Literature DB >> 28390692

Detection of mosaicism at blastocyst stage with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing.

Santiago Munné1, Dagan Wells2.   

Abstract

A significant proportion of human preimplantation embryos produced during the course of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments contain two or more cytogenetically distinct cell lines. This phenomenon, known as chromosomal mosaicism, can involve the presence of cells with different types of aneuploidy in the absence of any normal cells or a mixture of euploid and abnormal cells. Although a high prevalence of mosaicism at the cleavage and blastocyst stages has been appreciated for two decades, the precise frequency of the phenomenon and its consequences for embryo viability have been difficult to quantify. Recent advances in genetic technologies, such as high-resolution next-generation sequencing, have allowed mosaicism to be detected with much greater sensitivity than earlier methods. The application of these techniques to trophectoderm biopsies, taken from embryos before transfer to the uterus, has provided insight into the clinical impact of mosaicism. Data from recent studies show that blastocysts associated with mosaic trophectoderm biopsy specimens implant less often than embryos with a chromosomally normal biopsy. In addition, the mosaic embryos that succeed in establishing a pregnancy are at a significantly higher risk of miscarriage. Because mosaic embryos are less likely to produce a viable pregnancy than their euploid counterparts, we suggest that they are given a lower priority for transfer to the uterus. However, because these embryos can sometimes produce successful pregnancies, it is important that they can be considered for transfer in the absence of fully euploid embryos and after appropriate patient counseling. Unlike aneuploidy of meiotic origin, mosaicism, which is caused by mitotic errors occurring after fertilization, does not increase with advancing maternal age. There may, however, be clinical, treatment, or patient-related factors that contribute to the risk of mosaicism occurring. This review discusses the validation of methods that permit the detection of chromosomal mosaicism in IVF embryos and findings of clinical relevance.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mosaic; aneuploidy; blastocyst; preimplantation genetic screening; preimplantation genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28390692     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  37 in total

1.  Mathematical modeling of human oocyte aneuploidy.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Tyc; Rajiv C McCoy; Karen Schindler; Jinchuan Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mosaic embryo transfer after oocyte in vitro maturation in combination with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)-first report of a euploid live birth.

Authors:  Naomi Inoue; Rosmary Lopez; Andrea Delgado; Denisse Nuñez; Jimmy Portella; Luis Noriega-Hoces; Luis Guzmán
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  On strong inferences and irreproducibility in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Essential learning tools for continuing medical education for physicians, geneticists, nurses, allied health professionals, mental health professionals, business administration professionals, and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellows: the Midwest Reproductive Symposium International.

Authors:  Gretchen G Collins; Roohi Jeelani; Angeline Beltsos; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The reproducibility of trophectoderm biopsies in euploid, aneuploid, and mosaic embryos using independently verified next-generation sequencing (NGS): a pilot study.

Authors:  Nidhee M Sachdev; David H McCulloh; Yael Kramer; David Keefe; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Male factor infertility impacts the rate of mosaic blastocysts in cycles of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marco Nadalini; Cristina Lagalla; Giovanni Coticchio; Carlotta Zacà; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Healthy live births from transfer of low-mosaicism embryos after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Chun-I Lee; En-Hui Cheng; Maw-Sheng Lee; Pin-Yao Lin; Yi-Chun Chen; Chien-Hong Chen; Lii-Shung Huang; Chun-Chia Huang; Tsung-Hsien Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Single best euploid versus single best unknown-ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Gonul Didem Akay Yoruk; Nevrah Nal Candurmaz; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  mtDNA dynamics between cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts.

Authors:  Neelke De Munck; Alberto Liñán; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Carmen Rubio; Nicolas Garrido; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Authors:  Katherine L Palmerola; Sally F Vitez; Selma Amrane; Catha P Fischer; Eric J Forman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.