Literature DB >> 2637117

Sensitivity distribution in the central and midperipheral visual field determined by pattern electroretinography and harmonic analysis.

R Marx1, E Zrenner.   

Abstract

To investigate the value of the extrafoveal pattern electroretinogram for evaluation of local retinal defects, electroretinographic responses to contrast reversal stimulation were recorded at various locations in the central and midperipheral retina. Normal values were established in 20 eyes, and spatial selectivity at different retinal eccentricities was determined in four eyes. The response amplitude was found to decrease steeply from the fovea until about 12 degrees eccentricity and to decline only slowly thereafter. For central stimulation a clear attenuation for coarser patterns was observed. At 20 degrees and at 30 degrees eccentricity the spatial tuning function exhibited a bandpass characteristic, with the maximum amplitude shifting to lower spatial frequencies. Despite the relatively low peripheral amplitudes a satisfactory signal to noise ratio of the second harmonic responses can be obtained by Fourier analysis, which improves clinical applicability. The comparison of sensitivity in the upper and lower retina revealed a considerable asymmetry, with responses in the upper retina approximately 20% higher. No significant difference, however, was found when the temporal or nasal retina was stimulated. The reproducibility of these results is high enough to encourage clinical studies. A case of retinal venous branch occlusion exemplifies the applicability of this technique in eccentric fundus lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2637117     DOI: 10.1007/bf00154490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  28 in total

1.  Electrical Responses of the Human Eye to Moving Stimulus Patterns.

Authors:  L A Riggs; E P Johnson; A M Schick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Naso-temporal asymmetry of visual perception and of the visual cortex.

Authors:  M Fahle; M Schmid
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  [Site of electroretinographic responses to pattern reversal and brightness stimuli in individual layers of the primate retina].

Authors:  E Zrenner; C L Baker; R F Hess; B T Olsen
Journal:  Fortschr Ophthalmol       Date:  1987

4.  [Pathology of arterial and venous occlusive diseases of the retina (author's transl)].

Authors:  B Daicker
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram.

Authors:  R F Hess; C L Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini; S Bisti; H Holländer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: implications for central magnification factors.

Authors:  V H Perry; A Cowey
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceptive field size in fovea and periphery of the light- and dark-adapted retina.

Authors:  A Ransom-Hogg; L Spillmann
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The standing potential of the human eye reflects differences between upper and lower retinal areas.

Authors:  W Skrandies; M Baier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings in the cat.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quadrant pattern ERG with SLO stimulation in normals and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  F Horn; C Mardin; M Korth; P Martus
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.117

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.