Literature DB >> 26006713

Molecular architecture and biomedical leads of terpenes from red sea marine invertebrates.

Mohamed Elamir F Hegazy1, Tarik A Mohamed2, Montaser A Alhammady3, Alaa M Shaheen4, Eman H Reda5, Abdelsamed I Elshamy6, Mina Aziz7, Paul W Paré8.   

Abstract

Marine invertebrates including sponges, soft coral, tunicates, mollusks and bryozoan have proved to be a prolific source of bioactive natural products. Among marine-derived metabolites, terpenoids have provided a vast array of molecular architectures. These isoprenoid-derived metabolites also exhibit highly specialized biological activities ranging from nerve regeneration to blood-sugar regulation. As a result, intense research activity has been devoted to characterizing invertebrate terpenes from both a chemical and biological standpoint. This review focuses on the chemistry and biology of terpene metabolites isolated from the Red Sea ecosystem, a unique marine biome with one of the highest levels of biodiversity and specifically rich in invertebrate species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Red Sea; biomedical leads; marine ecosystem; marine invertebrates; terpenes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26006713      PMCID: PMC4446624          DOI: 10.3390/md13053154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Drugs        ISSN: 1660-3397            Impact factor:   5.118


1. Red Sea Ecosystem

Marine ecosystems cover nearly 70% of the earth’s surface, averaging almost 4 km in depth and are proposed to contain over 80% of the world’s plant and animal species [1]. Exact marine biodiversity is less certain since between one-third and two-thirds of marine organisms have yet to be described [2]. Worldwide there are approximately 226,000 marine eukaryotes currently reported, while close to a million total species are estimated, based on calculations by marine biologists using statistical predictions [2]. Considering that constituents from higher plants along with metabolites from terrestrial microorganisms have provided a substantial fraction of the natural-product-derived drugs currently used in Western medicine [3], the potential to vastly expand the number and diversity of natural products by mining marine eukaryotes as well as associated prokaryotes from the richly diverse Red Sea ecosystem seems attainable. In fact, just within the past quarter century, the search for new marine metabolites has resulted in the isolation of upward of 10,000 compounds [4], many of which exhibit biological activity. Despite the fact that marine biodiversity far exceeds that of terrestrial ecosystems, research of marine natural products as pharmaceutical agents, is still in its infancy. Factors that contribute to the gap between terrestrial and marine derived natural products include a paucity of ethno-medical history from marine sources as well as impediments associated with collecting, identifying and chemical analysis of marine materials [5]. Notwithstanding, a combination of new diving techniques and implementation of remotely operated pods over the last decade has facilitated the characterization of marine-derived metabolites. This review encompasses secondary metabolites derived from marine invertebrates, a largely diverse group of fixed or sessile organisms, many in a stationary form although some are capable of slow primitive movement. While invertebrates lack physical defences such as a protective shell or spines, they are often rich in defence metabolites that can be utilized to attack prey or defend a habitat. This review focused on a class of secondary defence metabolites abundant in marine invertebrates, five-carbon isoprenoid-derived terpenes. Extensive speciation from microorganisms to mammals can be attributed, at least in part to a wide range of temperatures (0 to 35 °C in arctic waters versus hydrothermal vents, respectively), pressures (1–1000 atm.), nutrient availabilities (oligotrophic to eutrophic) and lighting conditions that exist in this marine biome [6]. The analysis will be limited to the Red Sea which is considered an epicenter for marine biodiversity with an extremely high endemic biota including over 50 genera of hermatypic coral. Indeed soft coral (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Octocorallia), which are an important structural component of coral reef communities [7,8], are approximately 40% native to the Red Sea [6]. The Red Sea, in which extensive reef formation occurs, is arguably the world’s warmest (up to 35 °C in summer) and most saline habitat (ca. 40 psu in the northern Red Sea) [6]. Despite the Red Sea’s size and diversity of reef-associated inhabitants (for examples, see Figure 1), marine invertebrates in this ecosystem remain poorly studied compared to other large coral reef systems around the world such as the Great Barrier Reef or the Caribbean. This review will cover terpenes isolated from marine invertebrates of the Red Sea (Figure 2) as well as identified biological activities for compounds reported during the time period from 1980 to 2014.
Figure 1

Samples of marine invertebrate diversity from the Red Sea including (from left to right starting at the top left corner) Sarcophyton glaucum, S. regulare, S. ehrenbergi, Nephthea molle, Acropora humilis, Porites solida, Pocillopora verrucosa, Clothraria rubrinoidis and Cystoseira trinode. Marine species exhibit greater phyta diversity than land species.

Figure 2

Terpene skeletal types including ylangene (A), aromadendrane (B), tricycle-[6,7,5]-sesquiterpene (C), cembrane (D), xeniolide and xeniaphyllane (E), eunicellin diterpene (F), sesterterpene (G), norsesterterpene (H), triterpene (I) and steroid (J) types.

Samples of marine invertebrate diversity from the Red Sea including (from left to right starting at the top left corner) Sarcophyton glaucum, S. regulare, S. ehrenbergi, Nephthea molle, Acropora humilis, Porites solida, Pocillopora verrucosa, Clothraria rubrinoidis and Cystoseira trinode. Marine species exhibit greater phyta diversity than land species. Terpene skeletal types including ylangene (A), aromadendrane (B), tricycle-[6,7,5]-sesquiterpene (C), cembrane (D), xeniolide and xeniaphyllane (E), eunicellin diterpene (F), sesterterpene (G), norsesterterpene (H), triterpene (I) and steroid (J) types.

