Literature DB >> 8817285

Vitreomacular observations. II. Data on the pathogenesis of idiopathic macular breaks.

A Kakehashi1, C L Schepens, C L Trempe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of idiopathic macular breaks is still uncertain. Their formation has been ascribed to anteriorly oriented intravitreous traction and to shrinkage of the prefoveal cortical vitreous. The validity of both hypotheses is considered in this paper.
METHODS: In order to clarify the pathogenesis of idiopathic macular breaks 127 consecutive patients had their vitreous examined and photographed with the El Bayadi-Kajiura precorneal lens and a slit-lamp microscope.
RESULTS: A comparison with 127 matched controls demonstrated that the vitreous was significantly more often attached in eyes with a macular break than in controls (P < 0.01). In eyes with a macular break the vitreous was significantly more often attached in early cases (Gass stage 1) than in Gass stages 3 and 4 (P < 0.01). Still photographs and observation of the movements of the operculum demonstrated that, in some cases of stage 3 and also in stage 4, it moved inside the partially liquefied posterior vitreous, anteriorly to the retinal surface and frequently without evidence of posterior vitreous detachment over the macular area. The following anatomical features characterize the vitreomacular area: extremely thin hyaloid membrane (< 100 microns) and inner limiting lamina (10 nm) that adhere strongly to each other and to the underlying Mueller cells. There is no evidence that these structures can shrink selectively to cause a macular break. The premacular vitreous gel contains collagen fibers that attach posteriorly to the macula and anteriorly to the vitreous base.
CONCLUSIONS: Our working hypothesis is that when detachment of the posterior vitreous is abnormally delayed, anteroposterior traction by collagen fibers may pull a foveal operculum off the retina. Our observations make this hypothesis attractive. However, the generally accepted hypothesis of Johnson and Gass cannot be entirely dismissed. In reality, since the two hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, they may both the partially correct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817285     DOI: 10.1007/bf02539408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  26 in total

Review 1.  Morphology, pathology, and surgery of idiopathic vitreoretinal macular disorders. A review.

Authors:  W E Smiddy; R G Michels; W R Green
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Age-related differences in the human vitreoretinal interface.

Authors:  J Sebag
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-07

3.  Posterior precortical vitreous pocket.

Authors:  S Kishi; K Shimizu
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-07

4.  Idiopathic macular holes. Observations, stages of formation, and implications for surgical intervention.

Authors:  R N Johnson; J D Gass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Vitreoretinal juncture; topographical variations.

Authors:  R Y Foos
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-10

6.  Biomicroscopic study of the vitreous in macular breaks.

Authors:  M P Avila; A E Jalkh; K Murakami; C L Trempe; C L Schepens
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Biomicroscopic evaluation and photography of posterior vitreous detachment.

Authors:  M Takahashi; C L Trempe; C L Schepens
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-04

8.  Macular holes.

Authors:  M James; S S Feman
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1980

9.  Role of the vitreous in cystoid macular edema.

Authors:  C L Schepens; M P Avila; A E Jalkh; C L Trempe
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 6.048

10.  Idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  C M Morgan; H Schatz
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Macular hole. Survey and relevant surgical concepts].

Authors:  S Dithmar
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Fundus autofluorescence imaging of patients with idiopathic macular hole.

Authors:  Mehmet Yasin Teke; Pinar Cakar-Ozdal; Emine Sen; Ufuk Elgin; Pinar Nalcacıoglu-Yuksekkaya; Faruk Ozturk
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Full-thickness macular holes after surgical repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew R Starr; Crystal Lee; Diego Arias; Raziyeh Mahmoudzadeh; Mirataollah Salabati; Ajay E Kuriyan; Carl D Regillo; Jason Hsu; Yoshihiro Yonekawa; Omesh P Gupta
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Focal vitreomacular traction: a prospective study of the evolution to macular hole: the mathematical approach.

Authors:  G Theodossiadis; P Petrou; M Eleftheriadou; A L Moustakas; I Datseris; P Theodossiadis
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Deepti Pradhan; Lalit Agarwal; Ichhya Joshi; Anamika Kushwaha; Kshitij Aditya; Archana Kumari
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2022-06-02

6.  Clarifying the mechanism of idiopathic macular hole development in fellow eyes using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mikiko Takezawa; Fumihiko Toyoda; Chiho Kambara; Hiroko Yamagami; Akihiro Kakehashi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.