| Literature DB >> 35813123 |
Deepti Pradhan1, Lalit Agarwal2, Ichhya Joshi2, Anamika Kushwaha2, Kshitij Aditya3, Archana Kumari4.
Abstract
Since the era when macular hole was considered untreatable, macular hole surgery has come a long way to being one of the most successful surgeries. Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling has been an essential step of macular hole surgery since the establishment of the role of ILM in the aetiopathogenesis and progression of macular hole. However, the novel technique was not all virtuous. It had some vices which were not evident immediately. With the advent of spectral domain optical coherence tomography, short- and long-term effects of ILM peeling on macular structures were known; and with microperimetry, its effect on the function of macula could be evaluated. The technique has evolved with time from total peeling to inverted flap to just temporal peeling and temporal flap in an attempt to mitigate its adverse effects and to improve its surgical outcome. ILM abrasion technique and Ocriplasmin may eliminate the need of ILM peeling in selected cases, but they have their own limitations. We here discuss the role of ILM in the pathogenesis of macular hole, the benefits and adverse effects of ILM peeling, and the various modifications of the procedure, to then explore the alternatives.Entities:
Keywords: DONFL; Ocriplasmin; adverse effects of ILM peeling; temporal ILM flap; vital dye staining
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35813123 PMCID: PMC9204259 DOI: 10.3205/000309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ger Med Sci ISSN: 1612-3174