Literature DB >> 14739906

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

David G Bostwick1, Junqi Qian.   

Abstract

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is now accepted as the most likely preinvasive stage of adenocarcinoma, almost two decades after its first formal description. PIN has a high predictive value as a marker for adenocarcinoma, and its identification warrants repeat biopsy for concurrent or subsequent invasive carcinoma. The only method of detection is biopsy; PIN does not significantly elevate serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration or its derivatives and cannot be detected by current imaging techniques, including ultrasound. Most patients with PIN will develop carcinoma within 10 years. PIN is associated with progressive abnormalities of phenotype and genotype, which are similar to cancer rather than normal prostatic epithelium, indicating impairment of cell differentiation with advancing stages of prostatic carcinogenesis. Androgen deprivation therapy decreases the prevalence and extent of PIN, suggesting that this form of treatment may play a role in chemoprevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14739906     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  48 in total

1.  Telomere attrition in isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and surrounding stroma is predictive of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Michael Joshua; Bisera Vukovic; Ilan Braude; Sundus Hussein; Maria Zielenska; John Srigley; Andrew Evans; Jeremy Andrew Squire
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Is repeat biopsy for isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia necessary?

Authors:  Arnold I Chin; Dhiren S Dave; Jacob Rajfer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

3.  A cancer DNA phenotype in healthy prostates, conserved in tumors and adjacent normal cells, implies a relationship to carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Donald C Malins; Naomi K Gilman; Virginia M Green; Thomas M Wheeler; Edward A Barker; Katie M Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mutation Profiling Indicates High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia as Distant Precursors of Adjacent Invasive Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sean J Gerrin; Adam G Sowalsky; Steven P Balk; Huihui Ye
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 5.  The benign mimickers of prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yuqiao Xu; Yingmei Wang; Ru Zhou; Haiyang Li; Hong Cheng; Zhe Wang; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  [Histopathology reports of findings of prostate needle biopsies. Individual treatment].

Authors:  I Damjanoski; J Müller; T J Schnöller; R Küfer; L Rinnab
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Genetically engineered mouse models of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maxime Parisotto; Daniel Metzger
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion predicts subsequent detection of prostate cancer in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Kyung Park; James T Dalton; Ramesh Narayanan; Christopher E Barbieri; Michael L Hancock; David G Bostwick; Mitchell S Steiner; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Genomic hypomethylation and CpG island hypermethylation in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm.

Authors:  Nam-Yun Cho; Jung Ho Kim; Kyung Chul Moon; Gyeong Hoon Kang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 10.  Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.