| Literature DB >> 35310344 |
Hwa Seung Han1, Song Yi Koo1, Ki Young Choi1,2.
Abstract
Over thousands of years, natural bioactive compounds derived from plants (bioactive phytocompounds, BPCs) have been used worldwide to address human health issues. Today, they are a significant resource for drug discovery in the development of modern medicines. Although many BPCs have promising biological activities, most of them cannot be effectively utilized in drugs for therapeutic applications because of their inherent limitations of low solubility, structural instability, short half-life, poor bioavailability, and non-specific distribution to organs. Researchers have utilized emerging nanoformulation (NF) technologies to overcome these limitations as they have demonstrated great potential to improve the solubility, stability, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of BPCs. This review exemplifies NF strategies for resolving the issues associated with BPCs and summarizes recent advances in their preclinical and clinical applications for imaging and therapy. This review also highlights how innovative NF technologies play a leading role in next-generation BPC-based drug development for extended therapeutic applications. Finally, this review discusses the opportunities to take BPCs with meaningful clinical impact from bench to bedside and extend the patent life of BPC-based medicines with new formulations or application to new adjacent diseases beyond the primary drug indications.Entities:
Keywords: Drug delivery; Nanoformulation; Natural products; Phototherapy; Phytocompound
Year: 2021 PMID: 35310344 PMCID: PMC8892098 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1Chemical structures of representative bioactive phytocompounds.
Characteristics of bioactive phytocompounds and their clinical statuses.
| Natural compound | Natural resource | Solubility (log | Biological activity | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artemisinin | Artemisia annua | 3.11 | Anticancer | Phase 3 |
| Catechin | Green tea, beans | 1.80 | Antioxidant | Phase 4 |
| Caffeic acid | Coffee, Eucalyptus | 1.53 | Anticancer, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory | Phase 3 |
| Camptothecin | Stem wood of the Chinese tree | 1.74 | Anticancer | Phase 1 |
| Combretastatin | Bark of | 2.34 | Anticancer | Phase 2 |
| Curcumin | Tumeric | 4.12 | Inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, anti-inflammatory | Phase 4 |
| EGCG | Green tea, white tea, black tea | 3.08 | Antioxidant, chemopreventive | Phase 3 |
| Epicatechin | Woody plants | 1.8 | Antioxidant | Phase 2 |
| Genistein | Plants (lupins, fava beans, soybeans) | 3.08 | Anticancer, anti-inflammatory | Phase 3 |
| Lycopene | tomato | 11.93 | Antioxidant, anticancer | Phase 4 |
| Paclitaxel | Bark of Pacific yew tree | 3.00 | Mitotic inhibitor in cancer chemotherapy | Approved (Taxol®): |
| Quercetin | Fruits, red onions, kale | 2.16 | Anti-inflammatory, anticancer | Phase 3 |
| Resveratrol | Grapes, blueberries, raspberries, mulberries | 3.4 | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, anti-carcinogenic | Phase 4 |
| Salvianolic acid B | Red sage | 4.99 | Antioxidant, angiogenetic | Phase 2 |
| Silibinin | Milk thistle, coffee | 2.63 | Hepatoprotective, anticancer | Phase 4 |
| Sinomenine | Roots of | 1.83 | Anti-inflammatory, anti-rheumatic | Phase 3 |
| Sulforaphane | Brassica vegetables | 0.22 | Anticancer, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory | Phase 2 |
| Thymoquinone | Herbs, spices | 2.55 | Hepatoprotective, antioxidant, anticancer | Phase 2 |
| Ursolic acid | Fruits (waxes of apples, pears) | 6.58 | Antitumor, antioxidant | Phase 2 |
log P was obtained from ChemAxon.
Clinical status was obtained from http://clinicaltrials.gov (top clinical status in drugs of intervention category).
