Literature DB >> 6783678

Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Abbott MS-2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

C Thornsberry, J P Anhalt, J A Washington, L R McCarthy, F D Schoenknecht, J C Sherris, H J Spencer.   

Abstract

The MS-2 system (Abbott Diagnostics, Division of Abbott Laboratories, Dallas, Tex.) was evaluated for its efficacy in determining the susceptibilities of both clinical and selected challenge (nonfastidious, facultative, and aerobic) isolates. The MS-2 results were compared with standard Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and microdilution results by using fresh clinical isolates. For gram-positive isolates other than enterococci, overall agreement between MS-2 and reference results was 93 to 98%. With enterococci, MS-2 agreement with disk diffusion was 68% but with microdilution was 86% (agreement between disk diffusion and microdilution was 73%). The main discrepancies with enterococci were with cephalothin, penicillin, gentamicin, and kanamycin. With clinical gram-negative isolates, the overall agreement was 91 to 93%, with most discrepancies occurring with Enterobacter spp. and beta-lactam antibiotics (MS-2 versus disk diffusion, 84%; MS-2 versus microdilution, 84%; disk diffusion versus microdilution, 87%) and with Serratia spp. and colistin (false-susceptible results). The agreement of MS-2 results with established reference antibiograms of a special collection of challenge strains was 91 to 97% for the gram-positive cocci and 86 to 98% for the gram-negative strains. (With Enterobacter spp., agreement was 86%, but was greater than 90% for all other organism groups.) Of the 98 finite MS-2 minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) that could be directly compared with microdilution MICs, 77 (79%) were within +/- 1 well of the geometric mean microdilution MIC. MS-2 analysis time ranged from 2.8 to 6.5 h (mean, 4.2 h). On the basis of these results, we conclude that the MS-2 can be expected to yield rapid and accurate results with most nonfastidious, facultative, and aerobic pathogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6783678      PMCID: PMC273593          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.12.3.375-390.1980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; T L Gavan; J C Sherris; A Balows; J M Matsen; L D Sabath; F Schoenknecht; L D Thrupp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Letter: Automated sensitivity tests.

Authors:  P M Waterworth
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  In vitro response of Enterobacter to ampicillin.

Authors:  M F Lampe; B H Minshew; J C Sherris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Prototype of a fully automated device for determination of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; A Reichler; D Wiseman
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-12
  5 in total
  35 in total

1.  Evaluation of the automated phoenix system for potential routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  J-L Donay; D Mathieu; P Fernandes; C Prégermain; P Bruel; A Wargnier; I Casin; F X Weill; P H Lagrange; J L Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the Cobas-Bact system for direct and rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative rods from positive blood culture broths.

Authors:  W Kamm; A Wenger; J Bille
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Direct disk diffusion test using European Clinical Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints provides reliable results compared with the standard method.

Authors:  Sofia Stokkou; Gernot Geginat; Dirk Schlüter; Ina Tammer
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2015-03-26

4.  Comparison of a highly automated 5-h susceptibility testing system, the Cobas-Bact, with two reference methods: Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and broth microdilution.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles; R L Heeren
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid, automated identification of novobiocin-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  C M Mendes; L F Siqueira; W Francisco
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Correlation between growth curve and killing curve of Escherichia coli after a brief exposure to suprainhibitory concentrations of ampicillin and piperacillin.

Authors:  E Yourassowsky; M P Van der Linden; M J Lismont; F Crokaert; Y Glupczynski
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Successful use of broth microdilution in susceptibility tests for methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) staphylococci.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; L K McDougal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Reliability of the MS-2 system in detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Boyce; R L White; M C Bonner; W R Lockwood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility testing with Abbott MS-2 system.

Authors:  J R Carlson; F E Conley; D L Cahall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of two automated instrument systems for rapid susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  J E Johnson; J H Jorgensen; S A Crawford; J S Redding; R C Pruneda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.