Literature DB >> 25764352

Macular Hole Closure With Internal Limiting Membrane Abrasion Technique.

Vinit B Mahajan1, Eric K Chin2, Ryan M Tarantola3, David R P Almeida2, Riz Somani2, H Culver Boldt2, James C Folk2, Karen M Gehrs2, Stephen R Russell2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Internal limiting membrane (ILM) abrasion is an alternative surgical technique for successful full-thickness macular hole (MH) repair.
OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of ILM abrasion as an alternative method of MH repair. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective consecutive case series from January 2006 to December 2008. Demographic data and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative examination records of all patients were reviewed for patients who underwent ILM abrasion with a diamond-dusted membrane scraper during vitrectomy for MH repair. A total of 100 eyes underwent ILM abrasion as an alternative to traditional ILM peeling. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rate of MH closure and visual acuity (VA) outcomes at 3 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Macular hole closure was achieved with a single surgical procedure in 94 of 100 eyes (94.0%; 95% CI, 87.4%-97.8%). Among all patients, the median preoperative VA was 20/100 (range, 20/30 to hand motions; 25th quartile, 20/60; and 75th quartile, 20/160), and the median postoperative VA at 3 months after surgery was 20/60 (range, 20/20 to hand motions; 25th quartile, 20/40; and 75th quartile, 20/100). Among all patients with stage 2 MHs, 30 of 38 patients (78.9%) had at least 2 lines of VA gain: 15 of 23 (65.2%) were phakic, and 15 of 15 (100%) were pseudophakic. Four of 38 patients (10.5%) with stage 2 MHs had at least 2 lines of VA loss, and all were phakic. Among all patients with stage 3 or 4 MHs, 42 of 62 (67.7%) had at least 2 lines of VA gain, of which 30 of 38 (78.9%) were phakic and 22 of 24 (91.7%) were pseudophakic. Six of 62 patients (9.7%) with stage 3 or 4 MHs had at least 2 lines of VA loss: 4 were phakic, and 2 were pseudophakic. In total, 35.0% (95% CI, 25.7%-44.3%) of patients achieved 20/40 vision or better, and 52.0% (95% CI, 42.2%-61.8%) of patients achieved 20/50 vision or better. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Abrasion of the ILM with a diamond-dusted membrane scraper at the time of vitrectomy achieves high rates of MH closure. This technique avoids complete removal of the retinal ILM basement membrane and subjacent tissues and appears to provide MH closure rates similar to those of traditional ILM peeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25764352     DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  12 in total

1.  Effect of internal limiting membrane abrasion on retinal tissues in macular holes.

Authors:  David R P Almeida; Eric K Chin; Ryan M Tarantola; James C Folk; H Culver Boldt; Jessica M Skeie; Robert F Mullins; Stephen R Russell; Vinit B Mahajan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Crescent-Shaped Retinal Defects Associated With Membrane Peeling With a Diamond-Dusted Membrane Scraper.

Authors:  Ella H Leung; Harry W Flynn; Philip J Rosenfeld
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.300

3.  Tailored internal limiting membrane flap technique for primary macular hole.

Authors:  Jia-Horung Hung; Yu-Harn Horng; Hui-Chen Chu; Meng-Syuan Li; Shwu-Jiuan Sheu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) versus perfluoropropane (C3F8) tamponade and short term face-down position for macular hole repair: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Giamberto Casini; Pasquale Loiudice; Stefano De Cillà; Paolo Radice; Marco Nardi
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Peeled Internal Limiting Membrane Using Focused Ion Beam/Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Akira Hirata; Kazuhisa Murata; Ken Hayashi; Kei-Ichiro Nakamura
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 6.  A Review of Surgical Outcomes and Advances for Macular Holes.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Zhao; Shuang Wang; Nan Liu; Zhi-Min Shu; Jin-Song Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 7.  Pathogenesis and Management of Macular Hole: Review of Current Advances.

Authors:  Guzel Bikbova; Toshiyuki Oshitari; Takayuki Baba; Shuichi Yamamoto; Keisuke Mori
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Ultrastructural study of closed macular hole- preliminary application of a novel high magnification module combining with OCT.

Authors:  Chang-Yu Qiu; Yuan-Yuan Shi; Hong-Wei Zhao; Chuang Nie; Ming-Xia Dong; Huai-Qiang Zhang; Jun Zhao; Qian-Qian Xu; Fei-Long Song; Xiao-Hua Guo; Lin Shi; Chang-Ying Liu; Yu-Bo Gong; Ling Luo
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Evaluation of the Morphology of Ganglion Cell Complex and Functional Outcomes after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling with Macular Abrasion in Idiopathic Macular Hole.

Authors:  Aurelio Imburgia; Purva Date; Alessandro Mularoni; Gian Maria Cavallini; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Matteo Forlini
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 10.  Spotlight on the Internal Limiting Membrane Technique for Macular Holes: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Tomaso Caporossi; Matteo Mario Carlà; Gloria Gambini; Umberto De Vico; Antonio Baldascino; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.