Representative clinical trials of BPC-based nanomedicine.
| Name | Formulation type | Indication | Clinical status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camptothecin | PEG–drug conjugate | Gastric cancer | Phase 2 |
| Polyglutamic acid–drug conjugate | Colon cancer, ovarian cancer | Phase1/2 | |
| Cyclodextrin NP | Solid tumors, renal cell carcinoma, rectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer | Phase 1/2 | |
| HPMA–drug conjugate | Solid tumors | Phase 1 | |
| Fleximer–drug conjugate | Gastric cancer, lung cancer | Phase 1 | |
| Curcumin | Liposome | Advanced cancer | Phase1 |
| Irinotecan | Liposome | Metastatic pancreatic cancer | Onivyde® |
| Paclitaxel | NPs albumin-bound | Breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer | Abraxane® |
| Micelle | Ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer | Apealea® | |
| PEG-PLA polymeric micelle | Breast cancer, lung cancer | Genexol-PM® | |
| Polymeric micelle | Advanced breast cancer | Phase 3 | |
| Polyglutamic acid–drug conjugate | Lung cancer, ovarian cancer | Phase 3 | |
| DHA–drug conjugate | Melanoma, liver cancer, adenocarcinoma, kidney cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer | Phase 2/3 | |
| PEG-PAA polymeric micelle | Gastric cancer, breast cancer | Phase 2/3 | |
| Liposome | Triple-negative breast cancer | Phase 2 | |
| Liposome | Solid tumors, gastric cancer, metastatic breast cancer | Phase 2 | |
| Liposome | Ovarian cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer | Phase1/2 | |
| Polymeric NPs | Peritoneal neoplasms | Phase 1 | |
| Polymeric micelle | Ovarian cancer | Phase 1 | |
| HPMA–drug conjugate | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | |
| Vincristine | Liposome | Acute lymphoid leukemia | Marqibo® |
Indication and clinical status were obtained from http://clinicaltrials.gov (top clinical status in drugs of intervention category).
Fig. 2A) Number of publications related to formulated BPCs per year. B) Publication proportions of formulated BPCs from 1985 to 2019. The data were obtained from PubMed using the following keywords: natural compound, natural product, liposome, nanoemulsion, solid lipid nanoparticle, phytosome, nanoparticle, nanostructured lipid carrier, formulation.
Fig. 3Schematic illustration of representative NF designs for BPCs.
Formulations and characteristics of bioactive phytocompound-based nanomedicine.
| Type | Natural compound | Formulation method | L.C (%) | Size (nm) | Features | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liposomes | ART | Thin-film hydration | -/90 | 76 ± 10 | pH-responsive ART dimer in lipid formulation | [ |
| CCM | -/50 | 100 ± 23 | Entrapment of CCM by CD complexation | [ | ||
| -/76 | 100 | Rapid CCM release under HFMF exposure | [ | |||
| Cuc E | -/98 | 140–350 | Changes of lipid membrane structure by Cuc E encapsulation | [ | ||
| EB | -/85 | 500 -734 | Optimization of EB loaded formulations depends on composition parameters | [ | ||
| MA | -/40 | 293 | Optimized MA loaded liposomal formulation by size and storage temperature | [ | ||
| Melanin | 9/89 | 300 | Photothermal effect under 808 nm laser | [ | ||
| Quercetin | -/90 | 182 ± 1 | Controlled | [ | ||
| RVT | -/78 | 122–140 | Various factor-based RVT loaded liposomal characteristics: pH, ionic strength, and temperature | [ | ||
| SA | -/96 | 21 ± 1 | Increase in the stability of SA via steric hindrance by TPGS-based liposomal bilayer | [ | ||
| TMP | -/86 | 168 ± 14 | Penetration of TMP in blood-brain barrier models | [ | ||
| Vitamin C | -/48 | 67 ± 6 | Change of vitamin C's stability and skin permeation by the content of pectin in liposomal structure. | [ | ||
| Nano | BCL | Emulsification and high-pressure homogenization | -/99 | 90 | Hemp oil-based NE with reduced surfactants for oral delivery of BCL | [ |
