Literature DB >> 72652

Average multichannel EEG potential fields evoked from upper and lower hemi-retina: latency differences.

D Lehman, H P Meles, Z Mir.   

Abstract

Checkerboard reversals shown to the upper hemiretina evoke EEG potentials which in anterior-posterior derivations are approximately inverted in polarity compared with potentials evoked by lower hemiretinal stimulation. Using a 48-channel system, EEG scalp field distributions of such responses were mapped. Examination of the map sequences shows that occipital positive maximal field values start to develop at about the same time in the two stimulus conditions, but peak much earlier and somewhat more anteriorly for upper than for lower hemiretinal stimulation. Thus, there is a difference of response latency in the two conditions, which accounts for the approximate inversion of polarity. Possible correlations with reports of higher receptor cell density, higher visual acuity, and shorter motor reaction time of the upper hemiretinal system are noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 72652     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90087-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  13 in total

Review 1.  Past, present and future of topographic mapping.

Authors:  D Lehmann
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Event-related potential components N1, P2 and P3 to rare and frequent stimuli in intellectually impaired neurological patients.

Authors:  K Hirata; I Pal; D Lehmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Quantitative electroencephalograms and neuro-optometry: a case study that explores changes in electrophysiology while wearing therapeutic eyeglasses.

Authors:  Deborah Zelinsky; Corey Feinberg
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.593

5.  Dynamic topography of pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) in psychogenic visual loss patients.

Authors:  A Nakamura; A Tabuchi; E Matsuda; W Yamaguchi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Time range analysis of evoked potential fields.

Authors:  W Skrandies
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Electrophysiological and pathological studies on Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with retinal involvement.

Authors:  J Tsutsui; S Kawashima; I Kajikawa; T Shirabe; A Terao
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Visual evoked responses to the upper and lower half-field stimulation in a dark-adapted man.

Authors:  J Peregrin; I Pastrnáková; A Pastrnák
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1978-08-25       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Monocular and binocular evoked average potential field topography: upper and lower hemiretinal stimuli.

Authors:  E Adachi-Usami; D Lehmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Localization of visually evoked cortical activity in humans.

Authors:  R Srebro
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.