Literature DB >> 436986

Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems.

D Lehmann, W Skrandies.   

Abstract

Scalp potential fields in human subjects were evoked by checkerboard reversals to the upper and lower hermiretinae, using 1.6 and 3.2 reversals/s. Averaged fields were sampled along a saggital midline row of electrodes (field profiles) in 20 subjects, and from a 47 electrode array (field maps) in five subjects. In five subjects, profile peaks and troughs between 84 and 128 ms latency resided within the recorded electrode row surrounded by lesser potential values, and thus met the evaluation criteria. Response latency defined as maximal voltage difference between two electrodes within the profiles was significantly shorter (medians 12 and 11 ms, respectively) for upper than for lower hemiretina stimuli at both frequencies. There was a significant difference between latencies to 3.2 and 1.6 stimuli/s in the upper but not in the lower hemiretina system, suggesting different system behavior of the two retinal halves. Pertinent anatomical, electrophysiological, and behavioral data are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 436986     DOI: 10.1007/bf00236791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  11 in total

1.  FIGURAL AFTER-EFFECTS: DISPLACEMENT OR CONTRAST?

Authors:  R B FREEMAN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1964-12

2.  Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co-ordinates and optics.

Authors:  P O BISHOP; W KOZAK; G J VAKKUR
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Letter: Peripheral visual acuity in the vertical plane.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Multichannel topography of human alpha EEG fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-11

5.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys; J G Axford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The histology of retinas from the Pinnipedia.

Authors:  D Landau; W W Dawson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W F Michael
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  [Methods and evaluation of visually evoked EEG potentials in cases of suspected multiple sclerosis (author's transl)].

Authors:  D Lehmann; Z Mir
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1976-08-06       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Average multichannel EEG potential fields evoked from upper and lower hemi-retina: latency differences.

Authors:  D Lehman; H P Meles; Z Mir
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-11

10.  Visual reaction times on a circle about the fovea.

Authors:  W H Payne
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  20 in total

1.  Sensitivity distribution in the central and midperipheral visual field determined by pattern electroretinography and harmonic analysis.

Authors:  R Marx; E Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Event-related potential components N1, P2 and P3 to rare and frequent stimuli in intellectually impaired neurological patients.

Authors:  K Hirata; I Pal; D Lehmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Attentional load modifies early activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Karsten S Rauss; Gilles Pourtois; Patrik Vuilleumier; Sophie Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically-mapped stimulus locations.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Eric Halgren; Antigona Martinez; Mingxiong Huang; Steven A Hillyard; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The origin of pattern reversal short latency visual evoked potential as determined by dynamic topography and the dipole tracing method.

Authors:  S Kawashima; Y Kobayashi; O Nishikiori; A Tabuchi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Hemiretinal stimuli elicit different amplitudes in the pattern electroretinogram.

Authors:  M Yoshii; A Päärmann
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Different scalp localization of pattern onset and reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  W R Biersdorf
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Check size and defocusing effects on equipotential maps of pattern-evoked electroretinograms.

Authors:  E Adachi-Usami; N Kuroda; Y Kakisu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Improved method for retinotopy constrained source estimation of visual-evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.