| CCM | Emulsification | -/91 | 103 ± 11 | Characteristics of formulation depend on vegetable oil for dissolution of CCM: encapsulation efficiency, size, and bioavailability | [ | |
| Imperatorin | Ionic gelation | -/90 | 168 ± 2 | Optimization of lipid microsphere formulation for response surface-central composite design | [ | |
| Lycopene | High-pressure homogenization | -/51 | 184 ± 20 | [ | ||
| β-sitosterol | Emulsification | -/72-87 | 163–258 | Formation of lipid formulations by combination of natural oils and lipids | [ | |
| TQ | Ionic gelation | -/99 | 95 ± 7 | TQ-loaded mucoadhesive NE for intranasal administration | [ | |
| Self-assembled NPs or other NPs | CCM | Ionic gelation | -/50 | 70–90 | LDH-NP based photodynamic effects under 465 nm laser | [ |
| Opposite charge ion precipitation | ∼8/- | 63 | [ | |||
| Physical encapsulation | 7/85 | 37 ± 6 | Photoprotectivity effect of PLGA-CCM-NP under UV irradiation | [ | ||
| -/89 | 100 | MRI-guided photochemotherapy NIR light-responsive CCM release from nanosheets | [ | |||
| EGCG | Physical encapsulation | -/- | 109 ± 30 | Conjugated EGCG to end-HA (98% degree of substitution) Loading of cisplatin to EGCG core in HA-EGCG micelle | [ | |
| Gossypol | Nanoprecipitation | 91/97 | 43 ± 2 | Ultrahigh drug loading by π–π stacking (91%) | [ | |
| Lycopene | Chemical conjugation | 9/89 | 152 ± 32 | Structural antioxidant property by EGCG for protection of lycopene | [ | |
| PTX | Solvent evaporation | -/42 | 43 | [ | ||
| QCT | Nanoprecipitation | 29/81 | 100 | Co-delivery of QCT and DOX using MSN | [ | |
| Vitamin E | Physical interaction | -/99 | 130–350 | Polysaccharide-based NP film formulation including vitamin E for topical administration | [ | |
| NLCs | Bixin | High-pressure homogenization | 17.9/>99 | 136–353 | Increase in uptake and localization at liver | [ |
| ZER | High-shear homogenization | /99 | 52 | stable at 4, 25, and 40 for at least one month. | [ | |
| Niosomes | Boswellic acid | Co-acervation phase separation | -/98 | 708 | Topical proniosomal gel with enhanced bioavailability | [ |
| CCM | -/59 | 71 ± 1 | Fast production of CCM-loaded niosomes with small size in a single step | [ | ||
| α-M | Thin-film hydration | -/99 | 180 ± 30 | Relation between skin permeation and concentration of mangostin by non-ionic surfactant | [ | |
| OXY | Microfluidic mixing | >5/>84 | 96–108 | Optimized formulation using NLC and SLN for improved oral bioavailability | [ | |
| Phytosomes | Apigenin | Sequential co-loading prior to thin film evaporation | 31/99 | 361–400 | Optimal entrapment method for multiple phenolic flavonoids in a single entity Three kinds of surfactant effect: stability, antioxidant capacity, and loading efficiency; physicochemical properties of NEs | [ |
| CCM | -/>75 | |||||
| Kaempferol | 34/99 | |||||
| QCT | High-shear homogenization | 31/98 | 376 ± 34 | Optimal entrapment method for multiple phenolic flavonoids in a single entity | [ | |
| SLNs | CCM | Hot homogenization | -/49 | 58 ± 13 | Ionotropic gelation of alginate by cross-linking with calcium ions | [ |
ART: artemisinin; BCL: baicalein; CuC E: cucurbitacin E; CCM: curcumin; DOX: doxorubicin; DPA: dopamine; EB: embelin; EGCG: epigallocate-chin-3-O-gallate; LDH: layered double hydroxide; LF: lactoferrin; MA: madecassoside; MSN: mesoporous silica nanoparticles; NE: nanoemulsion; NF: nanoformulation; NLC: nanostructured lipid carriers; NP: nanoparticle; OEGCG: oligomerized (−)-epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate; OXY: oxyreseveratol; PLGA: poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid; PTX: paclitaxel; PPB: pheophorbide; QCT: quercetin; RVT: resveratrol; SLN: solid lipid nanoparticles; SFN: sulforaphane; SA: syringic acid; TMP: tetramethylpyrazine; TQ: thymoquinone; ZER: zerumbone; α-M: α-mangostin.
