Literature DB >> 11013203

Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling.

H L Brooks1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare results of surgery for idiopathic macular hole with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in a series of consecutive patients over a 5-year period.
DESIGN: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial with concurrent control group. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four eyes with macular holes of less than or equal to 6 months duration without ILM peeling were compared to 116 eyes with ILM peeling and the same hole duration. A third group of 65 eyes with ILM peeling and duration greater than 6 months was also evaluated. INTERVENTION: All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy with or without ILM peeling, intravitreous gas, and positioning face down. No adjunctive therapies were used in any group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparing the closure and/or reopening rate, prognosis, visual acuity, and complications for macular holes with and without ILM peeling.
RESULTS: All patients had postsurgical follow-up of 18 months or greater. Primary closure was significantly improved with ILM peeling with 116 of 116 eyes (100%) showing no reopenings versus 36 of 44 holes (82%) primarily closed, 9 of which (25%) reopened without ILM peeling (P: < 0.00001) in holes less than or equal to 6 months. The 27 eyes without ILM peeling that had successful surgery displayed a mean postoperative vision of 20/40, which is the same as the successful eyes with ILM peeling (P: = 0.6). The 52 stage II eyes with ILM peeling had a mean postoperative vision of 20/30, and 48 of the 52 eyes (92%) were 20/40 or better. Stage III eyes (greater than 400-microm holes) without ILM peeling had a poor prognosis, with 6 of the 25 eyes (24%) having initial surgery fail and an additional 4 of 25 eyes (16%) reopening. Without ILM peeling, holes less than 300 microm had only one reopen, whereas holes greater than or equal to 300 microm had 16 of the 17 (94%) primary failures and/or reopenings (P: < 0.001). All 12 holes that reopened and/or primarily failed were repaired with ILM peeling with excellent visual recovery. Macular holes with a duration greater than 6 months were treated with ILM peeling, and 63 of 65 holes (97%) were closed primarily and 65% had an increase in vision by two or more Snellen lines.
CONCLUSIONS: ILM peeling significantly improves visual and anatomic success in all stages of recent and chronic macular holes and reopened and failed holes, while eliminating reopening for holes greater than 300 microm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11013203     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00331-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  154 in total

1.  Macular configuration determined by optical coherence tomography after idiopathic macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  R Uemoto; S Yamamoto; T Aoki; I Tsukahara; T Yamamoto; S Takeuchi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Macular hole and myopic refraction.

Authors:  H Kobayashi; K Kobayashi; S Okinami
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Sub-retinal hemorrhage during internal limiting membrane peeling for a macular hole.

Authors:  Ko Nakata; Masahito Ohji; Yasushi Ikuno; Shunji Kusaka; Fumi Gomi; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Second generation vital stains in retinal surgery.

Authors:  R B Bhisitkul
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Infracyanine-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole repair: does it make a difference?

Authors:  Kelvin Rivett; Louis Kruger; Sarah Radloff
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Vision threatening vitreous haemorrhage after internal limiting membrane peeling in macular surgeries.

Authors:  A K H Kwok; D Y L Leung; C Hon; D S C Lam
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  [Retinal ICG-accumulation after ILM-staining during macular hole surgery?].

Authors:  I Krömer; A Lommatzsch; D Pauleikhoff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Restoration of macular structure as the determining factor for macular hole surgery outcome.

Authors:  José Maria Ruiz-Moreno; Francisco Lugo; Javier A Montero; David P Piñero
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Comparisons of cone electroretinograms after indocyanine green-, brilliant blue G-, or triamcinolone acetonide-assisted macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Yoshiharu Toba; Tomoharu Nishimura; Takayuki Ohzeki; Ken-ichi Murai; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Does intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane effect the outcome of macular hole surgery?

Authors:  Murat Karacorlu; Hakan Ozdemir; Serra Arf Karacorlu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.