| Literature DB >> 35211268 |
Matthias Krumb1, Lisa Marie Kammer1, Shorouk O Badir1, María Jesús Cabrera-Afonso1, Victoria E Wu2, Minxue Huang2, Adam Csakai2, Lisa A Marcaurelle2, Gary A Molander1.
Abstract
DNA-encoded library (DEL) technology has emerged as a time- and cost-efficient technique for the identification of therapeutic candidates in the pharmaceutical industry. Although several reaction classes have been successfully validated in DEL environments, there remains a paucity of DNA-compatible reactions that harness building blocks (BBs) from readily available substructures bearing multifunctional handles for further library diversification under mild, dilute, and aqueous conditions. In this study, the direct C-H carbofunctionalization of medicinally-relevant heteroarenes can be accomplished via the photoreduction of DNA-conjugated (hetero)aryl halides to deliver reactive aryl radical intermediates in a regulated fashion within minutes of blue light illumination. A broad array of electron-rich and electron-poor heteroarene scaffolds undergo transformation in the presence of sensitive functional groups. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35211268 PMCID: PMC8790789 DOI: 10.1039/d1sc05683b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Scheme 1Schematic representation of DNA-encoded library construction and hit identification.
Scheme 2Medicinally relevant heteroarene scaffolds containing (hetero)arene C(sp2)–C(sp2) bonds (top). On-DNA heteroarylation protocols using palladium two-electron cross-coupling processes (middle). This strategy: direct photochemical C–H heteroarylation through the intermediacy of aryl radicals (bottom).
On-DNA photochemical heteroarylation of aryl halides: optimization of reaction conditions and control experimentsa
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Entry | Deviation from std conditions | % Conversion |
| 1 | None | 60 |
| 2 | Et3N | 56 |
| 3 | Hantzsch ester | 48 |
| 4 | DIPA | 41 |
| 5 | TMEDA | 43 |
| 6 | 1 equiv. DIPEA | 57 |
| 7 | 10 equiv. DIPEA | 51 |
| 8 | 20 equiv. DIPEA | 41 |
| 9 | 0.25 equiv. Ir(ppy)3 | 60 |
| 10 | 1.0 equiv. Ir(ppy)3 | 56 |
| 11 | 0.25 equiv. Ir(ppy)3 + 10 equiv. DIPEA | 53 |
| 12 | 0.10 equiv. Ir(ppy)3 + 15 equiv. DIPEA | 43 |
| 13 | No amine | 34 |
| 14 | No Ir(ppy)3 | 0 |
| 15 | No light | 0 |
Reaction conditions: DNA-conjugated aryl halide 1A (1.0 equiv., 25 nmol), methyl isoquinoline-3-carboxylate 2a (250 equiv., 6.25 μmol), Ir(ppy)3 (0.5 equiv., 12.5 nmol), DIPEA (5.0 equiv., 125 nmol), 3 : 1 DMSO/H2O (1.25 mM), 5 min irradiation with blue Kessil lamps (λmax = 456 nm, 40 W).
Conversion to 4a was determined by LC/MS analysis (see ESI).
Scheme 3Evaluation of heteroarene scope. Conversion was determined by LC/MS analysis (see ESI†). Reaction conditions: DNA-conjugated aryl halide (1.0 equiv., 25 nmol), heteroaryl subunit (250 equiv., 6.25 μmol), Ir(ppy)3 (0.5 equiv., 12.5 nmol), DIPEA (5.0 equiv., 125 nmol), 3 : 1 DMSO/H2O (1.3 mM), 5 min irradiation with blue Kessil lamps (λmax = 456 nm, 40 W). DNA-conjugated aryl halide derived from 4-chloro-3-iodo-benzoic acid (1B) was used. DNA-conjugated aryl halide derived from 2-bromoisonicotinic acid (1C) was used. Reaction was irradiated for 10 min.
Scheme 4Evaluation of DNA-conjugated (hetero)aryl halides and heteroarenes. Conversion was determined by LC/MS analysis (see ESI†). Reaction conditions: DNA-conjugated aryl halide (1.0 equiv., 25 nmol), heteroaryl subunit (250 equiv., 6.25 μmol), Ir(ppy)3 (0.5 equiv., 12.5 nmol), DIPEA (5.0 equiv., 125 nmol), 3 : 1 DMSO/H2O (1.3 mM), 5 min irradiation with blue Kessil lamps (λmax = 456 nm, 40 W).