2. Sesquiterpenes

Sesquiterpenes are secondary metabolites present in many marine organisms including soft coral (e.g., Dendronephthya sp., Sinularia gardineri, Litophyton arboreum, Sarcophyton trocheliophorum, S. glaucum and Parerythropodium fulvum fulvum) [9,10,11,12,13,14], and sponges (e.g., Hyrtios sp. and Diacarnus erythraenus) [15,16].

2.1. Ylangene-Type Sesquiterpenes

Tricyclo-[4,6,6]-sesquiterpenes, Dendronephthol A–C (1–3) have been isolated from the soft coral Dendronephthya, family Nephtheidae (Figure 3). Cytotoxic activity was observed for 1 and 3 against the murine lymphoma L5187Y cancer cell line with ED50 values of 8.4 and 6.8 μg/mL, respectively [9].
Figure 3

Representative structures of ylangene-type sesquiterpenes (1–3).

Representative structures of ylangene-type sesquiterpenes (1–3).

2.2. Aromadendrane-Type Sesquiterpenes

Bicyclico [5,7] sesquiterpenes have been isolated from several different coral with examples shown in Table 1 and Figure 4. Cytotoxicity to murine leukemia (P-388), human lung carcinoma (A-549), human colon carcinoma (HT-29), and human melanoma cells (MEL-28) [11] was observed with exposure to 4. Inhibitory activity against HIV-1 protease (PR) at an IC50 of 7 μM was observed for 5. Compounds 5 and 8 demonstrated cytostatic action with assaying HeLa cells, revealing potential use in virostatic cocktails [11]. Antitumor activity against lymphoma and Ehrlich cell lines was observed for 9 with LD50 in the range of 2.5–3.8 μM; antibacterial and antifungal activities were also observed [12]. Compound 10 showed potent activity against the prostate cancer line PC-3 with an IC50 of 9.3 ± 0.2 μM. Anti-proliferative activity of 9 can be attributed, at least in part, to its ability to induce cellular apoptosis [13]. Compound 12 exhibited a promising IC50 > 1 μg/mL against three cancer cell lines including murine leukemia (P-388; ATCC: CCL-46), human lung carcinoma (A-549; ATCC: CCL-8) and human colon carcinoma (HT-29; ATCC: HTB-38) [15].
Table 1

Aromadendrane sesquiterpenes, sources and activities.

No.NameSourcesActivities
4Guaianediol [10]Sinularia gardinerianti-tumor
5Alismol [11]Litophyton arboreumcytostatic
6Lactiflorenol [17]Sinularia polydactyla
710-O-Methyl alismoxide [11]L. arboreum
8Alismoxide [11]L. arboreumcytostatic
9Palustrol [12]Sarcophyton trocheliophorumanti-tumor, antibacterial and antifungal
1010(14)-Aromadendrene [13]Sarcophyton glaucumanti-tumor, antiproliferative
11Fulfulvene [14]Parerythropodium fulvum fulvum
12O-Methyl guaianediol [15]Diacarnus erythraenuscytotoxic
Figure 4

Representative structures of aromadendrane-type sesquiterpenes (4–12).

Aromadendrane sesquiterpenes, sources and activities. Representative structures of aromadendrane-type sesquiterpenes (4–12).

2.3. γ-Methoxybutenolide-Type Sesquiterpenes

Tricyclo-[6,7,5]-sesquiterpenes, Hyrtiosenolide A and B have been isolated from the sponge Hyrtios sp., and compounds 13 and 14 exhibit weak antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli [16] (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Structures of sesquiterpenes-γ-methoxybutenolides and sesquiterpene derivatives (13–28).

2.4. Miscellaneous Sesquiterpenes

Additional sesquiterpenes have been isolated from several coral genera with examples reported in Table 2 and Figure 5. Compound 28 exhibits cytotoxic activity against human hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) and breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) [17].
Table 2

Other sesquiterpenes, sources and activities.

No.NameSourcesActivities
155-Hydroxy-8-methoxy-calamenene [14]Parerythropodium fulvum fulvum
165-Hydroxy-8-methoxy-calamenene-6-al [14]Parerythropodium fulvum fulvum
17Peyssonol A [17]Peyssonnelia sp.
18Ilimaquinone [18]Smenospongia sp.
19Avarol [18,19]Dysidea cinereaHIV
203′-Hydroxyavarone [20]D.cinerea
213′,6′-Dihydroxyavarone [20]D.cinerea
226′-Acetoxyavarone [20]D.cinerea
236′- Hydroxy4′-methoxyavarone [20]D.cinerea
246′-Hydroxyavarol [20]D.cinerea
256′-Acetoxyavarol [20]D.cinerea
26Smenotronic acid [18]Smenospongia sp.
27Dactyltronic acids [18]Smenospongia sp.
28(E)-Methyl-3-(5-butyl-1-hydroxy-2,3-dimethyl-4-oxocyclopent-2-enyl)acrylate [21]Sarcophyton ehrenbergicytotoxic (HepG2) (anti-tumor)
Other sesquiterpenes, sources and activities. Structures of sesquiterpenes-γ-methoxybutenolides and sesquiterpene derivatives (13–28).

3. Diterpenes

Diterpenoids are widespread in various marine organisms including soft coral (Sarcophyton glaucum, S. trocheliophorum, Sinularia polydactyla, S. gardineri, Litophyton arboreum, Lobophyton sp., Xenia sp. and Cladiella pachyclados) [10,11,12,13,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], and sponges (Leucetta chagosensis) [23].