Therapeutic application of bioactive phytocompound-based nanomedicine for disease treatment.
| Category | Type | Therapeutic agent | Target | Therapeutic outcome | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anticancer | Liposome | CCM | Breast cancer | Apoptotic cell death in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells | [ |
| Breast/lung cancer | Cytotoxic effects on MCF-7 and A549 cells | [ | |||
| Celastrol | Prostate cancer | Anticancer effects on vertebral cancer of prostate cells | [ | ||
| GEVPG | Breast/lung cancer | [ | |||
| GCK | Lung cancer | Hypersensitizing effect on A549 cancer cells | [ | ||
| QCT | Breast cancer | Anticancer effect of liposomal quercetin on MCF-7 cancer cells | [ | ||
| SFN | Breast cancer | Combination therapy with doxorubicin for MDA-MB-231 cancer cells | [ | ||
| WG | Liver cancer | Increase in anticancer effect on HepG2 cancer cells by targetable GA-modified liposomes (1.5 times of free WG) | [ | ||
| Nano emulsion | Catechin | Prostate cancer | Apoptosis-based Inhibition of PC-3 cancer cell proliferation | [ | |
| PTX | Brain cancer | Increase in | [ | ||
| Tocotrienol | Epithelial cancer | Increase in anticancer activity in SCC4 and A431 cancer cells (5–6 times of free tocotrienol) | [ | ||
| Self-assembled NPs or other NPs | Betulin | Cervical cancer | Anticancerous activity against SiHa cancer cells. | [ | |
| CCM | Prostate cancer | Cytotoxic effects on DU145 cancer cells High hemocompatibility (<0.1% hemolysis) | [ | ||
| Breast cancer | Increase in CCM's stability (48 times of free CCM) Increase in anticancer activity to MCF-7 cancer cells (1.8 times of free CCM) | [ | |||
| CHE | Liver cancer | [ | |||
| DI | Cervical cancer | Antiproliferative activity against human cervical cancer Hela cells. | [ | ||
| Gossypol | Prostate cancer | High maximum tolerated dose (>60 mg/kg) Prolonged circulation in the bloodstream (>192 h) | [ | ||
| Hesperetin | Colon cancer | Lower IC value (7 times of free hesperetin) Induction of apoptosis in HCT15 cancer cells | [ | ||
| QCT | Gastric cancer | Anticancer effect on SGC7901/ADR cells | [ | ||
| Breast/lung cancer | Increase in encapsulation efficiency of QCT (80%) Lower IC value (1.6 times of free QCT) | [ | |||
| Shikonin | Ovarian cancer | Cytotoxicity towards OVCAR-5 cancer cells (90% inhibition at 48 h) | [ | ||
| PTX | Ovarian cancer | Antitumor effect on A2780 cancer cells | [ | ||
| Breast cancer | Cytotoxicity towards SK-BR-3 cancer cells (3 times of free PTX) | [ | |||
| Prostate cancer | High tolerated dose (100–120 mg PTX/kg) Antitumor activity in PC-3 cancer cells | [ | |||
| NLC | TQ | Liver/breast cancer | Anti-metastasis effect on the lungs Decrease in ROS level | [ | |
| ZER | Leukemia | Anti-leukemic effect on Jurkat cells | [ | ||
| Niosome | LAW | Breast cancer | Increase in | [ | |
| Phytosome | RVT | Prostate cancer | High hemocompatibility (<0.1% hemolysis) | [ | |
| Anti-inflammation | Liposome | SA | Hepatic | Increase in oral bioavailability and liver accumulation of SA (9.8 times of free SA) | [ |
