Literature DB >> 31686035

In vitro fertilization does not increase the incidence of de novo copy number alterations in fetal and placental lineages.

Masoud Zamani Esteki1,2,3, Triin Viltrop4, Olga Tšuiko5,4, Airi Tiirats6, Mariann Koel7, Margit Nõukas8,9, Olga Žilina8, Katre Teearu8, Heidi Marjonen10, Hanna Kahila11, Jeroen Meekels12, Viveca Söderström-Anttila13, Anne-Maria Suikkari13, Aila Tiitinen11, Reedik Mägi9, Sulev Kõks14,15, Nina Kaminen-Ahola10, Ants Kurg8, Thierry Voet16,17, Joris Robert Vermeesch18, Andres Salumets19,20,21,22.   

Abstract

Although chromosomal instability (CIN) is a common phenomenon in cleavage-stage embryogenesis following in vitro fertilization (IVF)1-3, its rate in naturally conceived human embryos is unknown. CIN leads to mosaic embryos that contain a combination of genetically normal and abnormal cells, and is significantly higher in in vitro-produced preimplantation embryos as compared to in vivo-conceived preimplantation embryos4. Even though embryos with CIN-derived complex aneuploidies may arrest between the cleavage and blastocyst stages of embryogenesis5,6, a high number of embryos containing abnormal cells can pass this strong selection barrier7,8. However, neither the prevalence nor extent of CIN during prenatal development and at birth, following IVF treatment, is well understood. Here we profiled the genomic landscape of fetal and placental tissues postpartum from both IVF and naturally conceived children, to investigate the prevalence and persistence of large genetic aberrations that probably arose from IVF-related CIN. We demonstrate that CIN is not preserved at later stages of prenatal development, and that de novo numerical aberrations or large structural DNA imbalances occur at similar rates in IVF and naturally conceived live-born neonates. Our findings affirm that human IVF treatment has no detrimental effect on the chromosomal constitution of fetal and placental lineages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31686035     DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0620-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


  43 in total

1.  Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cédric Le Caignec; Michèle Ampe; Peter Konings; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Mustapha Amyere; Miikka Vikkula; Frans Schuit; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Geert Verbeke; Thomas D'Hooghe; Yves Moreau; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate challenge of preimplantation genetic testing?

Authors:  M Popovic; A Dheedene; C Christodoulou; J Taelman; L Dhaenens; F Van Nieuwerburgh; D Deforce; E Van den Abbeel; P De Sutter; B Menten; B Heindryckx
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jannie van Echten-Arends; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Johanna C Korevaar; Maas Jan Heineman; Fulco van der Veen; Sjoerd Repping
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Concurrent whole-genome haplotyping and copy-number profiling of single cells.

Authors:  Masoud Zamani Esteki; Eftychia Dimitriadou; Ligia Mateiu; Cindy Melotte; Niels Van der Aa; Parveen Kumar; Rakhi Das; Koen Theunis; Jiqiu Cheng; Eric Legius; Yves Moreau; Sophie Debrock; Thomas D'Hooghe; Pieter Verdyck; Martine De Rycke; Karen Sermon; Joris R Vermeesch; Thierry Voet
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Common variants spanning PLK4 are associated with mitotic-origin aneuploidy in human embryos.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy; Zachary Demko; Allison Ryan; Milena Banjevic; Matthew Hill; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Matthew Rabinowitz; Hunter B Fraser; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Genome stability of bovine in vivo-conceived cleavage-stage embryos is higher compared to in vitro-produced embryos.

Authors:  Olga Tšuiko; Maaike Catteeuw; Masoud Zamani Esteki; Aspasia Destouni; Osvaldo Bogado Pascottini; Urban Besenfelder; Vitezslav Havlicek; Katrien Smits; Ants Kurg; Andres Salumets; Thomas D'Hooghe; Thierry Voet; Ann Van Soom; Joris Robert Vermeesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Samer Alfarawati; Danny D Daphnis; N-Neka Goodall; Anastasia Mania; Tracey Griffiths; Anthony Gordon; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Karen Sermon; Catherine Staessen; Inge Liebaers; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Thomas D'Hooghe; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage.

Authors:  Shawn L Chavez; Kevin E Loewke; Jinnuo Han; Farshid Moussavi; Pere Colls; Santiago Munne; Barry Behr; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Evidence of Selection against Complex Mitotic-Origin Aneuploidy during Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy; Zachary P Demko; Allison Ryan; Milena Banjevic; Matthew Hill; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Matthew Rabinowitz; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  14 in total

1.  Depletion of aneuploid cells in human embryos and gastruloids.

Authors:  Min Yang; Tiago Rito; Jakob Metzger; Jeffrey Naftaly; Rohan Soman; Jianjun Hu; David F Albertini; David H Barad; Ali H Brivanlou; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 2.  On the reproductive capabilities of aneuploid human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Maurizio Poli; Chaim Jalas; Eric J Forman; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 11.043

3.  Metabolic and epigenetic dysfunctions underlie the arrest of in vitro fertilized human embryos in a senescent-like state.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Liyang Shi; Xiuling Fu; Gang Ma; Zhongzhou Yang; Yuhao Li; Yibin Zhou; Lihua Yuan; Ye Xia; Xiufang Zhong; Ping Yin; Li Sun; Wuwen Zhang; Isaac A Babarinde; Yongjun Wang; Xiaoyang Zhao; Andrew P Hutchins; Guoqing Tong
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 9.593

Review 4.  Stem Cell-Based Trophoblast Models to Unravel the Genetic Causes of Human Miscarriages.

Authors:  Tatiana V Nikitina; Igor N Lebedev
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 5.  Emerging mechanisms of cell competition.

Authors:  Nicholas E Baker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Confined placental mosaicism involving multiple de novo copy number variants associated with fetal growth restriction: A case report.

Authors:  Giulia F Del Gobbo; Victor Yuan; Wendy P Robinson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Mosaic human preimplantation embryos and their developmental potential in a prospective, non-selection clinical trial.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Maurizio Poli; Laura Rienzi; Laura Girardi; Cristina Patassini; Marco Fabiani; Danilo Cimadomo; Francesca Benini; Alessio Farcomeni; Juliana Cuzzi; Carmen Rubio; Elena Albani; Laura Sacchi; Alberto Vaiarelli; Matteo Figliuzzi; Necati Findikli; Onder Coban; Fazilet K Boynukalin; Ivan Vogel; Eva Hoffmann; Claudia Livi; Paolo E Levi-Setti; Filippo M Ubaldi; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  De novo mutations in children born after medical assisted reproduction.

Authors:  R M Smits; M J Xavier; M S Oud; G D N Astuti; A M Meijerink; P F de Vries; G S Holt; B K S Alobaidi; L E Batty; G Khazeeva; K Sablauskas; L E L M Vissers; C Gilissen; K Fleischer; D D M Braat; L Ramos; J A Veltman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.353

Review 9.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements.

Authors:  Manuel Viotti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Single-cell analysis of human embryos reveals diverse patterns of aneuploidy and mosaicism.

Authors:  Margaret R Starostik; Olukayode A Sosina; Rajiv C McCoy
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.