Literature DB >> 27692437

Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing.

Susan M Maxwell1, Pere Colls2, Brooke Hodes-Wertz3, David H McCulloh3, Caroline McCaffrey3, Dagan Wells4, Santiago Munné2, James A Grifo3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether undetected aneuploidy contributes to pregnancy loss after transfer of euploid embryos that have undergone array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: University-based fertility center. PATIENT(S): Cases included 38 patients who underwent frozen euploid ET as determined by aCGH, resulting in miscarriage. Controls included 38 patients who underwent frozen euploid ET as determined by aCGH, resulting in a live birth. INTERVENTION(S): Next-generation sequencing (NGS) protocols were internally validated. Saved amplified DNA samples from the blastocyst trophectoderm biopsies previously diagnosed as euploid by aCGH were reanalyzed using NGS. Cytogenetic reports of the products of conception for 20 of the pregnancies resulting in miscarriage were available for comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism using NGS within embryos resulting in miscarriage and live birth. RESULT(S): Of euploid embryos analyzed by aCGH resulting in miscarriage, 31.6% were mosaic and 5.2% were polyploid by NGS. The rate of chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher in embryos resulting in miscarriage (36.8%) than in those resulting in live births (15.8%). The rate of mosaicism was twice as high among embryos resulting in miscarriage than those resulting in live birth, but this was not statistically significant. Next-generation sequencing detected more cases of mosaicism than cytogenetic analysis of products of conception. CONCLUSION(S): Undetected aneuploidy may increase the risk of first trimester pregnancy loss. Next-generation sequencing may detect mosaicism and triploidy more frequently than aCGH, which could help to identify embryos at high risk of miscarriage. Mosaic embryos, however, should not be discarded as some can result in live births. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Preimplantation genetic screening; array comparative genomic hybridization; mosaicism; next-generation sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27692437     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  36 in total

1.  Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Berhan Bogale; Yaqiong Tang; Sijia Lu; Xiaoliang Sunney Xie; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The cost of a euploid embryo identified from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a counseling tool.

Authors:  Randi H Goldman; Catherine Racowsky; Leslie V Farland; Janis H Fox; Santiago Munné; Lia Ribustello; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  The mechanisms and clinical application of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Xinyuan Li; Yan Hao; Nagwa Elshewy; Xiaoqian Zhu; Zhiguo Zhang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Healthy live births from transfer of low-mosaicism embryos after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Chun-I Lee; En-Hui Cheng; Maw-Sheng Lee; Pin-Yao Lin; Yi-Chun Chen; Chien-Hong Chen; Lii-Shung Huang; Chun-Chia Huang; Tsung-Hsien Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Single best euploid versus single best unknown-ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Gonul Didem Akay Yoruk; Nevrah Nal Candurmaz; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Mosaicism in Preimplantation Human Embryos: When Chromosomal Abnormalities Are the Norm.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid-aneuploid blastocysts.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Samer Alfarawati; Katharina Spath; Dhruti Babariya; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Andrea Borini; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  To mask or not to mask mosaicism? The impact of reporting embryo mosaicism on reproductive potential.

Authors:  A Armstrong; J Miller; M Quinn; A V Nguyen; L Kwan; L Kroener
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.357

9.  Evidence-based clinical prioritization of embryos with mosaic results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Mourad; Roland Antaki; François Bissonnette; Obey Al Baini; Boutros Saadeh; Wael Jamal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Diagnostic efficiency of blastocyst culture medium in noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Jingbo Chen; Lei Jia; Tingting Li; Yingchun Guo; Shujing He; Zhiqiang Zhang; Wenlong Su; Shihui Zhang; Cong Fang
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.