Literature DB >> 28527845

Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue Nickel-titanium Instruments.

Mustafa Gündoğar1, Taha Özyürek2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistances of Reciproc Blue (VDW, Munich, Germany), HyFlex EDM (Coltene/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland), WaveOne Gold (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), and OneShape (Micro Mega, Besancon, France) single-file NiTi systems.
METHODS: Thirty Reciproc Blue R25 (25/.08), 30 HyFlex EDM (25/.∼), 30 WaveOne Gold Primary (25/.07), and 30 OneShape (25/.06) instruments were included in this study. All the instruments were rotated in artificial canals, which were made of stainless steel with an inner diameter of 1.5 mm, a 60° angle of curvature, and radii of curvatures of 5 mm until fracture occurred, and the time to fracture was recorded in seconds using a digital chronometer. The data were analyzed statistically using Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Dunn tests via SPSS 21.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The statistical significance level was set at 5%.
RESULTS: The HyFlex EDM file (3456.33 ± 633.37) file had the statistically highest fatigue resistance, and the OneShape file (1221.63 ± 812.4) had the least fatigue resistance (P < .05). The mean number of cycles to fracture of the Reciproc Blue file (2875.89 ± 105.35) file was statistically higher than the WaveOne Gold file (1737.00 ± 376.32) (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference (P > .05) in the mean length of the fractured fragments of the files (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the present in vitro study, it was found that cyclic fatigue resistance of HyFlex EDM files was higher than the cyclic fatigue resistances of OneShape, Reciproc Blue, and WaveOne Gold files.
Copyright © 2017 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial canals; cyclic fatigue resistance; endodontics; nickel-titanium; single-file systems

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28527845     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  24 in total

1.  Cyclic fatigue and torsional strength of three different thermally treated reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments.

Authors:  Murilo Priori Alcalde; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Clovis Monteiro Bramante; Bruno Carvalho de Vasconselos; Mario Tanomaru-Filho; Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru; Jader Camilo Pinto; Marcus Vinicius Reis Só; Rodrigo Ricci Vivan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Cyclic fatigue resistances of Hyflex EDM, WaveOne gold, Reciproc blue and 2shape NiTi rotary files in different artificial canals.

Authors:  Taha Özyürek; Mustafa Gündoğar; Gülşah Uslu; Koray Yılmaz; Simone Staffoli; Grande Nm; Gianluca Plotino; Antonella Polimeni
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 3.  Endodontic Rotary Files, What Should an Endodontist Know?

Authors:  Ana-Belén Dablanca-Blanco; Pablo Castelo-Baz; Ramón Miguéns-Vila; Pablo Álvarez-Novoa; Benjamín Martín-Biedma
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 4.  Rotary science and its impact on instrument separation: A focused review.

Authors:  Sandhya Anand Khasnis; Prem Prakash Kar; Apoorva Kamal; Jayaprakash D Patil
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

5.  A Comparative Study of Cyclic Fatigue of 10 Different Types of Endodontic Instruments: an in Vitro Study.

Authors:  Jorge Rubio; José Ignacio Zarzosa; Antonio Pallarés
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2019-03

6.  Differences in cyclic fatigue lifespan between two different heat treated NiTi endodontic rotary instruments: WaveOne Gold vs EdgeOne Fire.

Authors:  Gianluca Gambarini; Massimo Galli; Dario Di Nardo; Marco Seracchiani; Orlando Donfrancesco; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 7.  Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems: What's New?

Authors:  Sadia Tabassum; Kamil Zafar; Fahad Umer
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2019-10-18

8.  Comparison of Obturation Removal Efficiency from Straight Root Canals with ProTaper Gold or Reciproc Blue: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Vicente Faus-Matoses; Cristina Pasarín-Linares; Ignacio Faus-Matoses; Federico Foschi; Salvatore Sauro; Vicente J Faus-Llácer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcomputed Tomography.

Authors:  Mohamed Mohamed Elashiry; Shehab Eldin Saber; Salma Hasan Elashry
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-01-31

10.  Influence of glide path size and operating kinetics on time to reach working length and fracture resistance of Twisted File adaptive and Endostar E3 nickel-titanium file systems.

Authors:  Tamilkumaran Ramyadharshini; Inbaraj Anand Sherwood; V Shanmugham Vigneshwar; Prakasam Ernest Prince; Murugadoss Vaanjay
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2020-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.