3.1. Cembrane-Based Diterpenes

Fourteen-membered cyclic and bicycle-[5,14]-diterpenes have been isolated from numerous coral genera with examples shown in Table 3 and Figure 6. Compounds 29, 41 and 42 exhibited antibacterial and antifungal activity against Aspergillus flavus and Candida albicans with low μM MIC values [12]. Lack of cytotoxicity against monkey kidney CV-1 cells suggests that 30, 32, and 33 may prove to be good candidate drugs against melanoma and warrant further studies in the development as antitumor agents [19]. Compound 30 exhibits moderate antifungal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans with an IC50 of 20 μg/mL [22]. Compound 43 showed selective cytotoxicity against HepG2 (IC50 1.0 μg/mL) [24]. Compounds 44 and 45 were found to be inhibitors of cytochrome P450 1A activity [25]. Compound 47 exhibits cytotoxic activity against HepG2, HCT-116, and HeLa cells with low IC50 μg/mL values [26]. Cytotoxic activity against human hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) and breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cell lines was observed for 48 and 49 [21].
Table 3

Cembrane diterpenes, sources and activities.

No.NameSourceActivity
29Cembrene-C [12]Sarcophyton trocheliophorumanti-fungal, anti-bacterial
30Sarcophine [19,22]S. glaucumanti-tumor, antifungal
31(+)-7α,8β-Dihydroxydeepoxy-sarcophine [22]S. glaucum
32Sarcophytolide 1 [19,30]S. glaucumanti-tumor
33(1S,2E,4R,7E,11E,13S)-Cembratrien-4,13-diol [22]S. glaucumanti-tumor
34(1S,2E,4R,6E,8R,11S,12R)-8,12-Epoxy-2,6-cembradiene-4,11-diol [22]S. glaucumanti-tumor
35(1S,2E,4R,6E,8S,11R,12S)-8,11-Epoxy-4,12-epoxy-2,6-cembradiene [22]S. glaucumanti-tumor
36Trochelioid A [23]S. trocheliophorum
37Trochelioid B [23]S. trocheliophorum
3816-Oxosarcophytonin E [23]S. trocheliophorum
39ent-Sarcophine [23]S. trocheliophorum
408-epi-Sarcophinone [23]S. trocheliophorum
41Sarcotrocheliol acetate [12]S. trocheliophorumanti-tumor
42Sarcotrocheliol [12]S. trocheliophorumanti-tumor
43Durumolide C [24]Sinularia polydactylaanti-fungal, anti-bacterial
4411(S)-Hydroperoxylsarcoph-12(20)-ene [22]S. glaucumanti-fungal, anti-bacterial
4512(S)-Hydroperoxylsarcoph-10-ene [25]S. glaucumcytotoxic HepG2 (anti-tumor)
46(2R,7R,8R)-Dihydroxy-deepoxysarcophine [26]S. glaucumanti-tumor
477β-Acetoxy-8α-hydroxy-deepoxysarcophine [26]S. glaucumcytotoxic (HepG2)( anti-tumor)
487-Keto-8α-hydroxy-deepoxysarcophine [21]S. ehrenbergicytotoxic (HepG2) (anti-tumor)
497β-Chloro-8α-hydroxy-12-acetoxy-deepoxysarcophine [21]S. ehrenbergicytotoxic (HepG2) (anti-tumor)
50Nephthenol [27]Lobophytum pauciflorum
51Cembrene-A [27]Alcyonium utinomii
52Alcyonol A [27]A. utinomii
53Alcyonol B [27]A. utinomii
54Alcyonol C [27]A. utinomii
55Pauciflorol A [27]L. pauciflorum
56Pauciflorol B [27]L. pauciflorum
57Thunbergol [27]L. pauciflorum
58Labolide [27]L. crassum
5920-Acetylsinularolide B [27]L. crassum
6020-Acetylsinularolide C [27]L. crassum
61Sinularolide C [27]L. crassum
62Sinularolide C diacetate [27]L. crassum
633-Deoxypresinularolide B [27]L. crassum
643-Deoxy-20-acetylpresinularolide B [27]L. crassum
65Sarcophytol M [11]Litophyton arboreum
66Sarcophytolol [13]Sarcophyton glaucumcytotoxic HepG2 (anti-tumor) antiproliferative
67Sarcophytolide B [13]S. glaucum
68Sarcophytolide C [13]S. glaucum
69Deoxosarcophine [13]S. glaucumcytotoxic against MCF-7 (anti-tumor)
702-epi-Sarcophine [31]S. auritumcytotoxic
71(1R,2E,4S,6E,8R,11R,12R)-2,6-cembradiene-4,8,11,12-tetrol [31]S. auritumcytotoxic
72Singardin [31]Sinularia gardinerianti-tumor
Figure 6

Structures of cembrane-based diterpenes (29–72).

Compounds 66 and 68 have significant cytotoxic activity against the human hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line HepG2 with an IC50 of 20 μM while 67 and 68 show activity against the human breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF-7, also with an IC50 in the low μM range. The anti-proliferative activity of 66 and 68 can be attributed, at least in part, to observed cellular apoptosis activity [13,30]. Compound 70 exhibits cytotoxicity to a variety of cell lines including murine leukemia (P-388), human lung carcinoma (A-549), human colon carcinoma (HT-29) and human melanoma (MEL-28) [31]. Cembrane diterpenes, sources and activities. Structures of cembrane-based diterpenes (29–72).

3.2. Xenicane Diterpenes

Bicyclo-[6,9]/[4,9]-diterpenes have been isolated from the coral genus Xenia with examples shown in Table 4 and Figure 7.
Table 4

Xenia diterpenes, sources and activities.

No.NameSource
73Xenicin [28]Xenia macrosoiculata
74Xenialactol-D [28]X. obscuronata
75Xenialactol-C [28]X. obscuronata
76Xeniolide-E [28]X. obscuronata
7714(15)-Epoxyxeniaphyllene [28]X. lilielae
78Xeniaphyllene-dioxide [28]X. lilielae
79Xeniaphyllenol-C [28]X. macrosoiculata
80Epoxyxeniaphyllenol-A [28]X. lilielae, X. macrosoiculata
81l4,15-Xeniaphyllandiol-4,5-epoxide [28]X. macrosoiculata
82Xeniaphyllenol-B [28]X. macrosoiculata
Figure 7

The structures of Xenicane diterpenes (73–82).

