| Literature DB >> 35741051 |
Tatiana V Nikitina1, Igor N Lebedev1.
Abstract
Miscarriage affects approximately 15% of clinically recognized pregnancies, and 1-3% of couples experience pregnancy loss recurrently. Approximately 50-60% of miscarriages result from chromosomal abnormalities, whereas up to 60% of euploid recurrent abortions harbor variants in candidate genes. The growing number of detected genetic variants requires an investigation into their role in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Since placental defects are the main cause of first-trimester miscarriages, the purpose of this review is to provide a survey of state-of-the-art human in vitro trophoblast models that can be used for the functional assessment of specific abnormalities/variants implicated in pregnancy loss. Since 2018, when primary human trophoblast stem cells were first derived, there has been rapid growth in models of trophoblast lineage. It has been found that a proper balance between self-renewal and differentiation in trophoblast progenitors is crucial for the maintenance of pregnancy. Different responses to aneuploidy have been shown in human embryonic and extra-embryonic lineages. Stem cell-based models provide a powerful tool to explore the effect of a specific aneuploidy/variant on the fetus through placental development, which is important, from a clinical point of view, for deciding on the suitability of embryos for transfer after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.Entities:
Keywords: aneuploidy; extended blastocyst culture; miscarriage; mosaicism; recurrent pregnancy loss; trophoblast; trophoblast organoid; trophoblast stem cells
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741051 PMCID: PMC9221414 DOI: 10.3390/cells11121923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Figure 1Stem cell-based technologies for the study of human trophoblasts and placental development. Genetic factors affect proper human embryo development and pregnancy success. Many processes in early development are hidden in the “black box” of human implantation [1]. Stem cell-based technologies can be applied to study gene functions or manifestations of chromosomal abnormalities in human trophoblast lineage. This opens up the possibility of an experimental study of the processes of early placental development and the underlying molecular mechanisms of the pathogenesis of pregnancy complications, among which miscarriage is the most common.
Advantages and limitations of stem cell-based trophoblast models.
| Stem Cell-Based Model | Cell Source | Advantages | Limitations | Key Achievements of Model Application for Genetics of Miscarriage or Trophoblast Dysfunction Pathology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMP4-induced trophoblast-like cells | ESCs [ | Availability of source material; | Lacking self-renewal; | Trisomy 21: delay in the induction of the trophoblast lineage, lower fusion index, increased hCG secretion [ |
| Monosomy X: altered levels of placental genes; skewed trophoblast cell type composition [ | ||||
| Translocation (11;22): impaired expression of trophoblastic genes; lower invasiveness [ | ||||
| Preeclampsia: reduced trophoblast invasion under high O2 conditions [ | ||||
| Recurrent complete hydatidiform mole: precocious downregulation of pluripotency factors and activation of trophoblast lineage markers [ | ||||
| Lineage-specific behavior of aneuploid cells in “gastruloids” with prevalent survival of extra-embryonic tissue [ | ||||
| “True” human trophoblast stem cells (hTSCs) | Blastocysts; | Patient-specific; preserved characteristics of trophoblastic cells, unlimited self-renewing capacity | Derivation from the primary tissues of some abortions may be problematic | Association of idiopathic RPL with altered expression of TEAD4; imbalance of self-renewal vs. differentiation in idiopathic RPL placentae [ |
| Complete hydatidiform mole exhibits resistance to contact inhibition [ | ||||
| Neddylation inhibition hindered EVT differentiation [ | ||||
| Depletion of MSX2 resulted in precocious STB differentiation [ | ||||
| Decreased CKMT11 expression associated with PE [ | ||||
| Trophoblast stem-like cells (TSLCs) | Naïve PSCs [ | Availability of source material; | Possible inconsistencies of epigenetic specificity | No data currently available |
| Induced trophoblast stem cells (iTSCs) | Somatic cells | |||
| 3D culture models | 1st trimester CTBs [ | More authentic tissue environments; self-renewing ability | Limited self-renewal in some studies | Treatment with YAP/TAZ inhibitor reduced organoid growth and expression of cyclin A [ |
| hTSCs [ | Inefficient organoid formation for RPL cases with reduced expression of TEAD4 [ | |||
| Transcriptomic landscape for CTB commitment to EVT or SCT; BCAM is a primitive progenitor marker [ | ||||
| Naïve PSCs [ | Dynamics of X chromosome inactivation [ | |||
| Blastoids | Naïve PSCs | A large number of units in one experiment; | Expression discrepancy with blastocysts in some models | No data currently available |
| hEPSCs | ||||
| iBlastoids | Fibroblasts | |||
| Extended blastocyst culture | Blastocysts | Patient-specific; preserved native characteristics of cells; autonomy from maternal contribution | Limited access to source | Lethality of autosomal monosomies and multiple aberrations at the peri-implantation period; embryos with duplications develop longer than with deletions [ |
| 3D extended blastocyst culture | Blastocysts |