| Self-assembled NPs or other NPs | BBR | Diabetes | Decrease in ROS generation (∼3.5 times of free BBR) Decrease in oxidative stress (∼5.0 times of free BBR) | [ | |
| EB | Ulcerative colitis | Anti-inflammatory activity by an increased accumulation in colon tissue | [ | ||
| EGCG | Psoriasis | Decrease in psoriasiform pathological markers (p < 0.01) 20-fold dose advantage over free EGCG | [ | ||
| Paeonol | Pigment disorders | Decrease in skin melanin content after combinational treatment Increase in anti-melanogenesis and reduced toxicity | [ | ||
| Paeonol Salidroside | |||||
| SCU | Retinopathy | Alleviation of structural disorder of intraretinal neovessels in the retina induced by diabetes | [ | ||
| NLC | TQ | Gastric ulcer | Gastroprotective activity against ulcers Decrease in cytotoxic effect to normal human hepatic cell (1.9 times of free TQ) | [ | |
| Niosome | CCM | Odema | Increase in | [ | |
| EB | Diabetes | Increase in hypoglycemic activity and antioxidant efficacy (1.7 times of free EB) | [ | ||
| Phytosome | Sinigrin | Skin wound | Increased wound healing (1.4 times of free Sinigrin) | [ | |
| QCT | Menopause | Ameliorating effect in inflammation, oxidative stress, bone, lipid, blood glucose, and weight gain parameters | [ | ||
| SLN | Bixingin | Hepatic injury | Alleviation in histopathological feature (moderate to absence or mild appearance) | [ | |
| SG | Gastric ulcer | Increase in protective effect on ethanol-induced gastric ulcers in mice (1.8 times of free SG) | [ | ||
| Anti-bacterial | Liposome | Allicin | Food preservation | Antimicrobial effect against | [ |
| Phytosome | Gingerol | Respiratory infection | Increase in antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity for oral adsorption (20 times of free Gingerol) | [ | |
| Anti-oxidant | Nano emulsion | TQ | Cerebral Ischemia | Increase in bioavailability (20 times of free TQ) | [ |
| Self-assembled NPs or other NPs | Eugenol | Cerebral Ischemia | Increase in pharmacokinetics after intravenous dose (7.7 times of free Eugenol) | [ | |
| Rg3 | Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion | Improved cardiac function and reduced infarct size by reactive oxygen species-responsive Rg3 release | [ | ||
| RU | Cerebral Ischemia | Increase in brain targeting after intranasal administration (3.2 times of free RU) | [ | ||
| Anti-neuro degeneration | Self-assembled NPs or other NPs | RU | Alzheimer's diseases | Increase in bioavailability (159 times of free RU) | [ |
| Schisantherin A | Parkinson's diseases | Neuroprotective effect on PD models of zebrafish | [ |
BBR: berberine; CB: celecoxib; CHE: chelerythrine; CCM: curcumin; DI: 15,16-dihydrotanshinone I; DOX: doxorubicin; EB: embelin; EGCG: epigallocate-chin-3-O-gallate; GCK: ginsenoside compound K; Rg3: ginsenoside Rg3; GA: glycyrrhetinic acid; GEVPG: glucoevatromonoside; LAW: lawsone; NLC: nanostructured lipid carriers; PTX: paclitaxel; PD: Parkinson's disease; PK: pharmacokinetic; RVT: resveratrol; RU: Rutin; SG: sanguinarine; SCU: scutellarin; SLN: solid lipid nanoparticles; SFN: sulforaphane; SA: syringic acid; TQ: thymoquinone; WG: wogonin; ZER: zerumbone.