Xenia diterpenes, sources and activities. The structures of Xenicane diterpenes (73–82).

3.3. Eunicellin-Based Diterpenes

Tricyclo-[6,5,10]-diterpenes have been isolated from the soft coral genus Cladiella with examples shown in Table 5 and Figure 8. Eunicellin-based diterpenes display a wide range of bioactivities including anti-inflammatory and antitumor activities [26]. Compounds 83–104 have been evaluated for activity to inhibit growth, proliferation, invasion and migration of a prostate cancer cell line with potent anti-migratory and anti-invasive activities observed. Compounds with exomethylene functionalities at C-7 and C-11 demonstrate low anti-migratory activity, however replacement of the exomethylene moiety at C-7 with a quaternary oxygenated carbon, appreciatively increases the activity, as observed for compounds 93–94 and 96 [29].
Table 5

Eunicellin diterpenoids, sources and activities.

No.NameSourceActivity
83Pachycladin A [29]Cladiella pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
84Klysimplexin G [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
85Pachycladin B [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
86Klysimplexin E [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
87Pachycladin C [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
88Cladiellisin [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
893-Acetyl cladiellisin [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
903,6-Diacetyl cladiellisin [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
91Pachycladin D [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
92Pachycladin E [26]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
93Sclerophytin A [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
94Sclerophytin F methyl ether [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
95Sclerophytin B [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
96(+)-Polyanthelin A [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
97Cladiella-6Z,11(17)-dien-3-ol [29]C. pachycladosanti-tumor, anti-invasive
98Briarein A [32]Junceella juncea
99Juncins A [32]J. juncea
100Juncins B [32]J. juncea
101Juncins C [32]J. juncea
102Juncins D [32]J. juncea
103Juncins E [32]J. juncea
104Juncins [32]J. juncea
Figure 8

The structure of eunicellin-type diterpenes (83–104).

3.4. Miscellaneous Diterpenes

Miscellaneous diterpenes were isolated from three different genus Xenia, Chelonaplysilla and Dysidea. These compounds were classified as: prenylated germacrenes (105), bicyclic diterpenes (108, 109), clerodane diterpenes (107), carbo-tricyclic diterpenes (108) and re-arranged spongian diterpenes (110–113) as shown in Table 6 and Figure 9.
Table 6

Macrocyclic diterpenes, sources and activities.

No.NameSource
105Obscuronatin [28]Xenia obscuronata
106Biflora-4,10(19),15-triene [28,33]X. obscuronata
107Chelodane [34]Chelonaplysilla erecta
108Barekoxide [34]C. erecta
109Zaatirin [34]C. erecta
110Norrisolide [35]Dysidea sp.
111Norrlandin [35]Dysidea sp.
112Seco-norrlandin B [35]Dysidea sp.
113Seco-norrlandin C [35]Dysidea sp.
Figure 9

The structure of the macrocyclic type diterpenes (105–113).

Eunicellin diterpenoids, sources and activities. The structure of eunicellin-type diterpenes (83–104). Macrocyclic diterpenes, sources and activities. The structure of the macrocyclic type diterpenes (105–113).

4. Sesterterpenes and Norsesterterpenes

4.1. Sesterterpenes

Pentacyclo-[6,6,6,6,5]-sesterterpenes have been isolated from two different sponges with examples shown in Table 7 and Figure 10. Compound 116 exhibits antimycobacterial inhibition against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Rv) at a concentration of 6 μg/mL while 117–119 displayed moderate to weak inhibitory activity [36]. Compounds 122–123 showed significant cytotoxicity against murine leukemia (P-388), human lung carcinoma (A-549) and a human colon carcinoma (HT-29) [37].
Table 7

Sesterterpenes, sources and activities.

No.NameSourceActivity
114Scalardysin [18]Dysidea herbacea
11525-Dehydroxy-12- epi-deacetylscalarin [36]Hyrtios erectaantimycobacterial
116Sesterstatin [36]H. erectaantimycobacterial
11716-epi-Scalarolbutenolide [36]H. erectaantimycobacterial
1183-Acetylsesterstatin [36]H. erectaantimycobacterial
119Salmahyrtisol A [37]H. erecta
120Hyrtiosal [37]H. erecta
121Salmahyrtisol B [37]H. erectacytotoxic (anti-tumor)
12219-Acetyl sesterstatin [37]H. erectacytotoxic (anti-tumor)
123Scalarolide [37]H. erecta
124Salmahyrtisol C [37]H. erecta
12516-Hydroxyscalarolide [38]H. erectaCytotoxic, antimycobacterial
12612-O-Deacetyl-12-epi-scalarine [38]H. erectaCytotoxic, antimycobacterial
127(−)-Wistarin [39]Ircinia wistarii
128(+)-Wistarin [39]I. wistarii
129(−)-Ircinianin [39]I. wistarii
130Bilosespens A [40]Dysidea cinereaCytotoxic
131Bilosespens A [40]D. cinereaCytotoxic
Figure 10

Structures of sesterterpenes (114–131).

Sesterterpenes, sources and activities. Structures of sesterterpenes (114–131).

