| Literature DB >> 34677431 |
Ramanathan Srinivasan1,2, Arunachalam Kannappan3, Chunlei Shi3, Xiangmin Lin1,2,4.
Abstract
The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance reduces the effectiveness of antimicrobial drugs in preventing and treating infectious diseases caused by pathogenic organisms, such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Because of the burgeoning growth of microbes with antimicrobial-resistant traits, there is a dire need to identify and develop novel and effective antimicrobial agents to treat infections from antimicrobial-resistant strains. The marine environment is rich in ecological biodiversity and can be regarded as an untapped resource for prospecting novel bioactive compounds. Therefore, exploring the marine environment for antimicrobial agents plays a significant role in drug development and biomedical research. Several earlier scientific investigations have proven that bacterial diversity in the marine environment represents an emerging source of structurally unique and novel antimicrobial agents. There are several reports on marine bacterial secondary metabolites, and many are pharmacologically significant and have enormous promise for developing effective antimicrobial drugs to combat microbial infections in drug-resistant pathogens. In this review, we attempt to summarize published articles from the last twenty-five years (1996-2020) on antimicrobial secondary metabolites from marine bacteria evolved in marine environments, such as marine sediment, water, fauna, and flora.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial; antifungal; antimicrobial; antiviral; marine bacteria; marine fauna; marine flora; marine sediments; marine water; secondary metabolites
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34677431 PMCID: PMC8539464 DOI: 10.3390/md19100530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Antimicrobial activity was reported from the main marine bacterial phyla. (A) Categorization of articles published between the years 1996–2020, according to bacterial phylum, using the keywords “marine phylum” [‘marine Actinobacteria’, ‘marine Bacteriodetes’, ‘marine Cyanobacteria’, ‘marine Firmicutes’, ‘marine Planctomycetes’, and ‘marine Proteobacteria’], and “antimicrobial activity”. Source: PubMed database (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 July 2021). (B) The pie chart shows the percentage of scholarly articles related to major marine bacterial phyla that have been published for their antimicrobial potentials in the last twenty-five-year study period.
Figure 2Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 1–4 derived from marine Actinobacteria.
Figure 3Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 5 and 6 derived from marine Cyanobacteria.
Figure 4Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 7 and 8 derived from marine Firmicutes.
Figure 5Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 9 and 10 derived from marine Proteobacteria.
Figure 6Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 11–13 from sediment-derived marine bacteria.
Figure 7Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 14–17 from sediment-derived marine bacteria.
Figure 8Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 18–23 from sediment-derived marine bacteria.
Figure 9Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 24–26 from sediment-derived marine bacteria.
Figure 10Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 27–30 from water-derived marine bacteria.
Antimicrobial potential of marine bacteria derived from marine sediments/water.
| S. | Marine Source | Marine Bacteria | Secondary Metabolite(s) | Antimicrobial Activity | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sediment sample | Sealutomicin A | Inhibited the growth of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae | [ | |
| 2 | Sediment sample | - | Exhibited antifungal activity against | [ | |
| 3 | Sediment sample | Tetradecanoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, and n-hexadecanoic acid | Exhibited antifungal activity against | [ | |
| 4 | Sediment sample | Streptothiazolidine A | Exhibited antifungal activity against | [ | |
| 5 | Sediment sample | Anteiso-C15 Ile2,7 surfactin, 1 | Inhibited the appressoria formation of rice blast fungal pathogen | [ | |
| 6 | Sediment sample | Chitinase | Showed antifungal activity against | [ | |
