Literature DB >> 31708118

TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands.

Karuna R M van der Meij1, Erik A Sistermans2, Merryn V E Macville3, Servi J C Stevens3, Caroline J Bax4, Mireille N Bekker5, Caterina M Bilardo6, Elles M J Boon1, Marjan Boter7, Karin E M Diderich7, Christine E M de Die-Smulders3, Leonie K Duin8, Brigitte H W Faas9, Ilse Feenstra9, Monique C Haak10, Mariëtte J V Hoffer11, Nicolette S den Hollander11, Iris H I M Hollink7, Fernanda S Jehee7, Maarten F C M Knapen12, Angelique J A Kooper13, Irene M van Langen14, Klaske D Lichtenbelt15, Ingeborg H Linskens6, Merel C van Maarle13, Dick Oepkes10, Mijntje J Pieters16, G Heleen Schuring-Blom15, Esther Sikkel17, Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz13, Dominique F C M Smeets9, Malgorzata I Srebniak7, Ron F Suijkerbuijk13, Gita M Tan-Sindhunata1, A Jeanine E M van der Ven18, Shama L van Zelderen-Bhola1, Lidewij Henneman1, Robert-Jan H Galjaard7, Diane Van Opstal7, Marjan M Weiss1.   

Abstract

The Netherlands launched a nationwide implementation study on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test offered to all pregnant women. This started on April 1, 2017 as the TRIDENT-2 study, licensed by the Dutch Ministry of Health. In the first year, NIPT was performed in 73,239 pregnancies (42% of all pregnancies), 7,239 (4%) chose first-trimester combined testing, and 54% did not participate. The number of trisomies 21 (239, 0.33%), 18 (49, 0.07%), and 13 (55, 0.08%) found in this study is comparable to earlier studies, but the Positive Predictive Values (PPV)-96% for trisomy 21, 98% for trisomy 18, and 53% for trisomy 13-were higher than expected. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were reported on request of the pregnant women; 78% of women chose to have these reported. The number of additional findings was 207 (0.36%); these included other trisomies (101, 0.18%, PPV 6%, many of the remaining 94% of cases are likely confined placental mosaics and possibly clinically significant), structural chromosomal aberrations (95, 0.16%, PPV 32%,) and complex abnormal profiles indicative of maternal malignancies (11, 0.02%, PPV 64%). The implementation of genome-wide NIPT is under debate because the benefits of detecting other fetal chromosomal aberrations must be balanced against the risks of discordant positives, parental anxiety, and a potential increase in (invasive) diagnostic procedures. Our first-year data, including clinical data and laboratory follow-up data, will fuel this debate. Furthermore, we describe how NIPT can successfully be embedded into a national screening program with a single chain for prenatal care including counseling, testing, and follow-up.
Copyright © 2019 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NIPS; NIPT; cfDNA; common trisomies; fetal trisomy; first tier test; genome-wide; implementation study; prenatal screening; rare autosomal trisomies

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31708118      PMCID: PMC6904791          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  43 in total

1.  The influence of SNP-based chromosomal microarray and NIPT on the diagnostic yield in 10,000 fetuses with and without fetal ultrasound anomalies.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Maarten F C M Knapen; Marike Polak; Marieke Joosten; Karin E M Diderich; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marjan Boter; Joan N R Kromosoeto; Daniella Aloysia C M van Hassel; Gido Huijbregts; Wilfred F J van IJcken; Roger Heydanus; Anneke Dijkman; Toon Toolenaar; Femke A T de Vries; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Attie T J I Go; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  A case of confined placental mosaicism with double trisomy associated with stillbirth.

Authors:  L R Goodfellow; G Batra; V Hall; E McHale; A E P Heazell
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Chromosomal mosaicisms in prenatal diagnosis: correlation with first trimester screening and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Christel Eckmann-Scholz; Julia Mallek; Constantin S von Kaisenberg; Norbert K Arnold; Walter Jonat; Siebert Reiner; Almuth Caliebe; Simone Heidemann
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 1.901

4.  The Danish Fetal Medicine Database: establishment, organization and quality assessment of the first trimester screening program for trisomy 21 in Denmark 2008-2012.

Authors:  Charlotte K Ekelund; Olav B Petersen; Finn S Jørgensen; Susanne Kjaergaard; Torben Larsen; Annette W Olesen; Lillian Skibsted; Peter Skovbo; Steffen Sommer; Lene Sperling; Benedicte Stavnstrup; Birgitte Størup; Helle Zingenberg; Niels Uldbjerg; Caroline B Miltoft; Lasse Noergaard; Camilla B Wulff; Ann Tabor
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study.

