| Literature DB >> 35743947 |
Vesselin V Doytchinov1, Svetoslav G Dimov1.
Abstract
Antarctica represents a unique environment, both due to the extreme meteorological and geological conditions that govern it and the relative isolation from human influences that have kept its environment largely undisturbed. However, recent trends in climate change dictate an unavoidable change in the global biodiversity as a whole, and pristine environments, such as Antarctica, allow us to study and monitor more closely the effects of the human impact. Additionally, due to its inaccessibility, Antarctica contains a plethora of yet uncultured and unidentified microorganisms with great potential for useful biological activities and production of metabolites, such as novel antibiotics, proteins, pigments, etc. In recent years, amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) has allowed for a fast and thorough examination of microbial communities to accelerate the efforts of unknown species identification. For these reasons, in this review, we present an overview of the archaea, bacteria, and fungi present on the Antarctic continent and the surrounding area (maritime Antarctica, sub-Antarctica, Southern Sea, etc.) that have recently been identified using amplicon-based NGS methods.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctica; archaea; bacteria; environmental genetics; fungi; high-throughput sequencing (HTS); metagenomics; microbiology; next-generation sequencing (NGS)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35743947 PMCID: PMC9228076 DOI: 10.3390/life12060916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Comparison between amplicon and shotgun sequencing.
| Amplicon Sequencing | Shotgun Sequencing | |
|---|---|---|
| Advantages | – Can work with small sample volumes | – Very high resolution (up to SNPs) |
| – Results are focused on a single kingdom | – Results for all DNA in the sample | |
| – Cheap | ||
| Disadvantages | – Smaller taxonomic resolution | – Requires larger sample volumes |
| – Results restricted to a single kingdom | – Results for a single kingdom are harder to distinguish | |
| – Variations in the number of amplicons as a result of PCR amplification or simply the nature of the organism | – Expensive for the time being |
Figure 1Gene layout of the two commonly used reporter molecules in NGS and some of the typical primers employed in their sequencing. (a) The 16S rRNA gene, used for sequencing of bacterial and archaeal communities. The variable regions allow for the delineation between OTUs, while the conservative regions are used as universal primer binding sites. (b) The ITS regions flanking the 5.8S rRNA gene used for annotating eukaryotes.
Figure 2Ecological niches occupied by the different microbial communities in Antarctica. 1—Soil and rock communities; 2—Inland and glacial water communities; 3—Meltwater ponds communities; 4—Subglacial water communities; 5—Marine water communities; 6—Microbial mats and sediments communities; 7—Cryoconite hole, glacial ice, and snow communities; 8—Airborne microorganisms.