Literature DB >> 33564150

Outcome of publicly funded nationwide first-tier noninvasive prenatal screening.

Kris Van Den Bogaert1, Lore Lannoo2, Nathalie Brison1, Vincent Gatinois1, Machteld Baetens3, Bettina Blaumeiser4,5, François Boemer6, Laura Bourlard7, Vincent Bours6, Anne De Leener8, Marjan De Rademaeker5, Julie Désir7,9, Annelies Dheedene3, Armelle Duquenne8, Nathalie Fieremans10, Annelies Fieuw10, Jean-Stéphane Gatot6, Bernard Grisart9, Katrien Janssens4, Sandra Janssens3, Damien Lederer9, Axel Marichal9, Björn Menten3, Colombine Meunier9, Leonor Palmeira6, Bruno Pichon7, Eva Sammels10, Guillaume Smits7, Yves Sznajer8, Elise Vantroys10, Koenraad Devriendt1, Joris Robert Vermeesch11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA has transformed prenatal care. Belgium was the first country to implement and fully reimburse NIPS as a first-tier screening test offered to all pregnant women. A consortium consisting of all Belgian genetic centers report the outcome of two years genome-wide NIPS implementation.
METHODS: The performance for the common trisomies and for secondary findings was evaluated based on 153,575 genome-wide NIP tests. Furthermore, the evolution of the number of invasive tests and the incidence of Down syndrome live births was registered.
RESULTS: Trisomies 21, 18, and 13 were detected in respectively 0.32%, 0.07%, and 0.06% of cases, with overall positive predictive values (PPVs) of 92.4%, 84.6%, and 43.9%. Rare autosomal trisomies and fetal segmental imbalances were detected in respectively 0.23% and 0.07% of cases with PPVs of 4.1% and 47%. The number of invasive obstetric procedures decreased by 52%. The number of trisomy 21 live births dropped to 0.04%.
CONCLUSION: Expanding the scope of NIPS beyond trisomy 21 fetal screening allows the implementation of personalized genomic medicine for the obstetric population. This genome-wide NIPS approach has been embedded successfully in prenatal genetic care in Belgium and might serve as a framework for other countries offering NIPS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33564150     DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01101-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  1 in total

Review 1.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10
  1 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Stem Cell-Based Trophoblast Models to Unravel the Genetic Causes of Human Miscarriages.

Authors:  Tatiana V Nikitina; Igor N Lebedev
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 7.666

2.  Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study.

Authors:  Lisanne van Prooyen Schuurman; Erik A Sistermans; Diane Van Opstal; Lidewij Henneman; Mireille N Bekker; Caroline J Bax; Mijntje J Pieters; Katelijne Bouman; Sonja de Munnik; Nicolette S den Hollander; Karin E M Diderich; Brigitte H W Faas; Ilse Feenstra; Attie T J I Go; Mariëtte J V Hoffer; Marieke Joosten; Fenne L Komdeur; Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Maria P Lombardi; Marike G Polak; Fernanda S Jehee; Heleen Schuring-Blom; Servi J C Stevens; Malgorzata I Srebniak; Ron F Suijkerbuijk; Gita M Tan-Sindhunata; Karuna R M van der Meij; Merel C van Maarle; Vivian Vernimmen; Shama L van Zelderen-Bhola; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Maarten F C M Knapen; Merryn V E Macville; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 11.043

3.  What is so complicated about prenatal testing for Down syndrome? A personal view.

Authors:  Louise Bryant
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.881

4.  Comprehensive genome-wide analysis of routine non-invasive test data allows cancer prediction: A single-center retrospective analysis of over 85,000 pregnancies.

Authors:  Liesbeth Lenaerts; Nathalie Brison; Charlotte Maggen; Leen Vancoillie; Huiwen Che; Peter Vandenberghe; Daan Dierickx; Lucienne Michaux; Barbara Dewaele; Patrick Neven; Giuseppe Floris; Thomas Tousseyn; Lore Lannoo; Tatjana Jatsenko; Isabelle Vanden Bempt; Kristel Van Calsteren; Vincent Vandecaveye; Luc Dehaspe; Koenraad Devriendt; Eric Legius; Kris Van Den Bogaert; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-05-13

5.  Mosaic human preimplantation embryos and their developmental potential in a prospective, non-selection clinical trial.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Maurizio Poli; Laura Rienzi; Laura Girardi; Cristina Patassini; Marco Fabiani; Danilo Cimadomo; Francesca Benini; Alessio Farcomeni; Juliana Cuzzi; Carmen Rubio; Elena Albani; Laura Sacchi; Alberto Vaiarelli; Matteo Figliuzzi; Necati Findikli; Onder Coban; Fazilet K Boynukalin; Ivan Vogel; Eva Hoffmann; Claudia Livi; Paolo E Levi-Setti; Filippo M Ubaldi; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Novel Early Pregnancy Multimarker Screening Test for Preeclampsia Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Kaspar Ratnik; Kristiina Rull; Oliver Aasmets; Triin Kikas; Ele Hanson; Kalle Kisand; Krista Fischer; Maris Laan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-27

7.  A Critical Evaluation of Validation and Clinical Experience Studies in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and Monosomy X.

Authors:  Zachary Demko; Brittany Prigmore; Peter Benn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Initial Clinical Experience with NIPT for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies and Large Copy Number Variations.

Authors:  Thomas Harasim; Teresa Neuhann; Anne Behnecke; Miriam Stampfer; Elke Holinski-Feder; Angela Abicht
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  The ethical landscape(s) of non-invasive prenatal testing in England, France and Germany: findings from a comparative literature review.

Authors:  Adeline Perrot; Ruth Horn
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 5.351

10.  Does non-invasive prenatal testing affect the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Netherlands? A population-based register study.

Authors:  Maurike de Groot-van der Mooren; Gert de Graaf; Michel E Weijerman; Mariette J V Hoffer; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Anne-Marie M F van der Kevie-Kersemaekers; Angelique J A Kooper; Els Voorhoeve; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Laura J C M van Zutven; Malgorzata Ilona Srebniak; Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam; John J M Engelen; Dominique Smeets; Anton H van Kaam; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.