Literature DB >> 3930559

Accuracy and reproducibility of the AutoMicrobic System Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card for testing selected challenge organisms.

H L Nadler, C Dolan, L Mele, S R Kurtz.   

Abstract

A total of 180 selected strains of gram-negative bacilli were tested for susceptibility to nine antibiotics by the prototype General Susceptibility Card and reference broth microdilution MIC method, and 112 of 180 were tested by the modified Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.). When category calls--susceptible, intermediate, and resistant for the prototype card and very susceptible, moderately susceptible, and resistant for the modified card--were identical or compatible (very susceptible by one method and moderately susceptible by the other), the methods were considered in qualitative or categorical agreement. The overall categorical agreement improved from 83% for the prototype card to 91.5% for the modified card, and the frequency of major and very major disagreements was reduced from 7.5 to 1%, respectively. Overall agreement between the modified card and reference method for both category calls and MICs (+/- 2 dilutions) was 90%. Of the results, 67% were identical, 22% were more susceptible with the modified card, and 11% were more resistant. Reproducibility of identical or compatible category calls and MICs obtained from three trials was 94.5%. The poorest accuracy and reproducibility were observed when testing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The study suggests that the modified card can rapidly and efficiently perform susceptibility tests with an acceptable level of accuracy and reproducibility provided that the system is appropriately used for testing strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae with preset criteria for excluding organism-antibiotic combinations. The evaluation also indicates dramatic improvement in the technical performance of the modified card compared with its earlier prototype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3930559      PMCID: PMC268409          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.22.3.355-360.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Simplified storage and retrieval of stock cultures.

Authors:  J G Ngel; L J Kunz
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-04

Review 2.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST): a review of changing trends, quality control guidelines, test accuracy, and recommendation for the testing of beta-lactam drugs.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative clinical isolates with the AutoMicrobic system.

Authors:  B A Backes; S J Cavalieri; J T Rudrik; E M Britt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card.

Authors:  K G Van Horn; A M Vandernoot; E W Burke; J C McKitrick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Concurrent comparability of automated systems and commercially prepared microdilution trays for susceptibility testing.

Authors:  S L Hansen; P K Freedy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M T Kelly; J M Latimer; L C Balfour
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Clinical evaluation of new AMS GSC plus card.

Authors:  M Dudley; W F Nauschuetz; S V Juchau
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Examination of major disagreements in susceptibility test results by Autobac-1 and MS-2.

Authors:  N J Lindsey; W G Barnes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparison of two automated instrument systems for rapid susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  J E Johnson; J H Jorgensen; S A Crawford; J S Redding; R C Pruneda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of a highly automated 5-h susceptibility testing system, the Cobas-Bact, with two reference methods: Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and broth microdilution.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles; R L Heeren
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the Cobas-Bact five-hour susceptibility testing system with the NCCLS agar diffusion and dilution methods.

Authors:  J Wüst; W Heizmann; U Hardegger; B Manncke
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides and gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  J A Hindler; D A Bruckner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the Cobas Bact automated system for susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis to azlocillin, mezlocillin, and ciprofloxacin compared to NCCLS and DIN standards.

Authors:  W Heizmann; H Werner; F Heilmann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.