Literature DB >> 22722899

Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.

Matthew C Schoenecker1, Ben H Bonham, Olga A Stakhovskaya, Russell L Snyder, Patricia A Leake.   

Abstract

Previous cochlear implant studies using isolated electrical stimulus pulses in animal models have reported that intracochlear monopolar stimulus configurations elicit broad extents of neuronal activation within the central auditory system-much broader than the activation patterns produced by bipolar electrode pairs or acoustic tones. However, psychophysical and speech reception studies that use sustained pulse trains do not show clear performance differences for monopolar versus bipolar configurations. To test whether monopolar intracochlear stimulation can produce selective activation of the inferior colliculus, we measured activation widths along the tonotopic axis of the inferior colliculus for acoustic tones and 1,000-pulse/s electrical pulse trains in guinea pigs and cats. Electrical pulse trains were presented using an array of 6-12 stimulating electrodes distributed longitudinally on a space-filling silicone carrier positioned in the scala tympani of the cochlea. We found that for monopolar, bipolar, and acoustic stimuli, activation widths were significantly narrower for sustained responses than for the transient response to the stimulus onset. Furthermore, monopolar and bipolar stimuli elicited similar activation widths when compared at stimulus levels that produced similar peak spike rates. Surprisingly, we found that in guinea pigs, monopolar and bipolar stimuli produced narrower sustained activation than 60 dB sound pressure level acoustic tones when compared at stimulus levels that produced similar peak spike rates. Therefore, we conclude that intracochlear electrical stimulation using monopolar pulse trains can produce activation patterns that are at least as selective as bipolar or acoustic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22722899      PMCID: PMC3441950          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0333-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  51 in total

1.  Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  P A Leake; G T Hradek; R L Snyder
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-10-04       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation.

Authors:  S J Rebscher; R L Snyder; P A Leake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  A new method of calculating auditory excitation patterns and loudness for steady sounds.

Authors:  Zhangli Chen; Guangshu Hu; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. II. Repetition rate coding.

Authors:  C E Schreiner; M W Raggio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Multi-unit mapping of acoustic stimuli in gerbil inferior colliculus.

Authors:  D M Harris; R V Shannon; R Snyder; E Carney
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander M Hetherington; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  Loudness summation using focused and unfocused electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; François Guérit; John M Deeks; Andrew Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Simone R de Rijk; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.