Literature DB >> 31236830

Worldwide live births following the transfer of chromosomally "Abnormal" embryos after PGT/A: results of a worldwide web-based survey.

Pasquale Patrizio1, Gon Shoham2, Zeev Shoham3,4, Milton Leong5, David H Barad6,7, Norbert Gleicher6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has become increasingly controversial since normal euploid births have been reported following transfer of embryos diagnosed as "abnormal." There is an increasing trend in transferring "abnormal" embryos; but it is still unknown how many IVF centers transfer "abnormal" embryos and with what efficiency.
METHODS: We performed a worldwide web-survey of IVF centers to elucidate PGT-A related practice patterns including transfer of human embryos found "abnormal" by PGT-A. Participating centers reflected in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA, Canada, Europe, Asia, South America, and Africa.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one IVF centers completed the survey; 125 (83%) reported utilization of PGT-A. Europe had the highest utilization (32.3%), followed by the USA and Canada combined at 29.1%. The leading indications for PGT-A were advanced maternal age (77%), followed by recurrent implantation failure (70%), unexplained pregnancy loss (65%), and sex determination (25%); 14% of respondents used PGT-A for all of their IVF cycles; 20% of IVF units reported transfers of chromosomally "abnormal" embryos, and 56% of these took place in the USA, followed by Asia in 20%. Remarkably, 106 (49.3%) cycles resulted in ongoing pregnancies (n = 50) or live births (n = 56). Miscarriages were rare (n = 20; 9.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: The transfers of "abnormal" embryos by PGT-A offered robust pregnancy and live birth chances with low miscarriage rates. These data further strengthen the argument that PGT-A cannot reliably determine which embryos should or should not be transferred and leads to disposal of many normal embryos with excellent pregnancy potential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Embryo mosaicism; IVF; Pre-implantation genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31236830      PMCID: PMC6707985          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01510-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  18 in total

1.  Progesterone support in IVF: is evidence-based medicine translated to clinical practice? A worldwide web-based survey.

Authors:  Edi Vaisbuch; Milton Leong; Zeev Shoham
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Healthy Babies after Intrauterine Transfer of Mosaic Aneuploid Blastocysts.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Maria Giulia Minasi; Francesco Fiorentino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Gayathree Murugappan; Lora K Shahine; Candice O Perfetto; Lee R Hickok; Ruth B Lathi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Preimplantation genetic screening: what is the clinical efficiency?

Authors:  Richard J Paulson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Chromosomal mosaicism detected during preimplantation genetic screening: results of a worldwide Web-based survey.

Authors:  Ariel Weissman; Gon Shoham; Zeev Shoham; Simon Fishel; Milton Leong; Yuval Yaron
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Implantation potential of mosaic embryos.

Authors:  Belén Lledó; Ruth Morales; Jose Antonio Ortiz; Helena Blanca; Jorge Ten; Joaquín Llácer; Rafael Bernabeu
Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.061

7.  Detailed investigation into the cytogenetic constitution and pregnancy outcome of replacing mosaic blastocysts detected with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Joshua Blazek; Michael Large; Pedro A Martinez-Ortiz; Haley Nisson; Emmeline Liu; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Andrea Borini; Amie Becker; John Zhang; Susan Maxwell; James Grifo; Dhruti Babariya; Dagan Wells; Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Extent of chromosomal mosaicism influences the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization treatments.

Authors:  Francesca Spinella; Francesco Fiorentino; Anil Biricik; Sara Bono; Alessandra Ruberti; Ettore Cotroneo; Marina Baldi; Elisabetta Cursio; Maria Giulia Minasi; Ermanno Greco
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Accuracy of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is compromised by degree of mosaicism of human embryos.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Vidali; Jeffrey Braverman; Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad; Cynthia Hudson; Yang-Guan Wu; Qi Wang; Lin Zhang; David F Albertini
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Is the hypothesis of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still supportable? A review.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.234

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Early pregnancy loss: the default outcome for fertilized human oocytes.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of morphologically grade CC blastocysts: are they of clinical value?

Authors:  Menghui Li; Mingru Yin; Ling Wu; Zhiguang Yan; Qifeng Lyu; Zheng Yan; Bin Li
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Not even noninvasive cell-free DNA can rescue preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The mechanisms and clinical application of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Xinyuan Li; Yan Hao; Nagwa Elshewy; Xiaoqian Zhu; Zhiguo Zhang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Bioinformatic identification of euploid and aneuploid embryo secretome signatures in IVF culture media based on MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ricardo J Pais; Fady Sharara; Raminta Zmuidinaite; Stephen Butler; Sholeh Keshavarz; Ray Iles
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Depletion of aneuploid cells in human embryos and gastruloids.

Authors:  Min Yang; Tiago Rito; Jakob Metzger; Jeffrey Naftaly; Rohan Soman; Jianjun Hu; David F Albertini; David H Barad; Ali H Brivanlou; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  The PGS/PGT-A controversy in IVF addressed as a formal conflict resolution analysis.

Authors:  Lyka Mochizuki; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Time associations between U.S. birth rates and add-Ons to IVF practice between 2005-2016.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Lyka Mochizuki; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  National Survey Highlights the Urgent Need for Standardisation of Embryo Transfer Techniques in the UK.

Authors:  Lewis Nancarrow; Nicola Tempest; Andrew J Drakeley; Roy Homburg; Richard Russell; Dharani K Hapangama
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Diagnostic efficiency of blastocyst culture medium in noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Jingbo Chen; Lei Jia; Tingting Li; Yingchun Guo; Shujing He; Zhiqiang Zhang; Wenlong Su; Shihui Zhang; Cong Fang
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.