Literature DB >> 11530049

Macular changes after peeling of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery.

C Haritoglou1, C A Gass, M Schaumberger, O Ehrt, A Gandorfer, A Kampik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the incidence of macular changes following pars plana vitrectomy with peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) for idiopathic macular hole.
DESIGN: Prospective consecutive series.
METHODS: In a prospective study 105 eyes of 105 patients underwent vitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes. Surgery consisted of a standard three-port vitrectomy, induction of a posterior hyaloid detachment, removal of epiretinal membranes including the ILM, fluid-air exchange and intraocular gas tamponade (15% hexafluoroethane (C2F6) gas mixture) followed by head-down positioning for at least five days. No adjuvants were used during surgery. In addition to the clinical examination, static microperimetry using a Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO-105) was performed pre- and 6 or 12 weeks postoperatively. The stimulus size was 0.2 degrees (Goldmann II), intensities employed were 0 and 12 dB. For all tests, 20-degree fields were used.
RESULTS: Anatomic closure of macular holes was achieved in 92 (87.6%) of 105 patients by one operation. Eight patients underwent a successful second procedure. The closure rate after two operations was 95.2%. Best corrected visual acuity increased from a median of 0.2 (range 0.05 to 0.5) preoperatively to a median of 0.5 (range 0.05 to 1.0) postoperatively. Anatomical macular changes were found in 8 (7.6%) patients: There were two cases of macular edema following secondary cataract extraction and six cases of retinal pigment epithelium changes. Formation of postoperative epiretinal membranes or late reopenings were not noted. Small, mostly asymptomatic paracentral scotomata were seen in 59 (56.2%) of 105 patients.
CONCLUSION: Anatomical changes of the macula following vitrectomy with removal of the ILM are infrequent. However, paracentral scotomata observed in our series might be caused by a trauma to the nerve fibers during ILM peeling. To achieve reliable results a standardized procedure for microperimetry should be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11530049     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01093-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  52 in total

1.  Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  S Ullrich; C Haritoglou; C Gass; M Schaumberger; M W Ulbig; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Sub-retinal hemorrhage during internal limiting membrane peeling for a macular hole.

Authors:  Ko Nakata; Masahito Ohji; Yasushi Ikuno; Shunji Kusaka; Fumi Gomi; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Vision threatening vitreous haemorrhage after internal limiting membrane peeling in macular surgeries.

Authors:  A K H Kwok; D Y L Leung; C Hon; D S C Lam
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Epiretinal pathology of vitreomacular traction syndrome.

Authors:  A Gandorfer; M Rohleder; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  [Surgery for macular edema].

Authors:  C Haritoglou; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Restoration of macular structure as the determining factor for macular hole surgery outcome.

Authors:  José Maria Ruiz-Moreno; Francisco Lugo; Javier A Montero; David P Piñero
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  A new method to predict anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Peipei Liu; Yaoyao Sun; Chongya Dong; Dan Song; Yanrong Jiang; Jianhong Liang; Hong Yin; Xiaoxin Li; Mingwei Zhao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Retinal tolerance to dyes.

Authors:  C Lüke; M Lüke; T S Dietlein; A Hueber; J Jordan; W Sickel; B Kirchhof
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 9.  [Macular hole. Survey and relevant surgical concepts].

Authors:  S Dithmar
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Clinical findings in macular hole surgery with indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane.

Authors:  S Wolf; M B Reichel; P Wiedemann; U E K Schnurrbusch
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.