| Literature DB >> 34373696 |
Thalita Miranda Vieira1, Ryhan Menezes Cardoso1, Nayane Chagas Carvalho Alves1, Silvio Emanuel Acioly Conrado de Menezes1, Shirley Machado Batista1, Silmara de Andrade Silva1, Christianne Velozo1, Diana Santana de Albuquerque1, Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro1.
Abstract
The main aim is to evaluate the cyclic fatigue resistance of blue heat-treated instruments with different kinematics. Twenty-four endodontic instruments of the same brand were used for each of three experimental groups: VB (Vortex Blue 40/0.04), RB (RECIPROC Blue 40/0.06), and XB (X1 Blue 40/0.06). The instruments were randomly distributed and subjected to temperatures of 20°C and 37°C. The fatigue test was performed using a stainless steel device. Data were analysed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, Student's t-test, the F test, and Tukey's and Tamhane tests at significance level P=0.05. The instruments' cyclic fatigue resistance at both temperatures differed significantly for each instrument type (P < 0.001). The RB instruments displayed greater cyclic fatigue resistance at the tested temperatures compared with the VB and XB instruments (P < 0.001). Reciprocating kinematics positively influenced cyclic fatigue resistance. Blue heat-treated instruments showed decreased cyclic fatigue resistance as the temperature increased (P < 0.001).Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34373696 PMCID: PMC8349260 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5584766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biomater ISSN: 1687-8787
Figure 1Custom device used for dynamic fatigue test.
Mean and standard deviation of the number of cycles to fracture (NCF) according to instrument type and temperature used.
| Instrument type | 20°C mean ± SD (CV%) | 37°C mean ± SD (CV%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| VB | 1.899 ± 629.73(A) | 1.033 ± 190.07(A) |
|
| XB | 2.974 ± 449.12(B) | 1.082 ± 374.19(A) |
|
| RB | 5.419 ± 1,179.85(C) | 2.019 ± 388.49(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
Significant difference at 0.05. (1)Student's t-test with equal variances. (2)Student's t-test with unequal variances. (3)F (analysis of variance (ANOVA)) test with Tukey's comparisons. (4)F (ANOVA) test with Tamhane comparisons. Different superscript letters in the same column mean significant difference (P < 0.01).
Figure 2Mean and standard deviation of the number of cycles to fracture (NCF) according to the instrument type and temperature used.