Literature DB >> 26024069

Effect of internal limiting membrane abrasion on retinal tissues in macular holes.

David R P Almeida1, Eric K Chin1, Ryan M Tarantola1, James C Folk1, H Culver Boldt1, Jessica M Skeie2, Robert F Mullins1, Stephen R Russell1, Vinit B Mahajan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the structural and histological effects of a Tano diamond-dusted membrane scraper (DDMS) on the retinal surface after internal limiting membrane (ILM) abrasion in macular hole surgery.
METHODS: Institutional experimental study was performed in 11 eyes. All eyes underwent ILM abrasion in the operating room with a DDMS for macular hole repair as an alternative to traditional ILM peeling. Three human donor eyes underwent an identical procedure in the laboratory. Retinal tissues were removed by ILM abrasion with a DDMS during vitrectomy for macular hole repair and retinal tissues remaining in human donor eyes. Main outcome measures were microscopic and immunohistological characteristics of instrument tip tissues and retinal structure after ILM abrasion.
RESULTS: The tips of the Tano DDMS showed evidence of cellular membranes and ILM removal. The retinas showed distinct areas of lamellar ILM removal without penetration of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL).
CONCLUSIONS: Application of the Tano DDMS instrument is sufficient to remove membranes from the surface of the ILM and layers of the ILM without disruption of the underlying RNFL. Internal limiting membrane abrasion can be a useful and effective alternative to complete ILM removal for macular surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26024069      PMCID: PMC4416746          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-16355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  47 in total

1.  Iatrogenic punctate chorioretinopathy after internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Murat Karacorlu; Serra Karacorlu; Hakan Ozdemir
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  W E Smiddy; W Feuer; G Cordahi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Vitreous cortex remnants at the fovea after spontaneous vitreous detachment.

Authors:  S Kishi; C Demaria; K Shimizu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Arachidonic acid-induced inhibition of Ca2+ channel currents in retinal glial (Müller) cells.

Authors:  A Bringmann; S Schopf; F Faude; A Reichenbach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Macular changes after peeling of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  C Haritoglou; C A Gass; M Schaumberger; O Ehrt; A Gandorfer; A Kampik
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Long-term follow-up of unoperated macular holes.

Authors:  L A Casuso; I U Scott; H W Flynn; J D Gass; W E Smiddy; M L Lewis; J Schiffman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  H L Brooks
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Effect of perifoveal tissue dissection in the management of acute idiopathic full-thickness macular holes.

Authors:  R R Margherio; A R Margherio; G A Williams; D R Chow; M J Banach
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04

9.  Outcome results in macular hole surgery: an evaluation of internal limiting membrane peeling with and without indocyanine green.

Authors:  Tom G Sheidow; Kevin J Blinder; Nancy Holekamp; Daniel Joseph; Gaurav Shah; M Gilbert Grand; Mathew A Thomas; Jeff Bakal; Sanjay Sharma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Up-regulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein in response to retinal injury: its potential role in glial remodeling and a comparison to vimentin expression.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Lewis; Steven K Fisher
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  2003
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Deepti Pradhan; Lalit Agarwal; Ichhya Joshi; Anamika Kushwaha; Kshitij Aditya; Archana Kumari
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Peeled Internal Limiting Membrane Using Focused Ion Beam/Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Akira Hirata; Kazuhisa Murata; Ken Hayashi; Kei-Ichiro Nakamura
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 3.  A Review of Surgical Outcomes and Advances for Macular Holes.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Zhao; Shuang Wang; Nan Liu; Zhi-Min Shu; Jin-Song Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Comparison of Individual Retinal Layer Thicknesses after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery with or without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling.

Authors:  Chul Hee Lee; Min Woo Lee; Eun Young Choi; Suk Ho Byeon; Sung Soo Kim; Hyoung Jun Koh; Sung Chul Lee; Min Kim
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Evaluation of the Morphology of Ganglion Cell Complex and Functional Outcomes after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling with Macular Abrasion in Idiopathic Macular Hole.

Authors:  Aurelio Imburgia; Purva Date; Alessandro Mularoni; Gian Maria Cavallini; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Matteo Forlini
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Spotlight on the Internal Limiting Membrane Technique for Macular Holes: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Tomaso Caporossi; Matteo Mario Carlà; Gloria Gambini; Umberto De Vico; Antonio Baldascino; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 7.  Optimal management of idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Haifa A Madi; Ibrahim Masri; David H Steel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.