| Literature DB >> 35406474 |
Shadrack M Mutuku1,2, Xander Spotbeen3, Paul J Trim1,2, Marten F Snel1,2, Lisa M Butler1,2,4,5, Johannes V Swinnen3.
Abstract
Due to advances in the detection and management of prostate cancer over the past 20 years, most cases of localised disease are now potentially curable by surgery or radiotherapy, or amenable to active surveillance without treatment. However, this has given rise to a new dilemma for disease management; the inability to distinguish indolent from lethal, aggressive forms of prostate cancer, leading to substantial overtreatment of some patients and delayed intervention for others. Driving this uncertainty is the critical deficit of novel targets for systemic therapy and of validated biomarkers that can inform treatment decision-making and to select and monitor therapy. In part, this lack of progress reflects the inherent challenge of undertaking target and biomarker discovery in clinical prostate tumours, which are cellularly heterogeneous and multifocal, necessitating the use of spatial analytical approaches. In this review, the principles of mass spectrometry-based lipid imaging and complementary gene-based spatial omics technologies, their application to prostate cancer and recent advancements in these technologies are considered. We put in perspective studies that describe spatially-resolved lipid maps and metabolic genes that are associated with prostate tumours compared to benign tissue and increased risk of disease progression, with the aim of evaluating the future implementation of spatial lipidomics and complementary transcriptomics for prognostication, target identification and treatment decision-making for prostate cancer.Entities:
Keywords: MALDI; biomarkers; lipidomics; lipids; mass spectrometry imaging; metabolomics; prostate cancer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406474 PMCID: PMC8997139 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1MALDI-MSI of prostate tumours. Tissue morphology (H&E digital scan) of multifocal disease in prostate tissue and spatial segmentation using clustering in SCiLS Lab and R Cardinal from a serial imaged section. The associated mass spectra show different m/z features for cancer—red, normal—blue spectra, stroma—pink, and inflammation—yellow. Average spectra are normalised to total ion count method.
Key studies using MSI as a spatial tool for prostate cancer metabolomics and lipidomics.
| Author | Method | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Butler et al., 2021 | ESI-MS/MS | Association of lipid profiles to malignancy status in clinical biopsies and lipid changes in response to metabolic targeting agents |
| Young et al., 2021 | MALDI-MSI OzID | Isomer-resolved lipidomics detects non-canonical fatty acids (reflecting different desaturase activities) present in different regions of the PCa TME, providing support for discrete localisation of desaturase enzymes |
| Andersen et al., 2021 | MALDI TOF MSI | Lipid and metabolite composition was distinct between stromal, non-cancerous epithelium, and PCa. Lysophospholipids had lower abundance in PCa versus non-cancerous epithelium, while PE and PI lipids were higher in PCa. |
| Randall et al., 2019 | MALDI FT-ICR MSI, | Prostate tumours can be differentiated using different Gleason grades based on metabolomic differences |
| Morse et al., 2019 | DESI-MSI | Logistic regression and PCA/LDA model of lipid and metabolite classifiers can reliably identify cancer and distinguish Gleason grade groups |
| Banerjee et al., 2017 | DESI-MSI | LASSO model identified glucose and citrate as predictors of PCa and normal tissue |
| Wang et al., 2017 | MALDI FT-ICR | Increased energy charge and low abundance of neutral triglycerides in cancerous tissue |
| Goto et al., 2015 | MALDI-MSI | LPC (16:0) and SM (d18:1/16:0) were lower in tumour compared to benign epithelium. LPA (16:0) was an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy |
| Goto et al., 2014 | MALDI-MSI | PI species were more abundant in cancer compared to benign epithelium: PI (18:0/18:1) PI (18:0/20:3) PI (18:0/20:2) |