4.2. Norsesterterpenes

Norsesterterpenes have been isolated from the sponge species Diacarnus erythraeanus with examples shown in Table 8 and Figure 11. Antitumor natural peroxide products are known to induce cytotoxicity in cancer cells through the generation of particular reactive oxygen species (ROSs). Compounds 134–135 displayed mean IC50 growth inhibitions less than 10 μM with several tumor cell lines [41]. However, additional studies with 135 established no in vitro selective growth inhibition between normal and tumor cells. In assaying three cancer cells including murine leukemia (P-388), human lung carcinoma (A-549) and human colon carcinoma (HT-29), 140–143 exhibited an IC50 greater than 1 μg/mL [15] while 145 showed lower cytotoxicity against the same lines [42].
Table 8

Norsesterterpenes, sources and activities.

No.NameSourceActivity
132Nuapapuin A methyl ester [41]Diacarnus erythraeanus
133Methyl-2-epinuapapuanoate [41]D. erythraeanus
134(−)-13,14-Epoxymuqubilin A [41]D. erythraeanusanti-tumor
135(−)-9,10-Epoxymuqubilin A [41]D. erythraeanusanti-tumor
136(−)-Muqubilin A [41,43]D. erythraeanusanti-tumor
137Hurghaperoxide [41]D. erythraeanus
138Sigmosceptrellin B [41]D. erythraeanus
139Sigmosceptrellin B methyl ester [41]D. erythraeanus
140Aikupikoxide A [15]D. erythraeanuscytotoxic
141Aikupikoxide D [15]D. erythraeanuscytotoxic
142Aikupikoxide C [15]D. erythraeanuscytotoxic
143Aikupikoxide B [15]D. erythraeanuscytotoxic
144Tasnemoxide A [42]D. erythraeanuscytotoxic (anti-tumor)
145Tasnemoxide B [42]D. erythraeanuscytotoxic (anti-tumor)
146Tasnemoxide C [42]D. erythraeanuscytotoxic (anti-tumor)
147epi-Sigmosceptrellin B [44]D. erythraeanus
148Muqubilone [45]D. erythraeanusantimalarial
Figure 11

Structures of norterpenes (132–148).

Norsesterterpenes, sources and activities. Structures of norterpenes (132–148).

5. Triterpenes

Structurally diverse triterpenes are widespread in Red Sea sponges with examples shown in Table 9 and Figure 12. Compound 149 inhibits growth of human breast cancer cells, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, BT-474 and T-47D, in a dose-dependent manner [46,47]. Triterpenes have also been studied for their efficacy in reducing the appearance of drug resistance. In the presence of many cytotoxic drugs, resistant cell variants appear, a process referred to as multidrug resistance (MDR). Overexpression of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter ABCB1/P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is one of the most common causes of MDR in cancer cells. P-gp a 170-kD transmembrane glycoprotein functions as a drug efflux pump that extrudes a wide spectrum of compounds including amphipathic and hydrophobic drugs. Sipholane triterpenoids can serve as P-gp inhibitors and are being developed to enhance the effect of chemotherapeutic drugs with MDR cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [33,36]. Compounds 162–163 enhanced cytotoxicity of several P-gp substrate-anticancer drugs, including colchicine, vinblastine and paclitaxel. These sipholane triterpenes significantly reversed the MDR-phenotype in P-gp-over expressing MDR cancer cells, KB-C2, in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, these sipholanes have no effect on the response to cytotoxic agents in cells lacking P-gp expression or expressing MRP1 (ABCC1) or MRP7 (ABCC10) or with the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). Perhaps most importantly, these sipholanes with a low IC50 of ca. 50 μM are not toxic to the assayed cell lines [48].
Table 9

Triterpenes, sources and activities.

No.NameSourceActivity
149Neviotine-A [46,47]Siphonochalina siphonella
150Sipholenol A [47,49,50,51,52,53]S. siphonellaanti-tumor
151SipholenolA-4-O-3′,4′-dichlorobenzoate [49]S. siphonella
152Shaagrockol B [54]Toxiclona toxius
153Shaagrockol C [54]T. toxius
154Sipholenol G [55]S. siphonella
155Sipholenone D [55]S. siphonella
156Sipholenol F [55]S. siphonella
157Sipholenol H [55]S. siphonella
158Neviotine B [55]S. siphonella
159Sipholenoside A [55]S. siphonella
160Sipholenoside B [55]S. siphonella
161Siphonellinol B [55]S. siphonella
162Dahabinone A [55]S. siphonella
163Sipholenone E [51]S. siphonellaanti-tumor
164Sipholenol L [47,51]S. siphonellaanti-tumor
165Sipholenol J [51]S. siphonella
166(2S,4aS,5S,6R,8aS)-5-(2-((1S,3aS,5R,8aS,Z)-1-hydroxy-1,4,4,6-tetramethyl-1,2,3,3a,4,5,8,8a-octahydroazulen-5-yl)-ethyl)-4a,6-dimethyloctahydro-2H-chromene-2,6-diol [51]S. siphonella
167Sipholenol K [51]S. siphonella
168Sipholenol M [51]S. siphonella
169Siphonellinol D [51]S. siphonella
170Siphonellinol E [51]S. siphonella
171Siphonellinol-C-23-hydroperoxide [51]S. siphonella
172Siphonellinol C [56]S. siphonella
173epi-Sipholenol I [56]S. siphonella
174Sipholenol I [51]S. siphonella
175Sipholenone A [56,47]S. siphonella
176Sipholenol D [52]S. siphonella
177Neviotine-C [47]Siphonochalina siphonellacytotoxic
Figure 12

Structures of triterpenes (149–177).

Triterpenes, sources and activities. Structures of triterpenes (149–177).

6. Steroids

Steriods are widespread throughout the marine biome with recent chemical reports including soft coral (Sinularia candidula, S. polydactyla, Heteroxenia ghardaqensis, Dendronephthya sp., Lobophytom depressum and Litophyton arboreum) [9,11,24,57,58,59,60], black coral (Antipathes dichotoma) [38,40], and sponges (Echinoclathria gibbosa, Hyrtios sp., Erylus sp., and Petrosia sp.) [18,64,65,66]. Steroid examples are shown in Table 10 and Figure 13.
Table 10

Steroids, sources and activities.

