Literature DB >> 28445455

Structural insight into allosteric modulation of protease-activated receptor 2.

Robert K Y Cheng1, Cédric Fiez-Vandal1, Oliver Schlenker1, Karl Edman2, Birte Aggeler3, Dean G Brown4, Giles A Brown1, Robert M Cooke1, Christoph E Dumelin5, Andrew S Doré1, Stefan Geschwindner2, Christoph Grebner6, Nils-Olov Hermansson2, Ali Jazayeri1, Patrik Johansson2, Louis Leong3, Rudi Prihandoko1, Mathieu Rappas1, Holly Soutter5, Arjan Snijder2, Linda Sundström2, Benjamin Tehan1, Peter Thornton7, Dawn Troast5, Giselle Wiggin1, Andrei Zhukov1, Fiona H Marshall1, Niek Dekker2.   

Abstract

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are a family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are irreversibly activated by proteolytic cleavage of the N terminus, which unmasks a tethered peptide ligand that binds and activates the transmembrane receptor domain, eliciting a cellular cascade in response to inflammatory signals and other stimuli. PARs are implicated in a wide range of diseases, such as cancer and inflammation. PARs have been the subject of major pharmaceutical research efforts but the discovery of small-molecule antagonists that effectively bind them has proved challenging. The only marketed drug targeting a PAR is vorapaxar, a selective antagonist of PAR1 used to prevent thrombosis. The structure of PAR1 in complex with vorapaxar has been reported previously. Despite sequence homology across the PAR isoforms, discovery of PAR2 antagonists has been less successful, although GB88 has been described as a weak antagonist. Here we report crystal structures of PAR2 in complex with two distinct antagonists and a blocking antibody. The antagonist AZ8838 binds in a fully occluded pocket near the extracellular surface. Functional and binding studies reveal that AZ8838 exhibits slow binding kinetics, which is an attractive feature for a PAR2 antagonist competing against a tethered ligand. Antagonist AZ3451 binds to a remote allosteric site outside the helical bundle. We propose that antagonist binding prevents structural rearrangements required for receptor activation and signalling. We also show that a blocking antibody antigen-binding fragment binds to the extracellular surface of PAR2, preventing access of the tethered ligand to the peptide-binding site. These structures provide a basis for the development of selective PAR2 antagonists for a range of therapeutic uses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28445455     DOI: 10.1038/nature22309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  26 in total

1.  Extracellular mutations of protease-activated receptor-1 result in differential activation by thrombin and thrombin receptor agonist peptide.

Authors:  B D Blackhart; L Ruslim-Litrus; C C Lu; V L Alves; W Teng; R M Scarborough; E E Reynolds; D Oksenberg
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  PELE:  Protein Energy Landscape Exploration. A Novel Monte Carlo Based Technique.

Authors:  Kenneth W Borrelli; Andreas Vitalis; Raul Alcantara; Victor Guallar
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 3.  Structure, function and pathophysiology of protease activated receptors.

Authors:  Mark N Adams; Rithwik Ramachandran; Mei-Kwan Yau; Jacky Y Suen; David P Fairlie; Morley D Hollenberg; John D Hooper
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Crystal Structure of Antagonist Bound Human Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1.

Authors:  Jill E Chrencik; Christopher B Roth; Masahiko Terakado; Haruto Kurata; Rie Omi; Yasuyuki Kihara; Dora Warshaviak; Shinji Nakade; Guillermo Asmar-Rovira; Mauro Mileni; Hirotaka Mizuno; Mark T Griffith; Caroline Rodgers; Gye Won Han; Jeffrey Velasquez; Jerold Chun; Raymond C Stevens; Michael A Hanson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Features and development of Coot.

Authors:  P Emsley; B Lohkamp; W G Scott; K Cowtan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

6.  How good are my data and what is the resolution?

Authors:  Philip R Evans; Garib N Murshudov
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2013-06-13

7.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21

8.  High-resolution crystal structure of human protease-activated receptor 1.

Authors:  Cheng Zhang; Yoga Srinivasan; Daniel H Arlow; Juan Jose Fung; Daniel Palmer; Yaowu Zheng; Hillary F Green; Anjali Pandey; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw; William I Weis; Shaun R Coughlin; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard.

Authors:  Thomas C Terwilliger; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Pavel V Afonine; Nigel W Moriarty; Peter H Zwart; Li Wei Hung; Randy J Read; Paul D Adams
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2007-12-05

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  63 in total

1.  Discovery of Novel Nonpeptidic PAR2 Ligands.

Authors:  Ilona Klösel; Maximilian F Schmidt; Jonas Kaindl; Harald Hübner; Dorothee Weikert; Peter Gmeiner
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 2.  G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Asthma Therapy: Pharmacology and Drug Action.

Authors:  Stacy Gelhaus Wendell; Hao Fan; Cheng Zhang
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Structure of the complement C5a receptor bound to the extra-helical antagonist NDT9513727.

Authors:  Nathan Robertson; Mathieu Rappas; Andrew S Doré; Jason Brown; Giovanni Bottegoni; Markus Koglin; Julie Cansfield; Ali Jazayeri; Robert M Cooke; Fiona H Marshall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Understanding Peptide Binding in Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors.

Authors:  Irina G Tikhonova; Veronique Gigoux; Daniel Fourmy
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Does the Lipid Bilayer Orchestrate Access and Binding of Ligands to Transmembrane Orthosteric/Allosteric Sites of G Protein-Coupled Receptors?

Authors:  Christopher T Szlenk; Jeevan B Gc; Senthil Natesan
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Molecular binding mode of PF-232798, a clinical anti-HIV candidate, at chemokine receptor CCR5.

Authors:  Ya Zhu; Yan-Long Zhao; Jian Li; Hong Liu; Qiang Zhao; Bei-Li Wu; Zhen-Lin Yang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  Nucleic Acid-Barcoding Technologies: Converting DNA Sequencing into a Broad-Spectrum Molecular Counter.

Authors:  Glen Liszczak; Tom W Muir
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  A benchmark study of loop modeling methods applied to G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Lee H Wink; Daniel L Baker; Judith A Cole; Abby L Parrill
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Ligand binding at the protein-lipid interface: strategic considerations for drug design.

Authors:  Jian Payandeh; Matthew Volgraf
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  Myeloid cell-synthesized coagulation factor X dampens antitumor immunity.

Authors:  Claudine Graf; Petra Wilgenbus; Sven Pagel; Jennifer Pott; Federico Marini; Sabine Reyda; Maki Kitano; Stephan Macher-Göppinger; Hartmut Weiler; Wolfram Ruf
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2019-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.