Fig. 4A) Preparation procedure for lipid calcium phosphate-quercetin phosphate (LCP-QP.) B) Transmission electron microscopy image of LCP-QP final particles. C) Tumor volume changes for LCP-QP, cisplatin nanoparticles (LPC), and LCP-QP + LPC on a stroma-rich UMUC3 bladder cancer xenograft model after five IV injections (blue arrows, four mice per group. D), E), F) Effects of different treatments on the inhibition of fibroblast growth and Masson's trichrome stain for collagen and quantification results expressed as a percentage of total cell number. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, n = 5. Adapted with permission [133]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 5A) Principle scheme of the synthesis of quercetin-modified Zr-MOF nanoparticle (Zr-MOF-QU) nanocarriers and schematic illustration of the nanoparticle-based therapeutic principle for dual sensitization radiation therapy of tumors and the mechanism of relieving hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment B) Tumor volumes of different groups in A549 tumor-bearing mice. C) Representative results of an A549 MTT assay in different groups, including a control, RT, QU + RT, Zr-MOF + RT, and Zr-MOF-QU + RT. The results from 24 to 48 h show a statistically significant difference. The p values were calculated by Student's t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. D), E) Intensity expression levels of HIF-1a and CA IX in control, RT, QU + RT, Zr-MOF + RT, and Zr-MOF-QU + RT groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Adapted with permission [136]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 6A) Effects of early CLT and CLT-AN (Celastrol-albumin) treatment on 24-h urinary protein excretion in anti-Thy1.1 nephritic rats on day 5 after disease induction. B) Glomerular histology revealed by PAS staining of kidney tissue sections from anti-Thy1.1 nephritic rats on day 5 after early treatment with CLT and CLT-AN; the scale bars represent 20 μm. C) Effects of early CLT and CLT-AN treatment on total glomerular cellularity on day 5 after disease induction. D) Effects of early CLT or CLT-AN treatment on ECM deposition on day 5 after disease induction. For each animal group, 150 glomeruli were analyzed and ECM deposition was graded semi-quantitatively, as described in Methods. Anti-inflammatory effects of CLT and CLT-AN in anti-Thy1.1 nephritic rats. Real-time PCR analysis of renal mRNA levels of MCP-1 E), ICAM-1 F), IL-6 G), IL-1β H) in anti-Thy1.1 nephritic rats on day 1 after treatment with CLT or CLT-AN. Data are shown as normalized fold expressions relative to normal group using β-actin mRNA as internal control. The data in A), C), and H) are mean ± s.d. (n = 5), and those in I) are mean ± s.d. (n = 3). Adapted with permission [143]. Copyright 2017, Springer Nature.
Fig. 7A) Schematic illustration of berberine-loaded liposome (BB-lips) for treatment of myocardial infarction. B) Masson's trichrome stain to indicate the infarcted area. C) Infiltration of macrophages into infarcted heart tissue. MAC3 staining is shown in brown. D) Liposomes visualized with confocal microscopy. Cy5.5 is shown in green and merged with heart tissue obtained under a bright field. The infarct region is indicated by a dashed line (B–D). E) Co-localization of liposomes (green) and macrophages (CD68 staining in red) in infarct area in the heart indicated by white arrowheads, as observed by confocal microscopy. Nuclear staining was performed with DAPI (blue). F) Accumulation of control liposomes in infarcted tissue visualized with IVIS spectrum imaging system. G) Accumulation of Cy5.5-liposomes in the infarcted tissue visualized with IVIS spectrum imaging system. Infarct region is indicated by arrowheads (F–G). Adapted with permission [145]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
Fig. 8A) Dissolution test of silibinin (SB) (filled circle: pH 7.4; filled triangle: pH 1.2) and SB nanoparticles (SB-NPs) (open circle: pH 7.4; open triangle: pH 1.2) by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Data shown are mean ± SEM or representative analysis from three independent experiments. B) Cytotoxicity evaluation of SB-NPs on Huh-7 cells by 2,3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5- sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium-5- carboxyanilide inner salt assay. All data represent mean ± SEM (*p < 0.05) from three independent experiments. C) Determination of antiviral dose–response effect of SB-NPs against reporter cell culture-derived HCV particle (HCVcc) infection (multiplicity of infection (MOI) = 0.01) by luciferase assay. All data represent mean ± SEM (*p < 0.05) from three independent experiments. D) Effect of SB-NPs on HCV-induced oxidative stress in Huh-7 cells by 2’,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (H2DCFDA) staining analysis. E) Haemolytic analysis of SB-NP treatment effect on human erythrocytes. F) SB-NPs inhibit cell culture-derived HCVcc infection of primary human hepatocytes. Primary human hepatocytes inoculated with reporter HCVcc (MOI = 0.01) were treated with clarified insoluble suspension of silibinin in water (SB-DW), silibinin dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (SB-DMSO), and SB-NPs and analyzed for luciferase reporter activity following incubation. Interferon (IFN)-α (1000 IU/mL) served as a positive control. Data shown are mean ± SEM (*p < 0.05) from three independent experiments. RLU: relative light units. Adapted with permission [161]. Copyright 2017, BMJ journals.
