Vitek and 93.3% for the MS-2. The majority of MS-2 category errors (13 of 19) with P. aeruginosa involved gentamicin results on isolates whose reference MICs were 8 micrograms/ml and whose MS-2 results were susceptible (MIC less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml). Retesting of the P. aeruginosa isolates in calcium-supplemented MS-2 broth increased the essential agreement for the aminoglycosides to 97.5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6418754      PMCID: PMC272897          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.18.6.1301-1309.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; T L Gavan; J C Sherris; A Balows; J M Matsen; L D Sabath; F Schoenknecht; L D Thrupp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Relationship of early readings of minimal inhibitory concentrations to the results of overnight tests.

Authors:  M F Lampe; C L Aitken; P G Dennis; P S Forsythe; K E Patrick; F D Schoenknecht; J C Sherris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST): a review of changing trends, quality control guidelines, test accuracy, and recommendation for the testing of beta-lactam drugs.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Abbott MS-2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; J P Anhalt; J A Washington; L R McCarthy; F D Schoenknecht; J C Sherris; H J Spencer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Concurrent comparability of automated systems and commercially prepared microdilution trays for susceptibility testing.

Authors:  S L Hansen; P K Freedy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M T Kelly; J M Latimer; L C Balfour
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Quantitative susceptibility test methods in major United States medical centers.

Authors:  P R Murray; J H Jorgensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Clinical evaluation of automated antibiotic susceptibility testing with the MS-2 system.

Authors:  W G Barnes; L R Green; R L Talley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Automated microbiological detection/identification system.

Authors:  C Aldridge; P W Jones; S Gibson; J Lanham; M Meyer; R Vannest; R Charles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the automated phoenix system for potential routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  J-L Donay; D Mathieu; P Fernandes; C Prégermain; P Bruel; A Wargnier; I Casin; F X Weill; P H Lagrange; J L Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Manual versus automated streaking system in clinical microbiology laboratory: Performance evaluation of Previ Isola for blood culture and body fluid samples.

Authors:  Qute Choi; Hyun Jin Kim; Jong Wan Kim; Gye Cheol Kwon; Sun Hoe Koo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Comparison of a highly automated 5-h susceptibility testing system, the Cobas-Bact, with two reference methods: Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and broth microdilution.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles; R L Heeren
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Accuracy and reproducibility of the AutoMicrobic System Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card for testing selected challenge organisms.

Authors:  H L Nadler; C Dolan; L Mele; S R Kurtz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of the Cobas-Bact five-hour susceptibility testing system with the NCCLS agar diffusion and dilution methods.

Authors:  J Wüst; W Heizmann; U Hardegger; B Manncke
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Rapid MIC testing with the sensititre autoreader.

Authors:  J L Staneck; S D Allen; E E Harris; R C Tilton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card.

Authors:  K G Van Horn; A M Vandernoot; E W Burke; J C McKitrick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; R T Lally; M N Ederer; C O Quall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of the Cobas Bact automated system for susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis to azlocillin, mezlocillin, and ciprofloxacin compared to NCCLS and DIN standards.

Authors:  W Heizmann; H Werner; F Heilmann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.553

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.