| Literature DB >> 36235560 |
Shou-En Wu1, Ying-Jen Chen2, Wei-Liang Chen3,4,5.
Abstract
Diets for healthy aging have long been an intriguing issue. The current study makes a head-to-head comparison of four dietary patterns and their associations with soluble Klotho (s-Klotho) levels, an aging-related marker. The dietary data of 7906 subjects were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2016. Each participant was given a score or was grouped according to four dietary patterns, namely the Mediterranean adherence diet score (MDS), the low-carbohydrate-diet score, a low-fat diet, and a low-carbohydrate diet. Subsequently, the associations with s-Klotho were examined using linear regression analyses. In addition, we calculated the odds ratio (OR) for aging in different dietary patterns, taking the lowest quartile of s-Klotho as a reference for aging. The MDS was the only dietary pattern that revealed a relationship with s-Klotho levels. The positive association (β coefficient: 9.41, p < 0.001) remained significant when dividing the MDS into tertiles (Tertile 2: β coefficient: 36.87, p < 0.001; Tertile 3: β coefficient: 45.92, p < 0.001) and grouping participants into subsets by sex, age, and BMI. A lower OR for aging was observed in higher MDS groups (Tertile 2: OR = 0.86, p = 0.026; Tertile 3: OR = 0.77, p < 0.001). However, when analyzed separately, merely three out of nine components of the MDS, namely alcohol consumption (β coefficient: 42.54, p < 0.001), fruit (β coefficient: 11.59, p = 0.029), and dairy products (β coefficient: 8.55, p = 0.032), showed a significant association with s-Klotho. The Mediterranean diet adopts a food-based approach, which has the merit of valuing the complex interactions between foods and their constituents, and further brings benefits to healthy aging.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; aging; low-carbohydrate diet; low-fat diet; soluble Klotho
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235560 PMCID: PMC9573612 DOI: 10.3390/nu14193910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Flow chart of study population selection.
The definition and calculation method of four dietary patterns in the present study.
| Mediterranean Adherence Diet Score (MDS) | Low-Carbohydrate-Diet Score (LCD) | Low-Fat Diet | Low-Carbohydrate Diet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | A score ranging from 0–18 by adding up nine components. | A score ranging from 0–30 by adding up individual scores of three macronutrients, carbohydrate, protein, and fat. | <30% of total daily calorie intake from fat | <20% of total daily calorie intake from carbohydrate | |||||
| Each component is assigned a score of “0”, “1”, or “2” according to the amount of intake. | Each macronutrient was calculated as a percentage (%) of total daily energy intake, and further divided into 11 strata. | ||||||||
| Calculation method | Scores | 0 | 1 | 2 | Scores | Carbohydrate | Protein/Fat | ||
| Fruit | <1 CE/d | ≥1 CE/d | ≥2 CE/d | 0 | 11th stratum | 1st stratum | |||
| Vegetables | <0.5 CE/d | ≥0.5 CE/d | ≥1 CE/d | 1 | 10th stratum | 2nd stratum | |||
| 1 portion = 70 g = 2.5 oz | 2 | 9th stratum | 3rd stratum | ||||||
| Cereals | <4.6 oz/d | 4.6–6.9 oz/d | >6.9 oz/d | 3 | 8th stratum | 4th stratum | |||
| 1 portion = 130 g = 4.6 oz | 4 | 7th stratum | 5th stratum | ||||||
| Fish | <3.5 oz/wk | 3.5–8.75 oz/wk | >8.75 oz/wk | 5 | 6th stratum | 6th stratum | |||
| 1 portion = 100 g = 3.5 oz | 6 | 5th stratum | 7th stratum | ||||||
| Meat product | >4.2 oz/d | 2.8–4.2 oz/d | <2.8 oz/d | 7 | 4th stratum | 8th stratum | |||
| 1 portion = 80 g = 2.8 oz | 8 | 3rd stratum | 9th stratum | ||||||
| Dairy products | >1.5 CE/d | 1–1.5 CE/d | <1 CE/d | 9 | 2nd stratum | 10th stratum | |||
| Alcohol (mL/day) | >2 AU/d | <1 AU/d | 1–2 AU/d | 10 | 1st stratum | 11th stratum | |||
| 1 AU = 12 g | |||||||||
| Olive oil (gm) | <14 g/d | ≥14 g/d | ≥28 g/d | ||||||
| CE = cup equivalent intakes; d = day; wk = week; gm = gram; mL = milliliter; oz = ounce | |||||||||
| References | Previous literature by Sofi et al. [ | Previous literature by Halton et al. [ | American Heart Association Dietary Guidelines [ | American Academy of Family Physicians [ | |||||
Characteristics of participants.