No.NameSourceActivity
1783β-25-Dihydroxy-4-methyl-5α,8α-epidioxy-2-ketoergost-9-ene [57]Sinularia candidulaanti-viral
179Gorgosten-5(E)-3β-ol [58]Heteroxenia ghardaqensisanti-tumor
180Gorgostan-3β,5α,6β,11α-tetraol (sarcoaldosterol A) [58]H. ghardaqensis
181Gorgostan-3β,5α,6β-triol-11α-acetate [58]H. ghardaqensis
1825α-Pregna-3β-acetoxy-12β,16β-diol-20-one [59]Echinoclathria gibbosaanti-tumor
183β-Sitosterol-3-O-(3Z)-pentacosenoate [59]E. gibbosaanti-tumor
184Cholesterol [9]Dendronephthya
185Dendronesterone A [9]Dendronephthya
18624-Methylcholestane-3β,5α,6β,25-tetrol-25-monoacetate [24]Sinularia polydactylaanti-tumor
18724-Methylcholestane-5-en-3β,25-diol [24]S. polydactylaantimicrobial
188Lobophytosterol [60]L. depressum
1895β,6β-Epoxy-24E-methylchloestan-3β,22(R),25-triol [60]L. depressum
190Depresosterol [60]L. depressum
191(22R,24E,28E)-5β,6β-Epoxy-22,28-oxido-24-methyl-5α-cholestan-3β,25,28-triol [60]L. depressum
192(22R,24E)-24-Methylcholest-5-en-3β,22,25,28-tetraol [60]L. depressum
19324-Methylcholesta-5,24(28)-diene-3β-ol [11] Litophyton arboreum
1947β-Acetoxy-24-methylcholesta-5-24(28)-diene-3,19-diol [11]L. arboreumcytotoxic
19524-Methylcholesta-5,24(28)-diene-3β,7β,19-triol [11]L. arboreum
196Hyrtiosterol [16]Hyrtios Species
197Eryloside A [61,62,63]Genus Eryluscytotoxic
198(22E)-Methylcholesta-5,22-diene-1α,3β,7α-triol [64]Antipathes dichotomaanti-bacterial
1993β,7α-Dihydroxy-cholest-5-ene [64]A. dichotomaanti-bacterial
200(22E,24S)-5α,8α-Epidioxy-24 methylcholesta -6,22-dien-3β-ol [64]A. dichotomaanti-bacterial
201(22E,24S)-5α,8α-Epidioxy-24-methylcholesta-6,9(11),22-trien-3β-ol [64]A. dichotomaanti-bacterial
2023β-Hexadecanoylcholest-5-en-7-one [65]A. dichotomaanti-tumor
2033β-Hexadecanoylcholest-5-en-7β-ol [65]A. dichotomaanti-tumor
204Cholest-5-en-3β-yl-formate [65]A. dichotomaanti-tumor
2053β-Hydroxycholest-5-en-7-one [65]A. dichotoma
206Cholest-5-en-3β,7β-diol [65]A. dichotoma
20722-Dehydrocholestrol [65]A. dichotoma
2083β,7β,9α-Trihydroxycholest-5-en [66]Petrosiacytotoxic (anti-tumor)
209Cholest-5-en-7β-methyl-3β-yl formate [66]Petrosia sp.cytotoxic (anti-tumor)
210Dehydroepiandrosterone [66]Petrosia sp.cytotoxic (anti-tumor)
2117-Dehydrocholesterol [66]Petrosia sp.cytotoxic (anti-tumor)
2125α,6α-Epoxycholest-8(14)-ene-3β,7α-diol [66]Petrosia sp.cytotoxic (anti-tumor)
2135α,8α-Epidioxycholesta-6-en-3β-ol [66]Petrosia sp.cytotoxic (anti-tumor)
214Cholesta-8-en-3β,5α,6α,25-tetrol [67]Lamellodysidea herbacea
215Cholesta-8(14)-en-3β,5α,6α,25-tetrol [67]L. herbacea
216Cholesta-8,24-dien-3β,5α,6α-triol [67]L. herbaceaanti-fungal
217Cholesta-8(14),24-dien-3β,5α,6α-triol [67]L. herbaceaanti-fungal
218Clathsterol [68]Clathria sp.
219Clionasterol [69]Dragmacidon coccinea
220Stigmasterol [69]D. coccinea
221Campesterol [69]D. coccinea
222Brassicasterol [69]D. coccinea
223Dendrotriol [70]Dendronephthya hemprichi
224Erylosides K [62]Erylus lendenfeldi
225Erylosides L [62]E. lendenfeldi
226Erylosides B [63]E. lendenfeldi
Figure 13

Steriod structures (178–226).

Steroids, sources and activities. Steriod structures (178–226). Moderate growth inhibition for a human colon tumor cell line was observed with 180 [58]. Compounds 184 and 186 exhibited activity against three human tumor cell lines including the lung non-small cell line A549, the glioblastoma line U373 and the prostate line PC-3 [59]. Compound 187 showed an IC50 of 6.1 and 8.2 μg/mL against the human cancer cell lines HepG2 and HCT, respectively [24]. Compounds 204–207 show antibacterial activity against Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis) and Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa), at a 1 μg/ml concentration [64]. Compounds 208–210 exhibited antitumor activity based on four cancer panels: HepG2, WI 38, VERO, and MCF-7 [65]. Compounds 215–220 exhibited cytotoxic effects in the tumor cell lines, HepG2 and MCF-7 with IC50 in the range of 20-500 μM. Interestingly, 217 showed the highest affinity to DNA with IC50 30 μg/mL [66]. Compounds 223 and 224 showed antifungal activity against Candida tropicalis, with petri dish inhibition at 10 μg/disc [67].

