Shreya Chawla1, Fernanda Tessarolo Silva2, Sofia Amaral Medeiros2, Rania A Mekary3,4, Dina Radenkovic5. 1. Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK. 2. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, BR, Brazil. 3. School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, MA 02120, USA. 4. Nutrition Department, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02120, USA. 5. HOOKE London, 11-15 Farm Street, London W1J 5RG, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rise in obesity has emphasised a focus on lifestyle and dietary habits. We aimed to address the debate between low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets and compare their effects on body weight, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), total cholesterol, and triglycerides in an adult population. METHOD: Medline and Web of Science were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets up to September 2019. Three independent reviewers extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. The meta-analysis was stratified by follow-up time using the random-effects models. RESULTS: This meta-analysis of 38 studies assessed a total of 6499 adults. At 6-12 months, pooled analyses of mean differences of low-carbohydrate vs. low-fat diets favoured the low-carbohydrate diet for average weight change (mean difference -1.30 kg; 95% CI -2.02 to -0.57), HDL (0.05 mmol/L; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.08), and triglycerides (TG) (-0.10 mmol/L; -0.16 to -0.04), and favoured the low-fat diet for LDL (0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.12) and total cholesterol (0.10 mmol/L; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.18). Conclusion and Relevance: This meta-analysis suggests that low-carbohydrate diets are effective at improving weight loss, HDL and TG lipid profiles. However, this must be balanced with potential consequences of raised LDL and total cholesterol in the long-term.
BACKGROUND: The rise in obesity has emphasised a focus on lifestyle and dietary habits. We aimed to address the debate between low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets and compare their effects on body weight, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), total cholesterol, and triglycerides in an adult population. METHOD: Medline and Web of Science were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets up to September 2019. Three independent reviewers extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. The meta-analysis was stratified by follow-up time using the random-effects models. RESULTS: This meta-analysis of 38 studies assessed a total of 6499 adults. At 6-12 months, pooled analyses of mean differences of low-carbohydrate vs. low-fat diets favoured the low-carbohydrate diet for average weight change (mean difference -1.30 kg; 95% CI -2.02 to -0.57), HDL (0.05 mmol/L; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.08), and triglycerides (TG) (-0.10 mmol/L; -0.16 to -0.04), and favoured the low-fat diet for LDL (0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.12) and total cholesterol (0.10 mmol/L; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.18). Conclusion and Relevance: This meta-analysis suggests that low-carbohydrate diets are effective at improving weight loss, HDL and TGlipid profiles. However, this must be balanced with potential consequences of raised LDL and total cholesterol in the long-term.
Authors: Katarzyna Nabrdalik; Katarzyna Krzyżak; Weronika Hajzler; Karolina Drożdż; Hanna Kwiendacz; Janusz Gumprecht; Gregory Y H Lip Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Mohamed K Seyam; Mazen Alqahtani; Mohamed Sherif Sirajudeen; Hariraja Muthusamy; Faizan Z Kashoo; Mukhtar M Salah Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Cristina Lugones-Sánchez; José I Recio-Rodríguez; Marta Menéndez-Suárez; Alicia Saz-Lara; José I Ramirez-Manent; María A Sánchez-Calavera; Leticia Gómez-Sánchez; Emiliano Rodríguez-Sánchez; Luis García-Ortiz Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-01-09 Impact factor: 5.717