| Characteristics | Total Participants ( |
|---|---|
| 2 Continuous variables | |
| Age (years) | 57.77 ± 10.92 |
| 1 BMI (kg/m2) | 29.67 ± 6.54 |
| Klotho (pg/mL) | 861.17 ± 311.55 |
| Mediterranean diet score | 6.72 ± 2.12 |
| Low-carbohydrate diet score | 14.98 ± 7.19 |
| Daily carbohydrate intake (gm)/Percentage of calories from carbohydrate | 245.50 ± 116.27 (49%) |
| Daily protein intake (gm)/Percentage of calories from protein | 78.67 ± 39.30 (16%) |
| Daily fat intake (gm)/Percentage of calories from fat | 76.10 ± 43.96 (34%) |
| Daily calorie intake (kcal) | 2020.97 ± 923.62 |
| 3 Categorical variables | |
| Sex | |
| Men | 3910 (49.5%) |
| Women | 3996 (50.5%) |
| Race | |
| Mexican American | 1225 (15.5%) |
| Other Hispanic | 855 (10.8%) |
| Non-Hispanic White | 3704 (46.9%) |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 1619 (20.5%) |
| Other race, including multi-racial | 503 (6.4%) |
| History of congestive heart failure | 312 (3.9%) |
| History of coronary heart disease | 392 (5%) |
| History of angina | 254 (3.2%) |
| History of diabetes mellitus | 6705 (84.8%) |
| History of hypertension | 5433 (68.7%) |
| Smoking history | 3987 (50.4%) |
1 BMI: body mass index. 2 Values in the continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation. 3 Values in the categorical variables were expressed in number and percentage (%).
Linear regression analyses for the associations between different dietary patterns and serum klotho levels.
| 1 MDS | 2 LCD Score | Low-Fat Diet | 3 Low-Carb Diet | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Score | Tertile | Total Score | Decile | ||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 | ||||||
| Model 1 | β coefficient | 9.41 | Ref. | 36.87 | 45.92 | −0.366 (−1.355, 0.623) | Ref. | 1.45 | −6.32 | −2.16 | −96.08 (−202.49, 10.32) |
| <0.001 | Ref. | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.468 | Ref. | 0.894 | 0.573 | 0.775 | 0.077 | ||
| Model 2 | β coefficient | 9.62 | Ref. | 37.38 | 46.79 | −0.116 (−1.106, 0.873) | Ref. | 5.24 | −1.16 | −2.58 | −95.37 (−201.14, 10.39) |
| <0.001 | Ref. | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.818 | Ref. | 0.627 | 0.917 | 0.732 | 0.077 | ||
| Model 3 | β coefficient | 9.01 | Ref. | 35.92 | 43.42 | −0.200 (−1.188, 0.788) | Ref. | 3.76 | −2.56 | −1.80 | −103.54 (−208.98, 1.89) |
| <0.001 | Ref. | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.691 | Ref. | 0.727 | 0.819 | 0.811 | 0.054 | ||
1 MDS: Mediterranean diet adherence score; 2 LCD score: low-carbohydrate-diet score; 3 Low-carb diet: low-carbohydrate diet. Model 1 = unadjusted. Model 2 = adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and race/ethnicity. Model 3 = Model 2 + adjusted for history of angina, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and smoking history.
Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for lowest quartile of serum Klotho levels (represents aging) in various dietary patterns.
| 1 MDS | 2 LCD Score | Low-Fat Diet | 3 Low-Carb Diet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile | Decile | ||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 | ||||
| Model 1 | OR | Ref. | 0.86 | 0.77 | Ref. | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.01 | 1.50 |
| Ref. | 0.026 | <0.001 | Ref. | 0.653 | 0.648 | 0.867 | 0.271 | ||
| Model 2 | OR | Ref. | 0.85 | 0.76 | Ref. | 0.95 | 0.94 | 1.01 | 1.52 |
| Ref. | 0.017 | <0.001 | Ref. | 0.512 | 0.478 | 0.929 | 0.260 | ||
| Model 3 | OR | Ref. | 0.86 | 0.77 | Ref. | 0.96 | 0.95 | 1.01 | 1.58 |
| Ref. | 0.024 | <0.001 | Ref. | 0.956 | 0.949 | 0.933 | 0.217 | ||
1 MDS: Mediterranean diet adherence score; 2 LCD score: low-carbohydrate-diet score; 3 Low-carb diet: low-carbohydrate diet. Model 1 = unadjusted. Model 2 = adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and race/ethnicity. Model 3 = Model 2 + adjusted for history of angina, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and smoking history.
Associations across tertiles of Mediterranean diet score and serum Klotho levels in subgroups.
| Tertile 1 | Tertile 2 | Tertile 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorted by sex | ||||
| Men | ||||
| Model 1 | β coefficient | Ref. | 26.62 | 43.48 |
| Ref. | 0.020 | <0.001 | ||
| Model 2 | β coefficient | Ref. | 29.73 | 49.59 |
| Ref. | 0.009 | <0.001 | ||
| Model 3 | β coefficient | Ref. | 27.81 | 45.31 |
| Ref. | 0.015 | <0.001 | ||
| Women | ||||
| Model 1 | β coefficient | Ref. | 41.01 | 40.28 |
| Ref. | 0.004 | 0.004 | ||
| Model 2 | β coefficient | Ref. | 45.34 | 45.01 |
| Ref. | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||
| Model 3 | β coefficient | Ref. | 43.22 | 41.23 |
| Ref. | 0.002 | 0.003 | ||
| Sorted by age | ||||
| <65 years old | ||||
| Model 1 | β coefficient | Ref. | 33.44 | 48.38 |
| Ref. | 0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Model 2 | β coefficient | Ref. | 31.58 | 45.22 |
| Ref. | 0.003 | <0.001 | ||
| Model 3 | β coefficient | Ref. | 30.59 | 40.19 |
| Ref. | 0.003 | <0.001 | ||
| ≥65 years old | ||||
| Model 1 | β coefficient | Ref. | 55.30 | 55.75 |
| Ref. | 0.002 | 0.001 | ||
| Model 2 | β coefficient | Ref. | 53.87 | 52.40 |
| Ref. | 0.002 | 0.003 | ||
| Model 3 | β coefficient | Ref. | 51.03 | 49.61 |
| Ref. | 0.004 | 0.004 | ||
| Sorted by BMI | ||||
| BMI < 30 | ||||
| Model 1 | β coefficient | Ref. | 29.98 | 40.56 |
| Ref. | 0.012 | 0.001 | ||
| Model 2 | β coefficient | Ref. | 31.09 | 40.98 |
| Ref. | 0.009 | 0.001 | ||
| Model 3 | β coefficient | Ref. | 27.93 | 36.67 |
| Ref. | 0.018 | 0.002 | ||
| BMI ≥ 30 | ||||
| Model 1 | β coefficient | Ref. | 46.82 | 53.69 |
| Ref. | 0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Model 2 | β coefficient | Ref. | 45.52 | 54.14 |
| Ref. | 0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Model 3 | β coefficient | Ref. | 46.29 | 51.86 |
| Ref. | 0.001 | <0.001 | ||
1 MDS: Mediterranean diet adherence score. Model 1 = unadjusted. Model 2 = adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and race/ethnicity. Model 3 = Model 2 + adjusted for history of angina, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and smoking history.
Figure 2A line chart showing the change of mean s-Klotho levels in Mediterranean diet adherence score from the lowest (score ≤ 1) to the highest (score ≥ 12).
Figure 3Forest plot of β coefficients presenting the association between nine components in the Mediterranean diet adherence score and s-Klotho levels as outcome. The β coefficient discloses the degree of change in s-Klotho levels for each 1-score increase in an individual component. Components that revealed significant associations are highlighted in bold.