Literature DB >> 1147582

Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

C Thornsberry, T L Gavan, J C Sherris, A Balows, J M Matsen, L D Sabath, F Schoenknecht, L D Thrupp, J A Washington.   

Abstract

Seven laboratories participated in a collaborative study to evaluate the Autobac 1 system. Results obtained with this assay system were compared to those obtained by the standardized Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion test, and each of these two methods was compared to the agar dilution technique. Comparison of the Autobac 1 and the disk diffusion results from the seven laboratories showed an overall average of 91.5% interpretive agreement with the 17 antimicrobial agents tested. The distribution in the levels of Autobac 1/disk diffusion agreement was such that with 13 antimicrobial drugs agreement was 90% or higher; with three, between 85 and 90%; and with one, 77% (nitrofurantoin). Comparison of the Autobac 1 and disk diffusion tests with the International Collaborative Study agar dilution test showed that both methods gave levels of agreement with the International Collaborative Study agar dilution technique that were generally high and equivalent. The average overall agreement between the agar dilution test and each of the other two methods was approximately 90%. Disagreements that did occur tended to involve organisms that were drug susceptible by the Autobac 1 system but intermediate or resistant by the other two methods. This was in part due to the narrow intermediate interpretive zone of the Autobac 1 test. In reproducibility studies with the Autobac 1 and disk diffusion methods, no significant differences were observed between the interpretive reproducibility of the two methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1147582      PMCID: PMC429164          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.7.4.466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  3 in total

1.  Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study.

Authors:  H M Ericsson; J C Sherris
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1971

2.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Prototype of a fully automated device for determination of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; A Reichler; D Wiseman
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-12
  3 in total
  73 in total

1.  Rapid semiquantitative testing of antibiotic susceptibility: use of a multicell disk elution system.

Authors:  J E McGowan; C Ayres; L D Sabath
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitroSusceptibility of β-Lactamase Positive and β-Lactamase Negative Strains ofNeisseria gonorrhœœto Cefuroxime.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; J W Biddle; P L Perine; M Siegel
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1977

3.  Evaluation of the Cobas-Bact system for direct and rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative rods from positive blood culture broths.

Authors:  W Kamm; A Wenger; J Bille
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Relationship of early readings of minimal inhibitory concentrations to the results of overnight tests.

Authors:  M F Lampe; C L Aitken; P G Dennis; P S Forsythe; K E Patrick; F D Schoenknecht; J C Sherris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparison of direct and standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures.

Authors:  J E Johnson; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparison of direct and standardized disk diffusion susceptibility testing of urine cultures.

Authors:  G E Hollick; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Evaluation of Gram-stain screen and Micro-ID methods for direct identification of Enterobacteriaceae from urines.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; C C Olmstead
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  T L Overman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro activity of antimicrobial agents on Legionnaires disease bacterium.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; C N Baker; L A Kirven
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Recognition of a new serogroup of Legionnaires disease bacterium.

Authors:  R M McKinney; B M Thomason; P P Harris; L Thacker; K R Lewallen; H W Wilkinson; G A Hebert; C W Moss
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.