Literature DB >> 18037252

Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Russell L Snyder1, John C Middlebrooks, Ben H Bonham.   

Abstract

The multichannel design of contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) is predicated on the assumption that each channel activates a relatively restricted and independent sector of the deaf auditory nerve array, just as a sound within a restricted frequency band activates a restricted region of the normal cochlea The independence of CI channels, however, is limited; and the factors that determine their independence, the relative overlap of the activity patterns that they evoke, are poorly understood. In this study, we evaluate the spread of activity evoked by cochlear implant channels by monitoring activity at 16 sites along the tonotopic axis of the guinea pig inferior colliculus (IC). "Spatial tuning curves" (STCs) measured in this way serve as an estimate of activation spread within the cochlea and the ascending auditory pathways. We contrast natural stimulation using acoustic tones with two kinds of electrical stimulation either (1) a loose fitting banded array consisting of a cylindrical silicone elastomer carrier with a linear series of ring contacts; or (2) a space-filling array consisting of a tapered silicone elastomer carrier that is designed to fit snugly into the guinea pig scala tympani with a linear series of ball contacts positioned along it Spatial tuning curves evoked by individual acoustic tones, and by activation of each contact of each array as a monopole, bipole or tripole were recorded. Several channel configurations and a wide range of electrode separations were tested for each array, and their thresholds and selectivity were estimated. The results indicate that the tapered space-filling arrays evoked more restricted activity patterns at lower thresholds than did the banded arrays. Monopolar stimulation (one intracochlear contact activated with an extracochlear return) using either array evoked broad activation patterns that involved the entire recording array at current levels <6dBSL, but at relatively low thresholds. Bi- and tri-polar configurations of both array types evoked more restricted activity patterns, but their thresholds were higher than those of monopolar configurations. Bipolar and tripolar configurations with closely spaced contacts evoked activity patterns that were comparable to those evoked by pure tones. As the spacing of bipolar electrodes was increased (separations >1mm), the activity patterns became broader and evoked patterns with two distinct threshold minima, one associated with each contact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18037252      PMCID: PMC2387102          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  63 in total

1.  Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays.

Authors:  M Tykocinski; L T Cohen; B C Pyman; T Roland; C Treaba; J Palamara; M C Dahm; R K Shepherd; J Xu; R S Cowan; N L Cohen; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-03

2.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability.

Authors:  F Rattay; R N Leao; H Felix
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Cochlear implant thresholds: comparison of middle latency responses with psychophysical and cortical-spike-activity thresholds.

Authors:  A L Miller; J G Arenberg; J C Middlebrooks; B E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation.

Authors:  S J Rebscher; R L Snyder; P A Leake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array.

Authors:  L T Cohen; E Saunders; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  P A Leake; R L Snyder; S J Rebscher; C M Moore; M Vollmer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  J J Briaire; J H Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The contour electrode array: safety study and initial patient trials of a new perimodiolar design.

Authors:  M Tykocinski; E Saunders; L T Cohen; C Treaba; R J Briggs; P Gibson; G M Clark; R S Cowan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Response properties of neurons in the central nucleus and external and dorsal cortices of the inferior colliculus in guinea pig.

Authors:  J Syka; J Popelár; E Kvasnák; J Astl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location.

Authors:  P A Leake; R L Snyder; G T Hradek; S J Rebscher
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  36 in total

1.  Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Matthew C Schoenecker; Ben H Bonham; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22

Review 2.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Steven M Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.

Authors:  Pengjia Cao; Jingjing Sun; Yan Yan; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Xiaodong Sun; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Authors:  Ben H Bonham; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Heather A Kreft; Elizabeth S Anderson; Gail S Donaldson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of electrode configuration on cochlear implant modulation detection thresholds.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Chronic neurotrophin delivery promotes ectopic neurite growth from the spiral ganglion of deafened cochleae without compromising the spatial selectivity of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Thomas G Landry; James B Fallon; Andrew K Wise; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.