7. Drug Leads

Even though terpenes are the largest group of natural products with over 25,000 structures thus far reported, a small subset of these metabolites have been investigated for biological function and/or activity. Basic biological constituents such as membrane components, hormones, antioxidants and chemical defenses require the isoprenoid building module. Future chemical studies of marine organisms are expected to generate an ensemble of novel terpenes based on progressive knowledge on enzymatic machinery and selective pressures under which such organisms have evolved. The expanding chemo-diversity of marine terpenes is being assisted in part by advanced analytical chemistry methods for structure determination and sophisticated diving techniques for sample collection. Methods for assaying for in vitro biological activity can be more variable in terms of stardardized protocols. The same positive or native chemical controls are not always utilized making direct comparisons of biological activity between different testing laboratories unreliable or at least not reproducible. Moreover, with the paucity of ethnomedical knowledge from marine sources, the basis for selecting the most promising bioassay can be more of an art than a science. The screening for anti-cancer activity in facilities such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Chemotherapeutic Agents Repository operated by Fisher BioServices [71] can provide invaluable, cost-free, sensitive screening of hits against multiple-target 60 cancer cell line panels, broadening the opportunity to conduct more comprehensive and mechanistic studies. In the case where a set of metabolites has already been identified possessing a given biological activity, computational, in silico, and pharmacophore modeling can guide future design of druggable analogues with better biological activity, without expected toxicity, even if the structural characterization of the biological target(s) is/are not feasible. Such virtual models utilizes steric and electronic descriptors to identify pharmacophoric features such as hydrophobic centroids, aromatic rings, hydrogen bonding acceptors/donors and cation/anion interactions to match optimal supramolecular interactions with a specific biological target that triggers or blocks a response. Functional group properties can also be identified for the rational semi-synthetic design of biologically active marine natural scaffolds. Strategies such as the Topliss scheme designate a series of substituents based on lipophilic, electronic and steric properties to generate multiple analogues with slight controlled chemical property differences that can be used for comprehensive structure-activity studies to obtain superior biological activity relative to the parent natural product. While these techniques and tools are not distinct or exclusive for exploring marine sources and marine-derived natural products, such methods can be effective for enhancing biological activity. For example, sipholenol A is a noteworthy example of developing a marine metabolite using medicinal chemistry approaches to generate biologically active analogue libraries [49]. These natural product examples with exceptional biological potency outcomes (IC50 in the low μM range for invasive breast cancer) demonstrate the potential of marine natural products for the discovery of future novel druggable entities useful for the control and management of human diseases.

8. Conclusions

Terpenoids provide a vast array of molecular architectures with the coral community of the Red Sea having added significantly to the structure database over the last thirty years. While marine invertebrates in this ecosystem are still being discovered, interest in both the chemistry and biological activity of Red Sea terpenes has generated many novel structures with promising biological activities.
  38 in total

1.  Antimycobacterial scalarane-based sesterterpenes from the Red Sea sponge Hyrtios erecta.

Authors:  Diaa T A Youssef; Lamiaa A Shaala; Samy Emara
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.050

2.  Salmahyrtisol A, a novel cytotoxic sesterterpene from the Red Sea sponge Hyrtios erecta.

Authors:  Diaa T A Youssef; Rodney K Yamaki; Michelle Kelly; Paul J Scheuer
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.050

3.  Bilosespens A and B: two novel cytotoxic sesterpenes from the marine sponge Dysidea cinerea.

Authors:  A Rudi; T Yosief; M Schleyer; Y Kashman
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  1999-08-12       Impact factor: 6.005

Review 4.  Molecular phylogenetic insights into the evolution of Octocorallia: a review.

Authors:  Catherine S McFadden; Juan A Sánchez; Scott C France
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  The magnitude of global marine species diversity.

Authors:  Ward Appeltans; Shane T Ahyong; Gary Anderson; Martin V Angel; Tom Artois; Nicolas Bailly; Roger Bamber; Anthony Barber; Ilse Bartsch; Annalisa Berta; Magdalena Błażewicz-Paszkowycz; Phil Bock; Geoff Boxshall; Christopher B Boyko; Simone Nunes Brandão; Rod A Bray; Niel L Bruce; Stephen D Cairns; Tin-Yam Chan; Lanna Cheng; Allen G Collins; Thomas Cribb; Marco Curini-Galletti; Farid Dahdouh-Guebas; Peter J F Davie; Michael N Dawson; Olivier De Clerck; Wim Decock; Sammy De Grave; Nicole J de Voogd; Daryl P Domning; Christian C Emig; Christer Erséus; William Eschmeyer; Kristian Fauchald; Daphne G Fautin; Stephen W Feist; Charles H J M Fransen; Hidetaka Furuya; Oscar Garcia-Alvarez; Sarah Gerken; David Gibson; Arjan Gittenberger; Serge Gofas; Liza Gómez-Daglio; Dennis P Gordon; Michael D Guiry; Francisco Hernandez; Bert W Hoeksema; Russell R Hopcroft; Damià Jaume; Paul Kirk; Nico Koedam; Stefan Koenemann; Jürgen B Kolb; Reinhardt M Kristensen; Andreas Kroh; Gretchen Lambert; David B Lazarus; Rafael Lemaitre; Matt Longshaw; Jim Lowry; Enrique Macpherson; Laurence P Madin; Christopher Mah; Gill Mapstone; Patsy A McLaughlin; Jan Mees; Kenneth Meland; Charles G Messing; Claudia E Mills; Tina N Molodtsova; Rich Mooi; Birger Neuhaus; Peter K L Ng; Claus Nielsen; Jon Norenburg; Dennis M Opresko; Masayuki Osawa; Gustav Paulay; William Perrin; John F Pilger; Gary C B Poore; Phil Pugh; Geoffrey B Read; James D Reimer; Marc Rius; Rosana M Rocha; José I Saiz-Salinas; Victor Scarabino; Bernd Schierwater; Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa; Kareen E Schnabel; Marilyn Schotte; Peter Schuchert; Enrico Schwabe; Hendrik Segers; Caryn Self-Sullivan; Noa Shenkar; Volker Siegel; Wolfgang Sterrer; Sabine Stöhr; Billie Swalla; Mark L Tasker; Erik V Thuesen; Tarmo Timm; M Antonio Todaro; Xavier Turon; Seth Tyler; Peter Uetz; Jacob van der Land; Bart Vanhoorne; Leen P van Ofwegen; Rob W M van Soest; Jan Vanaverbeke; Genefor Walker-Smith; T Chad Walter; Alan Warren; Gary C Williams; Simon P Wilson; Mark J Costello
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Marine sponge-derived sipholane triterpenoids reverse P-glycoprotein (ABCB1)-mediated multidrug resistance in cancer cells.

