Literature DB >> 22170424

The Inter-Valley Soil Comparative Survey: the ecology of Dry Valley edaphic microbial communities.

Charles K Lee1, Béatrice A Barbier, Eric M Bottos, Ian R McDonald, Stephen Craig Cary.   

Abstract

Recent applications of molecular genetics to edaphic microbial communities of the McMurdo Dry Valleys and elsewhere have rejected a long-held belief that Antarctic soils contain extremely limited microbial diversity. The Inter-Valley Soil Comparative Survey aims to elucidate the factors shaping these unique microbial communities and their biogeography by integrating molecular genetic approaches with biogeochemical analyses. Although the microbial communities of Dry Valley soils may be complex, there is little doubt that the ecosystem's food web is relatively simple, and evidence suggests that physicochemical conditions may have the dominant role in shaping microbial communities. To examine this hypothesis, bacterial communities from representative soil samples collected in four geographically disparate Dry Valleys were analyzed using molecular genetic tools, including pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene PCR amplicons. Results show that the four communities are structurally and phylogenetically distinct, and possess significantly different levels of diversity. Strikingly, only 2 of 214 phylotypes were found in all four valleys, challenging a widespread assumption that the microbiota of the Dry Valleys is composed of a few cosmopolitan species. Analysis of soil geochemical properties indicated that salt content, alongside altitude and Cu(2+), was significantly correlated with differences in microbial communities. Our results indicate that the microbial ecology of Dry Valley soils is highly localized and that physicochemical factors potentially have major roles in shaping the microbiology of ice-free areas of Antarctica. These findings hint at links between Dry Valley glacial geomorphology and microbial ecology, and raise previously unrecognized issues related to environmental management of this unique ecosystem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22170424      PMCID: PMC3329106          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  38 in total

1.  Antarctic climate cooling and terrestrial ecosystem response.

Authors:  Peter T Doran; John C Priscu; W Berry Lyons; John E Walsh; Andrew G Fountain; Diane M McKnight; Daryl L Moorhead; Ross A Virginia; Diana H Wall; Gary D Clow; Christian H Fritsen; Christopher P McKay; Andrew N Parsons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Forest floor bacterial community composition and catabolic profiles in relation to landscape features in Québec's southern boreal forest.

Authors:  Josyanne Lamarche; Robert L Bradley; Elaine Hooper; Bill Shipley; Anne-Marie Simao Beaunoir; Carole Beaulieu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Widespread distribution and identification of eight novel microcystins in antarctic cyanobacterial mats.

Authors:  Susanna A Wood; Doug Mountfort; Andrew I Selwood; Patrick T Holland; Jonathan Puddick; S Craig Cary
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data.

Authors:  Christopher Quince; Anders Lanzén; Thomas P Curtis; Russell J Davenport; Neil Hall; Ian M Head; L Fiona Read; William T Sloan
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 6.  Controls on the distribution of productivity and organic resources in Antarctic Dry Valley soils.

Authors:  D W Hopkins; A D Sparrow; P M Novis; E G Gregorich; B Elberling; L G Greenfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering.

Authors:  Susan M Huse; David Mark Welch; Hilary G Morrison; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.491

8.  Highly specialized microbial diversity in hyper-arid polar desert.

Authors:  Stephen B Pointing; Yuki Chan; Donnabella C Lacap; Maggie C Y Lau; Joel A Jurgens; Roberta L Farrell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons.

Authors:  Christopher Quince; Anders Lanzen; Russell J Davenport; Peter J Turnbaugh
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  NAST: a multiple sequence alignment server for comparative analysis of 16S rRNA genes.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; K Keller; E L Brodie; N Larsen; Y M Piceno; R Phan; G L Andersen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  74 in total

1.  Evidence for successional development in Antarctic hypolithic bacterial communities.

Authors:  Thulani P Makhalanyane; Angel Valverde; Nils-Kåre Birkeland; Stephen C Cary; I Marla Tuffin; Don A Cowan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Spatial pattern in Antarctica: what can we learn from Antarctic bacterial isolates?

Authors:  Chun Wie Chong; Yuh Shan Goh; Peter Convey; David Pearce; Irene Kit Ping Tan
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly.

Authors:  Diana R Nemergut; Steven K Schmidt; Tadashi Fukami; Sean P O'Neill; Teresa M Bilinski; Lee F Stanish; Joseph E Knelman; John L Darcy; Ryan C Lynch; Phillip Wickey; Scott Ferrenberg
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Continental-scale distributions of dust-associated bacteria and fungi.

Authors:  Albert Barberán; Joshua Ladau; Jonathan W Leff; Katherine S Pollard; Holly L Menninger; Robert R Dunn; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The changing form of Antarctic biodiversity.

Authors:  Steven L Chown; Andrew Clarke; Ceridwen I Fraser; S Craig Cary; Katherine L Moon; Melodie A McGeoch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Jonathan W Leff; Byron J Adams; Uffe N Nielsen; Scott Thomas Bates; Christian L Lauber; Sarah Owens; Jack A Gilbert; Diana H Wall; J Gregory Caporaso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Soil microbial responses to increased moisture and organic resources along a salinity gradient in a polar desert.

Authors:  David J Van Horn; Jordan G Okie; Heather N Buelow; Michael N Gooseff; John E Barrett; Cristina D Takacs-Vesbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Patterns of bacterial biodiversity in the glacial meltwater streams of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica.

Authors:  David J Van Horn; Caitlin R Wolf; Daniel R Colman; Xiaoben Jiang; Tyler J Kohler; Diane M McKnight; Lee F Stanish; Terrill Yazzie; Cristina D Takacs-Vesbach
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.194

9.  Atmospheric trace gases support primary production in Antarctic desert surface soil.

Authors:  Mukan Ji; Chris Greening; Inka Vanwonterghem; Carlo R Carere; Sean K Bay; Jason A Steen; Kate Montgomery; Thomas Lines; John Beardall; Josie van Dorst; Ian Snape; Matthew B Stott; Philip Hugenholtz; Belinda C Ferrari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Functional ecology of an Antarctic Dry Valley.

Authors:  Yuki Chan; Joy D Van Nostrand; Jizhong Zhou; Stephen B Pointing; Roberta L Farrell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.