Literature DB >> 19491726

Reading ability and retinal sensitivity after surgery for macular hole and macular pucker.

Ezio Cappello1, Gianni Virgili, Luigina Tollot, Michele Del Borrello, Ugo Menchini, Marco Zemella.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether reading ability and microperimetry improve as demonstrated for visual acuity after surgery for macular hole and macular pucker.
METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy for macular pucker (n = 41) or full-thickness macular holes (n = 18). Functional assessment was made at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and included far visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts), retinal sensitivity using the microperimeter (MP1, Nidek Technologies, Padova, Italy), and reading ability (MNRead charts).
RESULTS: An improvement was recorded both for macular holes and puckers not only for visual acuity, but also for reading acuity and mean central retinal sensitivity (P < 0.01 for the overall comparisons between baseline and follow-up values). Maximum reading speed was already good at baseline both for puckers and holes overall, and a significant mean improvement was recorded only in patients with macular hole at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.01). Although eyes with macular holes had worse baseline visual function compared with puckers (P < 0.01 for all measures of visual function except for reading speed), they recovered to similar levels thanks to greater improvement (P < 0.05 for the difference in improvement during follow-up between puckers and holes for all measures of visual function). No differences were found among indocyanine green or trypan blue staining compared with no staining for internal limiting membrane removal based on all outcome measures (P > 0.05 for the overall difference of visual function improvement during follow-up).
CONCLUSION: The improvement found for visual acuity after vitrectomy for macular hole and pucker also regards retinal sensitivity and reading ability for up to 12 months. This is reassuring concerning the benefits for the patients, and this shows that visual acuity is a valid functional measure for investigating the efficacy of macular surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19491726     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181a3b832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  17 in total

1.  Macular retinal sensitivity using MP-1 in healthy Malaysian subjects of different ages.

Authors:  Siti Aishah Ismail; Haliza Abdul Mutalib; Nor Fariza Ngah
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-05-27

2.  Long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of idiopathic macular hole surgery. The yield of spectral-domain OCT combined with microperimetry.

Authors:  Arnaud Bonnabel; Alain M Bron; Rodica Isaico; Brice Dugas; Frédéric Nicot; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison between MP-1 and Humphrey visual field defects in glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; R Theodore Smith; Jonathan P Greenberg; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Comparing the Nidek MP-1 and Humphrey field analyzer in normal subjects.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; Nicholas S Bartlett; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.882

6.  [Epiretinal gliosis].

Authors:  C Haritoglou; R G Schumann; A Wolf
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Postoperative metamorphopsia in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: associations with visual function, vision related quality of life, and optical coherence tomography findings.

Authors:  Mathijs A J van de Put; Jelle Vehof; Johanna M M Hooymans; Leonoor I Los
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Current Trends about Inner Limiting Membrane Peeling in Surgery for Epiretinal Membranes.

Authors:  Francesco Semeraro; Francesco Morescalchi; Sarah Duse; Elena Gambicorti; Andrea Russo; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Simulation of thalamic prosthetic vision: reading accuracy, speed, and acuity in sighted humans.

Authors:  Milena Vurro; Anne Marie Crowell; John S Pezaris
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Microperimetric Assessment after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: 4-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Marco Dal Vecchio; Carlo Lavia; Marco Nassisi; Federico M Grignolo; Antonio M Fea
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.