Authors:  Ioana Abraham; Sandeep Jain; Chung-Pu Wu; Mohammad A Khanfar; Yehong Kuang; Chun-Ling Dai; Zhi Shi; Xiang Chen; Liwu Fu; Suresh V Ambudkar; Khalid El Sayed; Zhe-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance by sipholane triterpenoids.

Authors:  Sandeep Jain; Surat Laphookhieo; Zhi Shi; Li-Wu Fu; Shin-Ichi Akiyama; Zhe-Sheng Chen; Diaa T A Youssef; Rob W M van Soest; Khalid A El Sayed
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 4.050

8.  A new gorgostane derivative from the Egyptian Red Sea soft coral Heteroxenia ghardaqensis.

Authors:  Abdelsamed I Elshamy; Ayman F Abdel-Razik; Mahmoud I Nassar; Tahia K Mohamed; Mohamed A Ibrahim; Salah M El-Kousy
Journal:  Nat Prod Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.861

9.  Tasnemoxides A-C, new cytotoxic cyclic norsesterterpene peroxides from the Red Sea sponge Diacarnus erythraenus.

Authors:  Diaa T A Youssef
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.050

10.  Bioactive hydroperoxyl cembranoids from the Red Sea soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum.

Authors:  Mohamed-Elamir F Hegazy; Amira M Gamal Eldeen; Abdelaaty A Shahat; Fathy F Abdel-Latif; Tarik A Mohamed; Bruce R Whittlesey; Paul W Paré
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.085

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Chemical and biological profile of Cespitularia species: A mini review.

Authors:  Abdelsamed I Elshamy; Mahmoud I Nassar; Tarik A Mohamed; Mohamed-Elamir F Hegazy
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 10.479

Review 2.  The Oxepane Motif in Marine Drugs.

Authors:  Héctor Barbero; Carlos Díez-Poza; Asunción Barbero
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.118

3.  Metabolomics reveals biotic and abiotic elicitor effects on the soft coral Sarcophyton ehrenbergi terpenoid content.

Authors:  Mohamed A Farag; Dalia A Al-Mahdy; Achim Meyer; Hildegard Westphal; Ludger A Wessjohann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Cembrene Diterpenoids with Ether Linkages from Sarcophyton ehrenbergi: An Anti-Proliferation and Molecular-Docking Assessment.

Authors:  Mohamed-Elamir F Hegazy; Abdelsamed I Elshamy; Tarik A Mohamed; Ahmed R Hamed; Mahmoud A A Ibrahim; Shinji Ohta; Paul W Paré
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.118

5.  In Silico Mining of Terpenes from Red-Sea Invertebrates for SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro) Inhibitors.

Authors:  Mahmoud A A Ibrahim; Alaa H M Abdelrahman; Tarik A Mohamed; Mohamed A M Atia; Montaser A M Al-Hammady; Khlood A A Abdeljawaad; Eman M Elkady; Mahmoud F Moustafa; Faris Alrumaihi; Khaled S Allemailem; Hesham R El-Seedi; Paul W Paré; Thomas Efferth; Mohamed-Elamir F Hegazy
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Cytotoxic Effects of Sarcophyton sp. Soft Corals-Is There a Correlation to Their NMR Fingerprints?

Authors:  Mohamed A Farag; Mostafa I Fekry; Montasser A Al-Hammady; Mohamed N Khalil; Hesham R El-Seedi; Achim Meyer; Andrea Porzel; Hildegard Westphal; Ludger A Wessjohann
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 7.  Marine Terpenoids from Polar Latitudes and Their Potential Applications in Biotechnology.

Authors:  Laura Núñez-Pons; Andrew Shilling; Cinzia Verde; Bill J Baker; Daniela Giordano
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 8.  Terpenoids from Marine Soft Coral of the Genus Lemnalia: Chemistry and Biological Activities.

Authors:  Qihao Wu; Jiadong Sun; Jianwei Chen; Huawei Zhang; Yue-Wei Guo; Hong Wang
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 9.  Terpenoids in Marine Heterobranch Molluscs.

Authors:  Conxita Avila
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 10.  The Phylum Bryozoa: From Biology to Biomedical Potential.

Authors:  Maria Letizia Ciavatta; Florence Lefranc; Leandro M Vieira; Robert Kiss; Marianna Carbone; Willem A L van Otterlo; Nicole B Lopanik; Andrea Waeschenbach
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.