| Literature DB >> 31708118 |
Karuna R M van der Meij1, Erik A Sistermans2, Merryn V E Macville3, Servi J C Stevens3, Caroline J Bax4, Mireille N Bekker5, Caterina M Bilardo6, Elles M J Boon1, Marjan Boter7, Karin E M Diderich7, Christine E M de Die-Smulders3, Leonie K Duin8, Brigitte H W Faas9, Ilse Feenstra9, Monique C Haak10, Mariëtte J V Hoffer11, Nicolette S den Hollander11, Iris H I M Hollink7, Fernanda S Jehee7, Maarten F C M Knapen12, Angelique J A Kooper13, Irene M van Langen14, Klaske D Lichtenbelt15, Ingeborg H Linskens6, Merel C van Maarle13, Dick Oepkes10, Mijntje J Pieters16, G Heleen Schuring-Blom15, Esther Sikkel17, Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz13, Dominique F C M Smeets9, Malgorzata I Srebniak7, Ron F Suijkerbuijk13, Gita M Tan-Sindhunata1, A Jeanine E M van der Ven18, Shama L van Zelderen-Bhola1, Lidewij Henneman1, Robert-Jan H Galjaard7, Diane Van Opstal7, Marjan M Weiss1.
Abstract
The Netherlands launched a nationwide implementation study on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test offered to all pregnant women. This started on April 1, 2017 as the TRIDENT-2 study, licensed by the Dutch Ministry of Health. In the first year, NIPT was performed in 73,239 pregnancies (42% of all pregnancies), 7,239 (4%) chose first-trimester combined testing, and 54% did not participate. The number of trisomies 21 (239, 0.33%), 18 (49, 0.07%), and 13 (55, 0.08%) found in this study is comparable to earlier studies, but the Positive Predictive Values (PPV)-96% for trisomy 21, 98% for trisomy 18, and 53% for trisomy 13-were higher than expected. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were reported on request of the pregnant women; 78% of women chose to have these reported. The number of additional findings was 207 (0.36%); these included other trisomies (101, 0.18%, PPV 6%, many of the remaining 94% of cases are likely confined placental mosaics and possibly clinically significant), structural chromosomal aberrations (95, 0.16%, PPV 32%,) and complex abnormal profiles indicative of maternal malignancies (11, 0.02%, PPV 64%). The implementation of genome-wide NIPT is under debate because the benefits of detecting other fetal chromosomal aberrations must be balanced against the risks of discordant positives, parental anxiety, and a potential increase in (invasive) diagnostic procedures. Our first-year data, including clinical data and laboratory follow-up data, will fuel this debate. Furthermore, we describe how NIPT can successfully be embedded into a national screening program with a single chain for prenatal care including counseling, testing, and follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: NIPS; NIPT; cfDNA; common trisomies; fetal trisomy; first tier test; genome-wide; implementation study; prenatal screening; rare autosomal trisomies
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31708118 PMCID: PMC6904791 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hum Genet ISSN: 0002-9297 Impact factor: 11.025