Literature DB >> 17225976

Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.

Zachary M Smith1, Bertrand Delgutte.   

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implantation seeks to restore the advantages of binaural hearing to the profoundly deaf by providing binaural cues normally important for accurate sound localization and speech reception in noise. Psychophysical observations suggest that a key issue for the implementation of a successful binaural prosthesis is the ability to match the cochlear positions of stimulation channels in each ear. We used a cat model of bilateral cochlear implants with eight-electrode arrays implanted in each cochlea to develop and test a noninvasive method based on evoked potentials for matching interaural electrodes. The arrays allowed the cochlear location of stimulation to be independently varied in each ear. The binaural interaction component (BIC) of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) was used as an assay of binaural processing. BIC amplitude peaked for interaural electrode pairs at the same relative cochlear position and dropped with increasing cochlear separation in either direction. To test the hypothesis that BIC amplitude peaks when electrodes from the two sides activate maximally overlapping neural populations, we measured multiunit neural activity along the tonotopic gradient of the inferior colliculus (IC) with 16-channel recording probes and determined the spatial pattern of IC activation for each stimulating electrode. We found that the interaural electrode pairings that produced the best aligned IC activation patterns were also those that yielded maximum BIC amplitude. These results suggest that EABR measurements may provide a method for assigning frequency-channel mappings in bilateral implant recipients, such as pediatric patients, for which psychophysical measures of pitch ranking or binaural fusion are unavailable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17225976      PMCID: PMC1907379          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0069-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  35 in total

1.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.

Authors:  Deniz Baskent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Gabor analysis of auditory midbrain receptive fields: spectro-temporal and binaural composition.

Authors:  Anqi Qiu; Christoph E Schreiner; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Donald K Eddington; H Steven Colburn; William M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of stimulus level on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  Kevin H Franck; Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-07-16

6.  Speech reception thresholds obtained in a symmetrical four-loudspeaker arrangement from bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants.

Authors:  Franz Schön; Joachim Müller; Jan Helms
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Auditory brain stem responses evoked by lateralized clicks: is lateralization extracted in the human brain stem?

Authors:  Helmut Riedel; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli; Carol Sammeth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  24 in total

1.  Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Matthew C Schoenecker; Ben H Bonham; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22

Review 2.  [The binaural interaction component: a clinically useful diagnostic instrument?].

Authors:  W Delb
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Payton Lin; Thomas Lu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Benjamin Kirby; Carolyn Brown; Paul Abbas; Christine Etler; Sara O'Brien
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Self-Selection of Frequency Tables with Bilateral Mismatches in an Acoustic Simulation of a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Ksenia Prosolovich; Chin-Tuan Tan; E Katelyn Glassman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Infrared neural stimulation: beam path in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  Laura E Moreno; Suhrud M Rajguru; Agnella Izzo Matic; Nitin Yerram; Alan M Robinson; Margaret Hwang; Stuart Stock; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.