| 7 | Sediment sample | Different fatty acids and lipid compounds | Exhibited both antibacterial and antifungal activities | [ | |
| 8 | Sediment sample | 4-bromophenol and bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | Showed antibacterial activity against several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ | |
| 9 | Sediment sample |
| 3-hydroxy- | Inhibited the growth of | [ |
| 10 | Estuary soil sample |
| Polyketide compounds | Exhibited antibacterial activity against | [ |
| 11 | Sediment sample |
| Salinaphthoquinones | Exhibited moderate antibacterial activity against | [ |
| 12 | Sediment sample | Meroterpenoids | Showed intense antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| 13 | Sediment sample | Terrosamycins A and B | Exhibited strong antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria | [ | |
| 14 | Sediment sample | - | Exhibited antifungal activity against | [ | |
| 15 | Sediment sample | Mycenolide A | Inhibited the growth of | [ | |
| 16 | Sediment sample | Tunicamycin derivatives | Showed both antibacterial and antifungal activities | [ | |
| 17 | Sediment sample | - | Exhibited antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| 18 | Sediment sample | Actinobacteria SJP4 | [1,2,4]triazol-1-ylethanone | Exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ |
| 19 | Sediment sample | - | Showed both antibacterial and antifungal activities | [ | |
| 20 | Sediment sample | N-acetylborrelidin B | Exhibited both antibacterial and antifungal activities | [ | |
| 21 | Mangrove sediment sample |
| - | Exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ |
| 22 | Mangrove sediment sample | Actinobacteria | Extracellular enzymes | Exhibited both antibacterial and antifungal activities | [ |
| 23 | Sediment sample | Peptidic compounds | Showed antifungal activity against | [ | |
| 24 | Sediment sample | Diketopiperazines | Inhibited the growth of | [ | |
| 25 | Sediment sample | Different bioactive compounds | Inhibited growth of both bacterial and fungal pathogens | [ | |
| 26 | Mangrove sediment sample | Different bioactive compounds | Exhibited both antibacterial and antifungal activities | [ | |
| 27 | Sediment sample | Isoprenoid quinones | Exhibited strong antagonistic activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ | |
| 28 | Sediment sample | Mollemycin A | Exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ | |
| 29 | Sediment sample | Sonorensin | Exhibited broad spectrum of antibacterial activity against different bacterial pathogens | [ | |
| 30 | Sediment sample | Iodinin | Exhibited both antibacterial and antifungal activities | [ | |
| 31 | Sediment sample | Lobophorin I | Exhibited antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| 32 | Sediment sample | Neomaclafungins | Showed strong antifungal activity against | [ | |
| 33 | Sediment sample | Pseudonocardians A–C | Exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ | |
| 34 | Sediment sample | Caboxamycin | Exhibited antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacterial pathogens | [ | |
| 35 | Sediment sample | - | Exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ | |
| 36 | Sediment sample | Bonactin | Exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ | |
| 37 | Sediment sample | Neoabyssomicins | Exhibited antiviral activity against HSV and vesicular stomatitis virus | [ | |
| 38 | Sediment sample | Xiamycin C | Exhibited strong antiviral activity against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus | [ | |
| 39 | Water sample |
| 9, 10-dihydrophenanthrene-2-carboxylic acid | Revealed strong antifungal activity against | [ |
| 40 | Water sample | - | Exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ | |
| 41 | Water sample | Methylamine | Inhibited the growth of | [ | |
| 42 | Estuarine water sample | Different strains of heterotrophic bacteria | - | Inhibited the growth of | [ |
Figure 11Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 31–34 derived from bacteria associated with marine sponges.
Figure 12Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 35–37 derived from bacteria associated with marine sponges.
Figure 13Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 38–42 derived from bacteria associated with marine corals and mollusks.
Antimicrobial potential of bacteria associated with different marine fauna.