Fig. 9A) Transmission electron microscopy image of pegylated melanin nanoparticles (PEG-MeNPs). B) Effect of PEG, SOD, MeNPs, and PEG-MeNPs on EPR signals of DEPMPO-OOH. C) O2 production from KO2 solution (100 μM) with vs without PEG-MeNPs. The inset is a digital image of the PEG-MeNP solution before vs after KO2 addition. The assay was performed in triplicate. D) O2 production from KO2 solution (100 μM) catalyzed by SOD vs PEG-MeNPs. The concentration of PEG-MeNPs for catalysis is 0.1 nM. Assay was performed in triplicate. E) Levels of ROS in LPS-stimulated macrophages with different PEG-MeNP concentrations. F) Representative images of TTC-stained brain slices from different groups (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs saline control). Adapted with permission [171]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 10A) Nanoformulated α-mangostine (NP(α-M)) selectively enhanced LDLR expression in microglia B) rather than astrocytes. C). Seven-month-old APP/PS1 mice were treated daily with NP(α-M) at an α-M dose of 1 mg/kg intravenously via the tail vein for 4 weeks. CD11b and GFAP were used as markers of microglia and astrocytes, respectively. The scale bar represents 20 μm. NP(α-M) rescued memory deficits in SAMP8 mice. Seven-month-old SAMP8 mice were treated daily with α-M formulations at an α-M dose of 1 mg/kg intravenously via the tail vein for 4 weeks with age-matched SAMP8 and SAMR1 mice given saline as the negative and normal controls, respectively. D) Escape latency, ⁎p < 0.05, ⁎⁎⁎p < 0.001, significantly different from that of the negative control by Student's t-test. E) Number of times crossing the escape platform used to locate. F) Percentage of time spent in the quadrant of the escape platform used to locate. Adapted with permission [183]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
Fig. 11A) Schematic illustration of the process of imaging-guided therapy of HepG2 tumor in vivo by Sorafenib-loaded PEG-MNPs (SRF-MNPs). B) Representative decay-corrected coronal (top) and transaxial (bottom) small-animal PET images (upper layer) and overlaid CT (grey) and PET (color) images (bottom layer) of HepG2 tumor (region enveloped by white dotted line) acquired at 2, 4, and 24 h after tail vein injection of 64Cu-radiolabled (70.0 ± 5.0 μCi) SRF-MNPs. C) PA images, ultrasound (US) images, and overlaid PA (green) and US images (grey) of HepG2 tumor (region enveloped by yellow dotted line) before and after tail vein injection of 200 μL of SRF-MNP (SRF: 10 mg kg ˉ1; MNP: 40 mg kg ˉ1) in living mice (excitation wavelength = 680 nm for PAI). D) Histological sections of tumor tissue with TUNEL staining ( × 10). Nuclei are stained blue (DAPI staining, × 10), and apoptotic cells are stained green (TUNEL staining, × 10). The scale bar represents 100 μm. Adapted with permission [229]. Copyright 2015, Wiley Online Library.
Fig. 12Chemical structures of potential bioactive phytocompounds discussed in this review.
Potential BPCs for treatment of various human diseases.