Authors:  J Nederend; L E M Duijm; M W J Louwman; J H Groenewoud; A B Donkers-van Rossum; A C Voogd
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Genomewide copy number alteration screening of circulating plasma DNA: potential for the detection of incipient tumors.

Authors:  L Lenaerts; P Vandenberghe; N Brison; H Che; M Neofytou; M Verheecke; L Leemans; C Maggen; B Dewaele; L Dehaspe; S Vanderschueren; D Dierickx; V Vandecaveye; F Amant; J R Vermeesch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Genetic screening and democracy: lessons from debating genetic screening criteria in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Carla Geertruida van El; Toine Pieters; Martina Cornel
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-08-30

8.  Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non-invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion.

Authors:  Zandra C Deans; Stephanie Allen; Lucy Jenkins; Farrah Khawaja; Ros J Hastings; Kathy Mann; Simon J Patton; Erik A Sistermans; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Origin and clinical relevance of chromosomal aberrations other than the common trisomies detected by genome-wide NIPS: results of the TRIDENT study.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Merel C van Maarle; Klaske Lichtenbelt; Marjan M Weiss; Heleen Schuring-Blom; Shama L Bhola; Mariette J V Hoffer; Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam; Merryn V Macville; Angelique J A Kooper; Brigitte H W Faas; Lutgarde Govaerts; Gita M Tan-Sindhunata; Nicolette den Hollander; Ilse Feenstra; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Dick Oepkes; Stijn Ghesquiere; Rutger W W Brouwer; Lean Beulen; Sander Bollen; Martin G Elferink; Roy Straver; Lidewij Henneman; Godelieve C Page-Christiaens; Erik A Sistermans
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Women's Experiences and Preferences for Service Delivery of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy in a Public Health Setting: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  50 in total

1.  Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of SNPs and Indels.

Authors:  Tom Rabinowitz; Noam Shomron
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 2.  Rare autosomal trisomies detected by non-invasive prenatal testing: an overview of current knowledge.

Authors:  Lore Lannoo; Khaila van Straaten; Jeroen Breckpot; Nathalie Brison; Luc De Catte; Eftychia Dimitriadou; Eric Legius; Hilde Peeters; Ilse Parijs; Olga Tsuiko; Leen Vancoillie; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Griet Van Buggenhout; Kris Van Den Bogaert; Kristel Van Calsteren; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.351

3.  Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and pregnant women's views on good motherhood: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elisa Garcia; Lidewij Henneman; Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Linda Martin; Isabel Koopmanschap; Mireille N Bekker; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.351

4.  Positive predictive value estimates for noninvasive prenatal testing from data of a prenatal diagnosis laboratory and literature review.

Authors:  Siping Liu; Fang Yang; Qingxian Chang; Bei Jia; Yushuang Xu; Ruifeng Wu; Liyan Li; Weishan Chen; Ailan Yin; Fodi Huang; Suxin Feng; Fenxia Li
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Fragmentomics of urinary cell-free DNA in nuclease knockout mouse models.

Authors:  Meihui Chen; Rebecca W Y Chan; Peter P H Cheung; Meng Ni; Danny K L Wong; Ze Zhou; Mary-Jane L Ma; Liangbo Huang; Xinzhou Xu; Wing-Shan Lee; Guangya Wang; Kathy O Lui; W K Jacky Lam; Jeremy Y C Teoh; Chi-Fai Ng; Peiyong Jiang; K C Allen Chan; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.020

6.  Utility of noninvasive genome-wide screening: a prospective cohort of obstetric patients undergoing diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Stephanie Guseh; Louise Wilkins-Haug; Anjali Kaimal; Lisa Dunn-Albanese; Sophie Adams; Sarah Carroll; Marie Discenza; Lori Dobson; Marney Brillinger; Judith Foster; Samantha Gbur; Hayley Green; Nancy Herrig; Chelsea Mandigo; Michelle Pacione; Penelope Roberts; Abigail Sassaman; Kathleen Steinberg; Courtney Studwell; Kathryn J Gray
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Chromosomal mosaicism: Origins and clinical implications in preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Brynn Levy; Eva R Hoffmann; Rajiv C McCoy; Francesca R Grati
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Understanding False Negative in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Mark I Evans; Ming Chen; David W Britt
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17

9.  Clinical Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Trisomies in Low-Risk and Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Yanfei Xu; Pengzhen Jin; Yu Lei; Yeqing Qian; Yuqing Xu; Miaomiao Wang; Jinglei Jin; Yixuan Yin; Minyue Dong
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter G Scheffer; Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto; Ellis C Becking; Marjan M Weiss; Caroline J Bax; Dick Oepkes; Erik A Sistermans; Lidewij Henneman; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.