Literature DB >> 2806033

Hemiretinal stimuli elicit different amplitudes in the pattern electroretinogram.

M Yoshii1, A Päärmann.   

Abstract

Pattern electroretinograms were elicited in 13 normal eyes by half-field checkerboard stimulation of nasal-temporal and upper-lower retinal areas. With nasal-temporal visual half-field stimulation the p-q component amplitude of the nasal hemiretina was significantly larger than that of the temporal hemiretina. With upper-lower visual half-field stimulation the amplitude was significantly larger for the upper than for the lower hemiretina. No significant differences were found with respect to the component latency. Finding the p-q amplitude of the pattern electroretinogram to be closely related to the distribution of nerve cells in the innermost retinal layer supports the conclusion that the pattern response is generated in the more proximal retinal layers including the retinal ganglion cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2806033     DOI: 10.1007/bf00155210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  14 in total

1.  The relation between the after-negative potential of the pattern electroretinogram and the visually evoked cortical potential.

Authors:  K Yanashima; M Yoshii; S Okisaka
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07-15       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Letter: Peripheral visual acuity in the vertical plane.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Formation of retinal ganglion cell topography during prenatal development.

Authors:  B Lia; R W Williams; L M Chalupa
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Monocular and binocular evoked average potential field topography: upper and lower hemiretinal stimuli.

Authors:  E Adachi-Usami; D Lehmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Electroretinographic responses and retrograde changes of retinal morphology after intracranial optic nerve section. A quantitative analysis in the cat.

Authors:  H Holländer; S Bisti; L Maffei; R Hebel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini; S Bisti; H Holländer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: implications for central magnification factors.

Authors:  V H Perry; A Cowey
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contribution of two movement detecting mechanisms to central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  I Murray; F MacCana; J J Kulikowski
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The standing potential of the human eye reflects differences between upper and lower retinal areas.

Authors:  W Skrandies; M Baier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Senescence of human multifocal electroretinogram components: a localized approach.

Authors:  Radouil T Tzekov; Christina Gerth; John S Werner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Quadrant pattern ERG with SLO stimulation in normals and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  F Horn; C Mardin; M Korth; P Martus
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Pattern electroretinography in senile macular degeneration.

Authors:  D G Sanders; G H Van Lith
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Differential vertical visual latency as determined with a simultaneity paradigm.

Authors:  Shephali Patel; Steven H Schwartz; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Compartmental Differences in Macular Retinal Ganglion Cell Function.

Authors:  Diego Alba; Amy M Huang; Shiva Roghaee; Akil Hinds; Maja Kostic; Tsung-Han Chou; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.