| S. | Marine Fauna | Associated Marine Bacteria | Secondary Metabolite(s) | Antimicrobial Activity | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sponges | - | Exhibited antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| 2 | Sponges | Different | Macrolactin A and C14-surfactin | Inhibited the growth of | [ |
| 3 | Sponge ( | Fosfomycin and amifloxacin | Exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ | |
| 4 | Sponges (Demospongiae and Homoscleromorpha) | Genera | - | Inhibited the growth of different multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens | [ |
| 5 | Sponge ( | Diversity of heterotrophic bacteria | - | Exhibited antibacterial activity against | [ |
| 6 | Sponge ( | Volatile organic compounds | Inhibited growth of | [ | |
| 7 | Coral | Lobophorin K | Exhibited antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| 8 | Coral | Heat tolerant cell-free culture supernatant | Inhibited the growth of | [ | |
| 9 | Coral ( | Three different bacterial phyla ( | - | Exhibited both antibacterial and antifungal activities | [ |
| 10 | Mollusk | Cyclolipopeptides | Inhibited the growth of Gram-negative human bacterial pathogens | [ | |
| 11 | Mollusk | Julichrome Monomers | Inhibited the growth of | [ | |
| 12 | Mollusk | Borrelidins | Exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens | [ | |
| 13 | Mollusk ( | Mindapyrroles A–C | Showed antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria | [ | |
| 14 | Mollusk ( | Bacicyclin | Inhibited the growth of clinical pathogens | [ | |
| 15 | Mollusk ( | Lobophorins | Inhibited the growth of | [ | |
| 16 | Mollusk ( | Saccharothrixmicines A and B | Exhibited antifungal activity against | [ | |
| 17 | Mollusk ( | Cyclic depsipeptides | Exhibited broad spectrum antibacterial activity | [ | |
| 18 | Mollusk ( | Bacterial strains CF-20 and C-148 | dd-diketopiperazines | Exhibited antibacterial activity against | [ |
Figure 14Structural representation of antimicrobial compounds 43–46 derived from bacteria associated with marine seaweeds.
Antimicrobial potential of bacteria associated with different marine flora.
| S. | Marine Flora | Associated Marine Bacteria | Secondary Metabolite(s) | Antimicrobial Activity | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seaweed | Lupenol, diazene, and furan | Inhibited the growth of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens | [ | |
| 2 | Seaweed ( | - | Showed antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| 3 | Seaweeds | Phyla of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes | 2-Pyrrolidinone, Phenol, 2, 4-bis (1, 1-dimethylethyl) and Furan derivatives | Exhibited antibacterial activity against clinical pathogens | [ |
| 4 | Seaweed ( | Desertomycin G | Showed antibacterial activity against a broad range of Gram-positive bacterial pathogens | [ | |
| 5 | Seaweed ( | Aryl-crowned polyketides | Exhibited antibacterial activity against different Gram-negative bacterial pathogens | [ | |
| 6 | Seaweed ( | Kocumarin | Inhibited the growth of both bacterial and fungal pathogens | [ | |
| 7 | Seaweed ( |
| Polyketides | Exhibited antibacterial activity against | [ |
| 8 | Seaweed ( | Polyketide furanoterpenoids | Exhibited antibacterial activity against perceptive food pathogens | [ | |
| 9 | Seaweed | O-heterocyclic polyketide derivatives | Showed potent antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| 10 | Seaweed |
| Polyketides | Inhibited the growth of food-borne pathogens | [ |
| 11 | Seaweed (Rhodophyceae and Phaeophyceae) | Phyla of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria | Polyketides | Prevented the growth of fouling bacteria | [ |
| 12 | Seaweed ( | - | Exhibited both antibacterial and antifungal activities | [ | |
| 13 | Seaweed ( | 7-O-methyl-5′-hydroxy-3′-heptenoate-macrolactin | Exhibited antibacterial activity against human opportunistic clinical pathogens | [ | |
| 14 | Seaweed |
| YbdN protein | Inhibited the growth of | [ |
| 15 | Seagrasses (Cymodocea sp., | - | Inhibited the growth of | [ | |
| 16 | Seagrasses ( | Different endo and epiphytic bacteria | - | Inhibited the growth of different human bacterial pathogens | [ |
| 17 | Mangrove ( | Sterol-glycosides | Exhibited antibacterial activity against aquatic bacterial pathogens | [ | |
| 18 | Mangroves (Seven different) | Belongs to the phylum Gammaproteobacteria | - | Showed antifungal activity against fungal pathogens | [ |
| 19 | Mangrove ( |
| Vibriocin | Used in the management of controlling the vibrio infections | [ |
Figure 15Statistical publication list from top ten countries engaged in studying marine bacteria for their antimicrobial activities. The data were retrieved from the PubMed database (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 July 2021) by providing the keywords “marine bacteria” and “antimicrobial activity” for the study period (1996–2020).