| Natural compound | Natural resource | Solubility (logP) | Biological activity | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allicin | Garlic | 2.02 | Antimicrobial, anticancer | [ |
| Apigenin | Parsley, celery, celeriac, chamomile tea | 2.71 | Antimicrobial, anticancer | [ |
| Arborinine | Herbs, spices (Ruta graveolens) | 3.15 | Anticancer | [ |
| Baicalein | Roots of | 2.71 | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory | [ |
| Berberine | Berberis | −1.3 | Antiarrhythmic action, anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic | [ |
| Betulin | Bark of birch trees | 6.17 | Anticancer | [ |
| Bixin | Annatto | 5.53 | Apoptotic, antioxidant | [ |
| Boswellic acid | 6.58 | Apoptosis of cancer cells, anti-inflammatory | [ | |
| Celastrol | Root extracts of Tripterygium wilfordii | 5.33 | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer | [ |
| Chelerythrine | −0.88 | Antibacterial | [ | |
| Cinnamaldehyde | Bark of cinnamon trees | 1.98 | Antibacterial | [ |
| Curcubitacin E | Cucurbitaceae | 3.48 | Anticancer, anti-inflammatory | [ |
| 15,16-Dihydrotanshinone I | Salvia miltiorrhiza | – | Antiproliferative | [ |
| Gambogic acid | 7.78 | Antitumor | [ | |
| Ellagic acid | Fruits, vegetables (pomegranate) | 2.32 | Antiproliferative, antioxidant | [ |
| Embelin | Embelia ribes | 4.18 | Anti-inflammatory | [ |
| Eugenol | Clove oil, basil, cinnamon, nutmeg | 2.61 | Antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory | [ |
| 6-gingerol (Gingerol) | Ginger | 3.62 | Tumor suppressive | [ |
| Ginsenoside compound K | – | Antidementia, antitumor, anti-inflammatory | [ | |
| Hesperetin | Peppermint, lemon, sweet orange | 2.68 | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic, anticarcinogenic | [ |
| Hydroxytyrosol | Extra virgin olive oil | 0.89 | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cancer preventive | [ |
| Imperatorin | Parsnips, lovages, parsley | 3.15 | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic | [ |
| Kaempferol | Plants (Pteridophyta, Pinophyta, Angiospermae) | 2.46 | Anticancer | [ |
| Luteolin | Celery, broccoli, green pepper, parsley | 2.4 | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, chemopreventive | [ |
| Madecassoside | −1.8 | Anti-inflammatory, skin hydrating | [ | |
| α-Mangostin | Mangosteen tree ( | 6 | Anti-proliferative, antioxidant, anticancer | [ |
| Melanin | Chestnut shell | −0.27 | Antioxidant | [ |
| Morin | Osage orange, guava, bilberry | 2.16 | Antioxidant, antihypertensive, neuroprotective, anti-inflam matory | [ |
| Naringenin | Grapefruit, bergamot, sour orange | 2.84 | Antioxidant, free radical scavenger, anti-inflammatory | [ |
| Oleuropein | Green olives, olive leaves, organ oil | 0.11 | Antioxidant, anticancer | [ |
| Oxyresveratrol | 0.83 | Antioxidant, potent tyrosinase inhibitor | [ | |
| Paeonol | Peonies (Paeonia suffruticosa) | 1.72 | Anti-inflammatory, anticancer | [ |
| Pheophorbide | Plants with chlorophyll | A 3.43, B 2.62 | Photosensitizer, therapeutic | [ |
| Rosmarinic acid | Rosemary, mint, sage, thyme, lemon balm | 3.00 | Antitumor, antimicrobial neuroprotective, osteiarthritis pain reduction | [ |
| Rutin | Citrus fruit | −0.87 | Preventive effect of blood clotting | [ |
| Salidroside | −0.58 | Antidepressant, anxiolytic | [ | |
| Sanguinarine | −0.94 | Antifungal, anticarcinogenic | [ | |
| Schisantherin A | 4.9 | Anti-parkinsonian, anti-inflammatory | [ | |
| Scutellarin | – | Antitumor | [ | |
| Shikonin | 2.12 | Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer | [ | |
| Sinigrin | Brassica vegetables | −3.2 | Anticancer, antibacterial, antioxidant | [ |
| β-sitosterol | Wheat germ, rice bran, flax seeds, peanuts, soybeans | 7.84 | Cholesterol-lowering | [ |
| Syringic acid | Ardisia elliptica | 1.01 | Antioxidant | [ |
| Tanshinone I | Herbs ( | 4.00 | Anticancer, neuroprotective | [ |
| Taxifolin | Wood (Siberian larch), cloudberry, macadamia nut | 1.82 | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cardiovascular, hepatoprotective | [ |
| Tetramethylpyrazine | Natto, fermented cocoa bean | 0.063 | Anti-inflammatory, antiplatelet | [ |
| Tetrandrine (Isotetrandrine) | Root of Radix stephania tetrandrae | 6.48 | Anti-inflammatory, anticancer | [ |
| Tyrosol | Wine, virgin olive oil | 1.19 | Antioxidant | [ |
| Zerumbone | Zingiber zerumbet Smith | 4.57 | Chemopreventive | [ |
log P was obtained from ChemAxon.