Literature DB >> 3428085

Different scalp localization of pattern onset and reversal visual evoked potentials.

W R Biersdorf1.   

Abstract

Visual evoked potentials were recorded monopolarly from seven electrodes on a horizontal line from T3 to T4 and bipolarly in one channel from left of the midline to right of the midline. Stimulation of the right and left half-fields was performed with a checkerboard generator of 10 degrees x 13.5 degrees and checks of various sizes at high contrast. The results may be summarized as follows: 1. Source-sink analysis for lateral half-field pattern onset with small checks shows C1, peaking about 80 msec, to have a source on the scalp contralateral to the half-field stimulated with a sink on the midline. 2. To half-field pattern reversal, bipolar recording across the scalp midline indicates an early phase reversal peaking about 80 msec followed by another phase reversal peaking at about P100 latency. Source-sink analysis indicates the first reversal has a contralateral source, while the second has a source on the scalp midline or ipsilateral to the field stimulated. 3. Pattern reversal results vary with check size, with a smaller check size increasing the amplitude of the first phase reversal and decreasing the amplitude of the second.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3428085     DOI: 10.1007/BF00213659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  9 in total

1.  A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked response.

Authors:  G Barett; L Blumhardt; A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Source derivation of the visual evoked response to pattern reversal stimulation.

Authors:  R A Clement; J G Flanagan; G F Harding
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01

3.  The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.

Authors:  L D Blumhardt; G Barrett; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys; J G Axford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Localization of the human visual evoked response. Early components specific to visual stimulation.

Authors:  Z Nakamura; W R Biersdorf
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Source derivation of the visually evoked potential.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; G F Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Spatio-temporal study of visual evoked potentials in patients with homonymous hemianopia.

Authors:  F Chain; N Lesevre; J F Pinel; M Leblanc
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1982

8.  An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations.

Authors:  B Hjorth
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-11

9.  Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Pattern flash visual evoked potentials in patients with homonymous hemianopia.

Authors:  W R Biersdorf; R A Bell; R W Beck
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Siân E Handley; Maja Šuštar; Manca Tekavčič Pompe
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.